Search results

Exactly! That is what occurs at the one final future return of Christ. It is so significant that Pretribs cannot present one single proof-text that teaches a rapture of the Church followed by a 7-year tribulation period followed by a 3rd coming of Christ?

The burden of proof is with Pretribulationists to actually prove that their doctrine is in the Bible. None of them can show one Scripture that supports their paradigm. It is simply not there.

Pretribs teach 2 parousias. Scripture teaches one. Your avoidance confirms what we all know: Pretrib has no proof text.

This is talking about His First Advent.

Instead of stating opinions: where in Scripture teaches a rapture of the Church followed by a 7-year tribulation period followed by a 3rd coming of Christ? I cannot see it. That is why I abandoned Pretrib.

Are you threatening?

I agree! It is very clear: Peter makes clear that there is absolutely no uncertainty over the realization of the Lord’s “promise” to return. He affirms: “The Lord is not slack concerning his promise.” Essentially God will assuredly keep His Word. Peter also reminds us that time is nothing with...

Exactly. It is simple, accurate and contextual.

Please stop avoiding. What do you think is Peter's point?

What is your point? This is the end of the world, the end of time, and the end of the bondage of corruption.

Revelation 11:8 explicitly states, “the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.” This description was definitely not intended to be a commendation of Jerusalem but to describe it for exactly what it was/is. Many modern pro-Israel commentators...

Once again, you ignore the text and just voice your opinion. Those that would argue that a man’s natural race carries any merit or difference before God when it comes to salvation or that it in any way adds anything to a man’s spiritual status are severely censured by passages like Galatians 6...

Not so. The cultivated olive tree consists of “natural branches” – which represent Israel (God’s Old Testament covenant people). But because of unbelief many of them were cut out of their own tree. The very fact that they are called “natural branches” shows us that they characterize the original...

You totally sidestepped what I was talking about and changed subject. This is typical with Dispensationalism. You then cobble Scripture to support your error. There is no Scripture that teaches your doctrine. I suspect you know that by your avoidance. Dispensationalists typically present the...

It is very hard to read your posts. You might need to check the spelling and grammar before posting. 1. The Bible says we have been grafted into 'an Israeli tree' (Romans 9-11). Is that an ethnic or spiritual tree? 2. The Bible says we who were once aliens from the "citizenship of Israel"...

Hey, do what you want. It is nothing to me. I am not interested in your infantile threats. Where do you get that the OT saints are not the Church? Where do you get that the Trib saints are not the Church? It is certainly not in the Bible. Understandably, you provide no supporting Scripture...

Isaiah 53:3-7 says, “He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not. Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and...

Yes. All the redeemed are rescued just before all the wicked are destroyed. That all occurs on the same last day. He's noticed that the destruction is sudden destruction. None shall escape. There is no delay.

What does all that matter if he is wrong in his theology?

Jesus said in John 5:23b-24, “He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.”...