Search results

:wub: Ok I have a question for you KJV Only types.... do you believe in unicorns? Satyrs? cause they are in the KJV :rolleyes:

Why do you wait after death? Hebrews 9:27 (KJV) 27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:

Was this not mostly covered in the recently closed debate on KJV Only? For you KJV which version are you using? there were over 28 revisions to the KJV. Even today are you using the Cambridge or Oxford?

God Bless you Abeliever! May the NKJV be a blessing to you! Forgive me if I have been to harsh. The KJV was fine in its time. Today modern translations are very well done and put together. I do hope you enjoy the NKJV, which of course Soujerner would blast as "corrupt" translation. I ask...

Again Wescott and Hort did not write the modern translations. Where do you get this drivel? Name one modern day translation that uses Wescott and Hort? I have asked that and get .... nothing. One I know of referenced them, but did not use them. Do you even realize what they did? They combined...

As I just stated and you avoided to answer: The KJV translators were no more or less inspired than those who help translate modern day translations. Or are you going to cast aspersions on modern day translators? Besides you have never denied Erasmus as being a translator... you do realize that...

The KJV translators were no more or less inspired than those who help translate modern day translations. Or are you going to cast aspersions on modern day translators? Besides you have never denied Erasmus as being a translator... you do realize that he aand a couple of others were Roman...

Again you are in denial. I have made point and point only to go against your stubborness. Try this site: http://www.bible.ca/b-kjv-only.htm#?1#?1#WebrootPlugIn#?1#?1#PhreshPhish#?1#?1#agtpwd May God have mercy on you for attacking his scripture.

Boy do you have a selective reading and memory. This quote alone from av1611.org Brief History of the King James Version: "The Authorized Version, as it came to be called, went through several editions and revisions. Two notable editions were that of 1629, the first ever printed at Cambridge...

I have given many sources, you schrug them off cause they cast light on your darkness! You went off on Wikipedia, yet you avoided and evaded the av1611.org site? Why is that? You can not name one modern bible that solely uses "Wescott-Hort" in your attempt to cast doubt on their validity. Some...

Point is I got you in another un-truth and you won't admit it. Point is you spew out falsehoods and innuedo designed to mislead and deliberately disparage modern translations that are the equal of the KJV. The KJV WAS revised over the 400 year history. to say not is hypocritical.

Again you misdirect deliberately. Why? So what about Wikipedia. I also used another source .... remember? Now for your statement: "The King James Bible is under a Letters Patent; it is the only Bible not bound by a copyright. No author or publisher receives a royalty because God is the author...

Seems you have a hard head or just do not want to know the "truth." From wikipedia dealing with the KJV the 1769 Text: "Parris and Blayney sought consistently to remove those elements of the 1611 and subsequent editions that they believed were due to the vagaries of printers, while...

Which KJV Bible was God’s perfectly preserved translation in English? The one in 1611 or one of the revisions in 1613, 1629, 1638, 1644, 1664, 1701, 1744, 1762, 1769, or the last one in 1850? Please specify which one. What was God’s perfectly preserved translation in English before 1611? Please...

OK...... again: Some Protestants do use the Apocrypha. You seem to avoid that. Also there are the Orthodox which not only inlude the Apocrypha but include 2 more books. But as you say the KJV is "pure" why was it removed? Also if it was NOT "pure" in the 1611 why was it removed? You are...

A complete cop out! I should have known. Odd you use the Bible as a weapon and not what it was intended for. Why is that? I say this in the KJV for you: (Rom 12:3) For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to...

Still non-answers and all inuendo. Some Protestants do use the Apocrypha. You seem to avoid that. Also there are the Orthodox which not only inlude the Apocrypha but include 2 more books. But as you say the KJV is "pure" why was it removed? Also if it was NOT "pure" in the 1611 why was it...

I stated that earlier. You seem to remember only what you want to. Which KJV are you using? The 1611 has been modified quite a few times. In fact no one uses the 1611 at all today. Do you use the Oxford or Cambridge? Why did revisions to the KJV add verses, delete whole books? Do you believe in...

Why do you avoid what I have said about the KJV? Please answer that.

Ok Sojourner, That reply is bull. For one your quotes did not show proof. Just a statement from a KJV Only site. Another is how they were chopped to portray out of context what you wanted them to say. Still NO bible uses the Westcott-Hort as the basis for their translations. They reference it...