Search results

So they do learn war again, contrary to what you first claimed and the text demands.

I showed you above how that is not true. Once again, you ignored that. Sadly, this seems to be your pattern.

I already showed you the biblical evidence and you already sidestepped the evidence. I will repost. Please address the text instead of always presenting your own opinions. This is a common Premil trait. Jesus said Revelation 3:21: “I … overcame.” Revelation 5:5 tells us: “behold, the Lion of...

Oh, so they do learn war again. Hmmmm. That contradicts your text and previous statements.

So, this army rises up in their billions (as the sand of the sea) and surround the camp of the saints in order to destroy them and you do not think that constitutes learning war? That does make sense.

Your answers always seem framed to allow Premil even though the text contradicts your claims.

How would you estimate "the sand of the sea" then?

Exactly! Amen!

Not so! This text is basically telling us that the awful state of the wicked is eternally unchanged. They are damned and doomed eternally. They are forever accursed. After talking about the righteous and their eternal bliss the prophet then turns to the awful fate of the wicked. Isaiah 65:20...

So, they do learn war again? Your doctrine is so contradictory at every turn. It simply doesn't add up.

You are seeing double on every key prediction in Scripture. Premils wrongly see 2 bindings of Satan, 2 last days periods, 2 NHNEs, 2 resurrection days, 2 judgment days, etc, etc. If you would just correlate these up with each you would see these all occur once. All because of your faulty...

The key question is: is your billions of mortal rebels that inherit and overrun your alleged future millennium going to "learn war anymore" (as you allege) or are they not? The Premil millennium has been portrayed for years as some Edenic arrangement with unparalleled bliss and wholesale...

If you would actually take the time to look at the text and detail you would better understand it. There is zero contradiction. I've already showed this on this thread, but you obviously missed it or simply just rejected it. Let us have a literal word-by-word look at the Hebrew pertaining to...

When did you address the passages I presented? Please give me the post.

I presented you with various clear, undeniable and watertight passages that prove the last days where ushered in by Christ, are ongoing and will end at the coming of Christ and you rejected that. You failed to address one single passage. It is hard engaging with someone who refuses to accept the...

The plan of God is never thwarted by man. His clock is never delayed. God's plan has been unfolding since the beginning. Christ came on time and accomplished everything asked of Him. He is coming soon to usher in the end. Then we are into eternity.

You reinforce #16 of the Op. It is the sacred text here that refutes your opinion, not Amils. Your fight is with the various Scriptures texts you sidestepped and failed to acknowledge and address. You should know: personal opinion means nothing. You render your future millennium everything...

Again, as is your pattern, you provide no historic evidence for your opinion, just ongoing personal opinion. This is totally inadmissible. I have presented hard facts over the years to show the source of modern-day Premil. You have presented nothing of historic merit to refute it. You normally...

The millennium is not the beginning of the last days. The earthly ministry of Christ is. The last days are now and the last day is the climactic second coming. The Old Testament prophecies of “the last days” relate to the period following the Messiah’s first appearance when He introduced the...

This is getting even more confusing. You are presenting nothing from Rev 20 or anywhere else in the NT and not addressing the issue here. You are also taking NHNE passages pertaining to the NHNE (Isa 65) and the last days (Isa 2) and applying them to your so-called future millennium and Rev 20...