Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Your claim Is "False"
- The beast has been around for over 2000 years (Revelation 17:8, Revelation 17:11-13, 1 John 2:18-23, 1 John 4:1-3, 5-6, 2 John 1:7, and 2 Thessalonians 2:3-13). No man has lived that long on earth. Only a wicked spirit, an evil empire or a nefarious system could possibly fulfil that portrayal.
The scripture states "In Them" refers to "Those That Persih", as you have been clearly shown, as you bend and twist God's words to suit your reformed preterist needs
- How can a literal human being be literally “in them that perish” (2 Thessalonians 2:10)? This would suggest him being in every single unsaved person. Only a spirit can do that.
Your claim is "False" God's words State all non-believers that dwell upon the earth will worship himThe beast carries the allegiance of all the non-elect. No single human being has or ever or will possess that wholesale allegiance. What possibly human is going to get the allegiance of all false religious, all carnal political parties, every single tribe, ethnic group, culture and nation? Only a broader worldly spirit enjoys all the loyalty of the wicked.
You have been shown several times that "Sea" represents multitudes of people, not oceans of waterFinally, what human being in history lives in, and rises up out of, the sea at the end? Such an idea is nonsensical.
Your problem is, claiming a literal kingdom on this earth is seen in Revelation 20:1-6 it isn't, it's a fabricated fairy tale of manAvoid literal verses or avoid redefining them as metaphors?
1: Rev 20
2: Rev 20(I noticed you already knew answer 1)
3: Rev 19-20
4: Zech 14, Isaiah 1 Cor 15 etc.
5: Rev 20.
I thought you read these chapters?
Those are the easiest questions ever asked.
You have been shown several times that "Sea" represents multitudes of people, not oceans of water
The Beast will rise out of multitudes of people
The whore sits upon many waters, multitudes of people
Your claim is "False" God's words State all non-believers that dwell upon the earth will worship him
Revelation 13:8KJV
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
The scripture states "In Them" refers to "Those That Persih", as you have been clearly shown, as you bend and twist God's words to suit your reformed preterist needs
For the forum to read, WPM posts things he doesn't believe, a waste of time!Finally, what human being in history lives in, and rises up out of, the sea at the end? Such an idea is nonsensical.
Your claim is false, as you bend and twist the scripture, you have been answered on all your questions previouslyMore avoidance. Deal with the issue. How can this literal human be in all those who perish? This doesn't make sense.
More avoidance and lies. You lost the argument a long time ago with your avoidance. Your name-calling was an admission you had zero rebuttals.For the forum to read, WPM posts things he doesn't believe, a waste of time!
Quote WPM Post # 6788
I agree. It is a symbolic sea that a symbolic beast rises out of. The whore is also symbolic.
Your claim is false, as you bend and twist the scripture, you have been answered on all your questions previously
Who is your literal beast? Where is he from? Where does he function?Your claim is false, as you bend and twist the scripture, you have been answered on all your questions previously
Lol...Your problem is, claiming a literal kingdom on this earth is seen in Revelation 20:1-6 it isn't, it's a fabricated fairy tale of man
No Kingdom On Earth, No Throne On Earth, No Mortal Humans On Earth Are Seen
The Amil...."Please find me where else it says 1000 years ,6 times in 6 verses because I need more proof".Your support for your opinion of Revelation 20 is your opinion of Revelation 20. That is ridiculous. That is horrible hermeneutics. You are just proving my point. You obviously know you have nothing. That is why you cannot quote God's Word. None of these references (outside of Revelation 20) even mention a millennium. You have to add unto Scripture to create one. If you think you have support you would be more than happy to quote the sacred text.
The Amil...."Please find me where else it says 1000 years ,6 times in 6 verses because I need more proof".
LOL
6 times in a row in 6 verses.It is called interpreting Scripture with Scripture, something you cannot (or will not) seem to do. We have already established the symbolic thrust of Revelation. Names, entities and numbers are used in a figurative sense to impress deep spiritual truths. Unfortunately, Premils constantly spiritualize the literal and literalize the spiritual to support their error.
6 times in a row in 6 verses.
Not enough?
Verily, verily, verily, verily, verily, verily I say to you, is not enough?
Do Amils have to be spoon fed?