Search results

My pleasure.

You have it backwards. Jesus clarified that speaking against the son of man was forgivable, but not so against the Holy Spirit, which is the test of brotherhood during these times.

The proof is written here over 17 pages, which proof also makes you the liar, rather than me, as well as an accuser.

After a downward spiral of events of many years time, at the end of myself, I spoke out to him, and he answered; and I was caught up above the earth, not in body, but in the spirit, and shown many things in visions, in an experience more real than this life and this world. Then returning me to...

You asked for details, making accusations that they were not provided. Atoms are details. Atoms do not "lead me to conclude that God exists." God lead me rather, to know he exists. Which leading was finished from the first moment.

I have been quoting Jesus and the Spirit all along and you do not recognize it. Even when I do use chapter, verse, and quotation marks, you speak against me, saying the words are mine and not from the scriptures. For which there is no need to prove it, for "you say so" (Luke 23:3) already.

Then you are skeptical also of Jesus. Matthew 23:19 Fools and blind! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that sanctifies the gift?

Jesus went there, and I follow.

God has given you the details in details of atoms, and we have filled in the blanks. You have no argument and no excuse. But what is your question that I have not answered? Perhaps it is you who should be more specific. As for a mature conversation, that is not what you have purposed.

You are not qualified to say. The truth is not in you.

You fool, shall I also quote Jesus' response, saying that his actions declared who he was? If I do the same, and you have a problem with it - tell it to him.

As I said...you greatly misunderstand. You have not reconciled your assumption that what the apostles say was Jesus ascending in the flesh, with the fact that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of heaven...and men have therefore constructed a doctrine contrary to what is actually...

That is not how Jesus, or Paul, or any of the apostles or prophets quoted scripture. Got a complaint? Tell them.

Again, you dodge or unknowingly avoid the point...which is "the fact that having no evidence of your own, you yourself have decided to make a case against God, against a universe of evidence." So, you can go on and on about what doesn't really matter, or you can face the real issue. The real...

The rocks cry out. I am driven. When the wave of His spirit rises, I have succumb to surfing rather than being crushed and washed up on the beach. He is my Rock.

Tell it to Webster. The semantics don't change the fact that having no evidence of your own, you yourself have decided to make a case against God, against a universe of evidence.

You greatly misunderstand. Christ did not commit his body to the Father, but his spirit only. Now we are his body, but not because of our flesh, but because of his spirit. Thus, when Christ comes to all, he comes in spirit...and this he said in parable that the ungodly would be confounded and...

Only One is true. You misunderstand. That is foolishness. Nonetheless, yes, you can believe anything you want...and also receive all that comes with it. a·the·ist /ˈāTHēəst/ noun: A person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods. By definition...you are apparently even...

If you knew the word of God, you would know that I have been quoting it all along. But you also misunderstand: What I have said, I do not "believe", but know.

Are you saying Muslims, Hindus, and Mormons, etc., "know there is a god?" Because I would never say that - nor did I. Because most Christians do not "know" there is a God, but "believe" there is. But at the core of such beliefs, is another group who actually "know." But don't misunderstand, that...