Search results

Reading your doctrine into verses where it is absent. You have to do this because the Scriptural support for it is so weak. Do you notice the word NOT? What Jesus did NOT do? Here is another legitimate take on this verse. Jesus was humble and did not repeat the Original Sin of being a man...

It begs the question of why do trinitarians openly embrace anti-Christ theology, directly contradicting what he explicitly said? Why do they aim to make the simple and obvious into complicated and circumspect? Every single Epistle explicitly tells us "God the Father." Every single one! There is...

Wow! Taking logic on its head. "In the form of" is the clue it is NOT what it is in the form of. For instance, my savings jar is in the form of a pig. That is how you know it is not a pig. If it were a pig, one would clearly not use the words "In the form of." Instead, one would simply say that...

So, your argument is, exceptions make rules?! your statement "eskimos live above the equator" is another false one! I met an Eskimo in Australia. Good grief man!

One of the most common mistakes people make is to equate beauty with goodness. A very evil person can be beautiful. Lucifer is said to be very beautiful. It is vanity to think beauty is morally good.

Jesus shows me the true God of the Bible, which is his father. See John 17:3.

I try to avoid your many dogmatic posts.

Lords are not god. Jesus is a lord and my lord and he says his father is the only true God. For some reason, that is not good enough for you. Having said that, your nasty post really has nothing to do with this thread.

He answered the question - brilliantly. For some reason, it seems you have contempt for one having fun while doing the lord's work.

This reminds me of the saying that a person forced to change her mind is of the same opinion still. She cannot defend her doctrine, answer the questions, explain the points she disagrees with or even write in complete sentences. We all know 'toxic waste' is meant as an insult. This is not of...

Did Jesus every reply to what someone said with 'that's stupid?' You are confused. For some reason, you are falsely equating God's word with the Bible, the contents with the container. Fact is, we are supposed to worship God, not a book. Doing so IS idolatry. If this is not idolatry, then...

Brilliant analysis. I look forward to Keith's response.

Not sure why you quote Scripture or reference me going elsewhere. I was only referring to the presenters presentation style, not the content of this theology.

So, it's tacitly admitted by Taken that the below statement is an uncontested fact.

Seems like you are judging. What is it about Mormonism that turns people off? I don't get it. He prays to open. Nicely done. Regarding your comment, 'the speaker seems to be having an intellectual discussion with himself without seemingly going anywhere with that discussion;' I agree. Although...

In law and debates, there is such a thing as tacit admission. If you do not deny a claim, it becomes accepted as uncontested fact. Your replies are not responsive to the claim. The question is, is @robert derrick's statement above in green correct? (Choose A or B.) A. If yes, please confirm. B...

No. You've created an idol called The Bible. Some even idolize a particular translation. While the container is noted, what is holy is not the parchment container but the Word of God. It is fool hardy to attempt to divide God from his Will and Words, it is incorrect discernment to suppose this...

No one is trying to separate God from his word. There was another thread differentiating faith in God from faith in a book. Big difference. To some, no difference.

I wonder why these is not a world wide depository of testimonies like mine? When I encounter an atheist, who says there is no evidence for god, such a depository would be invaluable. I believe it would also be invaluable to those luke warm in their faith to reflect with more intensity who they...

Doesn't it seem OSAS is the doctrine of perfectionism OR ex post facto, you never accepted Christ (never <insert mystical words here>)?