Search results

What would be the motivation for Christian Russia to invade Israel?

Another threat. Another admission you've lost the argument, unable to refute the Scriptural reference John 17:3.

Sadly, you are in the darkness. John 1:1-13 refers to God, not Jesus. Verse 14 is the 1st reference to Jesus.

Accept the ant-Scriptural trinity doctrine or be called antichrist? JW's are Christian. That you call Christians antichrists is shows how desperate you are to remain on offense, confusing opposition to trinitarianism with opposition to Christ.

When I read this, I thought the thread was the attack thread on JW. That you even felt it necessary to write this in a thread entitled Understanding the Trinity shows the trinitarian tendency to avoid introspection altogether, ignore questions and constantly go on offense ... if you don't...

That's sad. The DJ on the Christian radio station I listen to says "The world is filled with nice people. If you cannot find one, be one." I look forward to your future posts proving how you love in Jesus name. All glory to God!

Yea, better to remain ignorant. (And it is only 42 minutes long). :p

No. Scripture does not declare that Jesus was equal to God! You are confused by the twisted NOT, which says he did not think it robbery. By contrast to your trinitarian misinterpretation, Jesus explicitly said God is greater than he is. Obviously, trinitarians take their idol over the explicit...

That reminds me of the movie The Matrix, shortly after Neo became aware of the real world. After Morpheous explained to Neo that he is 'the one' prophesied, one of Morpheous' cohorts asked him how he is processing the burden of that information. It was all so overwhelming to Neo and I imagine...

Certainty is not applicable where belief is concerned just as the historical record of the present is not applicable.

Absolutely not! In the Beginning was God who spoke words. Speaking is an attribute of God's being - not another person of his being. Ironically, I re-read John 1 at 4 AM today. The 1st 13 verses are talking about God, not Jesus. Perhaps this video will enlighten you on how badly trinitarians...

Again, your reflection in a mirror is not you. God's likeness shown in the flesh is not God. Reading in trinitarian doctrine unto unitarian text does NOT supercede the explicit verses - such as John 17:3 and 20:17 - where Jesus talks about his God and how his God is the only true God. To that...

A species of life, like dog whose name is Lassie. But when there is only one dog, the title is synonymous with the name, right? When one says that THE (definite article) came over, one is naming the visitor. So, what is your point?

In John’s Gospel @ 1:31 and again @ v 33, the Baptizer says ‘I myself did not know him,’ referring to his cousin, Jesus. This is not literally likely, especially since Mary visited for months before he was born. And that begs the question of why did he say it twice? It is a different thing to...

Great post! God did lay out perfectly who he - singular - is; it’s just that the entire book is written by monotheist Jews (except possibly Luke) who reject the trinity to this day, which explicitly goes against the trinity 1,000’s of times.

And this relates to the thread topic how?

Do you realize saying one is called 'God with us' does not literally mean that person is God incarnate? And if it did, every person so named must also be God, right? If not, why not?

I am paying attention, just disregarding your 3is1ism rationalizations. There is not one verse in all of Scripture that states Jesus raised himself from the dead. Referencing a verse where Jesus talks about rebuilding a temple is precisely the kind of rationalization to supersede explicit...

So, you don’t believe Acts 17:31. Gotcha! When Scripture reads God (in his unitarian nature) raised Jesus from the dead, you impose your trinitarian doctrine onto the plain unitarian text. Bless your heart!

Do you believe the words in Acts 17:31 that says God, in his unitarian nature, raised Jesus from the dead?