Search results

For some reason, you are taking this as a mystical truth rather than a metaphysical, literal truth. Jesus also prayed to the Father that we would be One. That does make it literally true or that we are God.

Where did you learn that from?

That's encouraging but what you write after shows it is not true. You still do not capisce! Just jettison your 'source' commentary? Oy vey! The healing of the ankle happened before or after the source of your knowledge was obtained about twisting ankles? NOTE: "Healing" is a process that...

I was thinking the same way. No responsible parent would only tell their child once not to run into the street and then blame the child if they disobey from that one admonition.

Your "not" was twisted and wrong as I demonstrated by various direct and explicit Scripture verses. Which of these statements are true? A. Jesus died. B. Jesus did not die. The 'not' is not right, then or now.

Feel free to educate yourself on the meaning of a strawman argument by referencing your favorite dictionary or website on such matters. It is not merely a false statement but a weaker argument. (It has nothing to do with casting the arguer in a negative light. That is Ad Homenim.) Many argue...

Right, making it not Biblical. You can claim it is based on the Bible, making it Biblical. I say it is anti-Biblical, even going against other creeds.

Agreed! The Holy Bible testifies Jesus is NOT God. It only says God the Father - in every Epistle, over and over again. For us, there is one God, the Father. Jesus says the Father is his God, the only true God. In addition, the Holy Bible repeatedly tells us Jesus was a man and like all men...

That is the Strawman. Except the Angels that didn’t meet the standards is your Strawman that they did.

Yes.

Not at all. ‘The Lord’s Day’ is the new creation through Christ which parallels the original Creation of God.

Strawman. ‘Special honor’ a Sabbath does not make.

It is not an assertion. The organization as now constituted did not begin until the 12th century. The connection to Peter as the 1st Pope is specious. And there is no Apostolic writing that supports the RCC Hierarchy as currently constituted.

LOL

You no capisce. It's true that the source of shoes is the shoe story but the topic of conversation is how saints twisted their ankle. Why do you keep talking about the source? You no capisce! I'll post it again so your obtuse inner processes can ponder that @Phoneman777 made it pretty clear the...

No. It is supposition on your part as a desperate attempt to create a Strawman, for reasons that are not entirely clear. Except for all the times I was wrong, I have always been right also. The desperateness of your position grows with each passing sentence you write. Wrong. You cannot just...

All? I simply asked what verse says what you claim. Simple. Obviously, you cannot provide the verse because it does not exist. As a poor substitute, you engage in artifical sythnesis; a piece of a verse out of context, here; a piece of a verse out of context, there. It is so cumbersome and...

Jesus did not ask Peter once if he loved him. He did not say to forgive once. God created, then recreated via Noah then created a 3rd time through Jesus. Scripture is filled with multiple attempts on God’s part. I think you are confusing the responsibility, not to merely throw to the wind, but...

What verse says that?

If that were true, 1/3 of the Angels would not have rebelled against God.