Search results

Now that I have established the terms correctly, I will answer specifically: Do you believe: That the Scriptures alone are our sole authority? No, it is the Spirit behind the scriptures who has sole authority, without which the scriptures are mere words and foolishness. That we are saved by...

Do not mistake the righteousness of the new man with the sins of the old man. If the old man makes a post confessing his sins, he has not put off the old man, nor put those things to death. But if the new man makes a post and claims his righteousness in Christ...he is not in error, but in...

You assume I am "afraid to address them." I am not. I have not addressed them because they are terms invented by the teachings of men. If they were of God, I would know of them. Therefore, I do not acknowledge them. That is the point of this discussion: What is of God and what is of men. You...

What is manifest in the world is both the good and the evil, unto judgement. The heavenly church is not of the world, although some are alive and remain in the world. Such are those who reign with Christ. But those evil among the church in the world are as tares among the wheat, wolves in...

No...I or anyone who can read could point you to where I answered you. But since you are being a brat, the answer is, No. Do it yourself.

No. I answered you. I told you to go back and look. You can do your own makeup.

You lying spirit...go back a look--I answered you.

Look...You are skating on thin ice. I named off your offenses, and the proof of them is recorded here in writing. There is no reason why I should believe anything except that you will again wrongly assume. Do what you will. Nonetheless, I have answered you already.

A liar, an accuser, and now unbelief coupled with name-calling. Not good character. I already answered truthfully.

Good passages. But does that mean you see what the actual subject of Jesus' exchange with Peter was in Matthew 16:17-18...that it was how Peter received the knowledge that Jesus was the Christ, which he received from the Father, and that it was not about Peter himself; and therefore the "rock"...

I couldn't even tell you what they are. Now, let's see what your character response is.

Okay... Who's Bobby Jo?

Now you are just lying. I said, "nor did I take any leads from others."

I do hope that you see or will come to see, in the exchange with Jesus and Peter (below), that the actual "subject" that Jesus was conveying was NOT Peter, but rather HOW Peter received the knowledge that Jesus was the Christ. The proper recognition of "subject" verses "object" changes...

I wasn't here 500 years ago, nor did I take any leads from others. But you are correct to say that you go back further; but wrong that Jesus started a worldly church of men of flesh. Because what He started was from His Father in heaven.

And there you go again confirming that you yourself (and your church) have not "entered in" to the kingdom of God...which began 2000 years ago. Talk about "moronic!" But thanks again for the confession.

While showing yourself.

The teachings of men, a fixation on your own teachings, lies, criticisms...oh, yeah, and rambling nonsense. Aren't you just the greatest!

If you were a green apple now ripe, it is not the end, but the beginning. That puts you closer to Him, not further. Keep the faith. Praying!

This is one of those situations like the coming of Christ 2000 years ago, which if one were to say that those seemingly small events of that day was the apex of all human history, they would be scoffed at. So, scoff away. But what was describe was not "cosmic", it was spiritual...and if you...