Search results

No, you do not agree with it. You are actually fighting it. Rom. 11 is not a vine it is an olive tree. Please read it again. You are getting mixed up.

The reality is: God rejects the ethnic apartheid you promote. There is nothing more unbiblical in this new covenant period than trying to divide up the people of God on the grounds of ethnicity. That is spiritual apartheid. It runs completely to the New Testament plan of God to bring Jew and...

Not true. You're fighting with Scripture. No one objective could surely dispute we are looking at an Israeli tree here. Paul carefully describes the Jews who have been cut off as “natural branches” and being of “their own olive tree.” This shows us that this is an Israeli tree that held...

Where does it say that exactly in Scripture?

I agree! The reason they cannot answer simple questions is because it is simply not there in Scripture.

1 Thessalonians 4 does not prove Pretrib. All it proves is that there is a catching away of the saints when Jesus comes. We both agree that there is a catching away in 1 Thessalonians 4. That is not the issue. But you force a 7-years trib into it and a 3rd coming that does not exist in the text...

Galatians 6:15-16 states, “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature. And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on [Gr. epi] them, and mercy, even on [Gr. kai epi] the Israel of God.” You attempt to create two peoples of God...

Paul makes 3 overriding points in Romans 9–11: · He establishes the great and lofty truth of divine election. · He determines who true Israel is. · He then shows how the Gentiles have been integrated into faithful Israel. But the central (and overriding) theme that permeates...

There is natural Israel and spiritual Israel in Scripture. One of the most prevalent symbols employed in the New Testament to describe the union between God’s people and Christ is the olive tree. Of course, this would have been a real natural tree that most Israelites were familiar with. It was...

1 Thessalonians 4 does not prove Pretrib. All it proves is that there is a catching away of the saints when Jesus comes. We both agree that there is a catching away in 1 Thessalonians 4. That is not the issue. But you force a 7-years trib into it and a 3rd coming that does not exist in the text...

Galatians 6:15-16 says, “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature. And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.” Q. 1 Who is he specifically speaking to? Q. 2 What is Paul speaking...

If you cannot explain the grounds of your position here there is zero chance I am going to some unknown online link you recommend. Doing this tells me you have no argument.

Read your New Testament and you will find out. It is not rocket science. The Church is true believing Israel. They are the real circumcision. They got what was predicted here and are now wonderfully redeemed. Romans 2:25 tells us: “if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made...

I honestly do not know what you're trying to say here.

Explain your point then.

When it was given they were divided. When Jesus came they were back as one. The new covenant has been wrought. men choose whether they embrace it or not.

It is being fulfilled since the first Advent.

1 Corinthians 11:24-26: “And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament [diathēkē or covenant] in my...

I gave you the passages. You ignored them. I refer you back.

Exactly.