Search results

Revelation is written in an apocalyptic manner. It is not the symbol that is important. It is what the symbol means. Apocalyptic language is similar to parabolic language. It represents spiritual truths and literal ongoing spiritual events. Let us establish an important fact, Revelation 20 does...

You are not getting it are you? In the figurative depiction it is the dragon that is thrown in prison and put in chains. It is metaphoric symbolism. The spiritual meaning of the symbolism is that it depicts the spiritual restrain that is upon Satan as the Gospel invades the nations since...

It may shock Premillennialists to know that the views they hold and promote today were sourced and spread in antiquity chiefly among heretics. When we look for the originators and formulators of modern-day Premillennialism we actually arrive at four shadowy early figures. The first two operated...

It is saturated with sin and sinners, crying and dying, decay and disease.

Exactly bro! He has nothing else to put is hat on in the whole of Scripture.

Of course you are not going to address any post, argument or Scripture directly as you would immediately have to admit that the Op is spot on. That is why you must run from this discussion. Your ongoing avoidance and admissions have reinforced the Op. For that I am most thankful. You have yet to...

Matthew 12:22-29 records, “Then was brought unto him one possessed with a devil, blind, and dumb: and he healed him, insomuch that the blind and dumb both spake and saw. And all the people were amazed, and said, Is not this the son of David? But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, This...

You are brazen to talk like this. Your insults reveal the impotence of your position. Before the RCC the early Fathers held to this truth. I have showed you that Revelation 19 is climactic. I have showed you the futility of your highlighting of the word kai. But alas you refuse to address my...

Please do not speak on behalf of Amils. You do not have a clue what we believe. Posts like this prove it. Every time you do you twist what Amils believe. That is why I normally ignore your posts. Read up on Amil before engaging on these forums, then you might understand what we believe. I am not...

It is shocking (but understandable) how much Scripture you dodge in order try and sustain your position. I will try again as it is obvious these queries expose your position. Isaiah 11:10 says, “And in that day there shall be a root of Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people; to...

Your posts are very hard to read. They are full of typos. They're all over the place. You do not look to precedence. You have no support elsewhere in Scripture for a future 1000 years. Your posts are full of opinion and devoid of Scripture. When others present hard Scripture you dismiss or...

It is a symbolic passage in the most figurative setting in Scripture. What is more: you have zero corrobration to support a literal interpretation of this metaphoric portrayal. Is the key mentioned in Rev 20:1 a metal door key? No. Is the chain mentioned in Rev 20:1 a iron chain? No. Is...

It is interesting that each of these parallels that were received in heaven (2-7) start with the Greek word kai ("And") even though they commence a new vision pertaining to the intra-Advent period and ending at the second coming.

Hello! The Greek word kai is normally interpreted "and" in Scripture not "then."

Hello! The Greek word kai is normally interpreted "and" in Scripture not "then." It is Premils that must change the meaning to support their error. They have clearly no answer to Amil. They have no corroboration. This is such a one-sided discussion. There has still been no viable response to the...

You presented one argument that I quickly refuted and which you (notably) ignored. I showed you the fallacy of your chronological theory and you had no answer, apart from personal attacks. Address the issues and stop avoiding!

The reader can see for himself who is addressing the issue, who has corroboration and who is presenting a biblical argument. I previously showed you, and once again you avoided it: "It is interesting that each of these parallels that were received in heaven (2-7) start with the Greek word kai...

I get it that you interpret the rest of Scripture by your faulty opinion of Revelation 20 but Amils interpret Revelation 20 by employing the rest of Scripture to explain it. I get it that you dismiss any Scripture that exposes your faulty opinion of Revelation 20. Amils are the opposite.

Not so! Was there any significant change in the Gospel focus that occurred as a result of the life, death and resurrection of Christ? Was there any benefit? Was there any increase in the scope of the light shining? Was there a major turnaround in the state of the Gentiles between the Old and...

Once again you avoid every single text that rebuts Premil. You are obsessed with 1 chapter - Rev 20. That is all you and Premils want to talk about. That is all you have. This is what I highlighted in the Op, and you are proving it. Your cry is "what saith Rev 20." That is the Premil mantra...