- Sep 8, 2013
- 52
- 2
- 0
[SIZE=medium]'Edward' is a mythical 'christian' who claims and objects to certain things in the Bible, on the grounds that God couldn't have said or done some of these things. Strangely enough, he accepts other things - like 'love thy neighbour', and thinks that Jesus couldn't be cruel and unkind. He therefore rejects those parts of scripture which say such things. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]This is written to shake him up a little, and any others on this forum who may have such inclinations.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]**************************************************************************************************[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]I am more than a little concerned about the attitude displayed by Edward who really ought to know better, (and Moule who Edward quotes so approvingly), and by the consequential arguments that Edward raises: all of which seem to me to be undermining anybody’s faith in the inspiration of Holy Scripture.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Moule claims to have read the Bible daily for 50 years. Paul did too, and look at how many he killed and jailed! But certainly Paul would have no truck with the kind of view you are expressing. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]If he argued so fiercely against people wishing to reinstate circumcision, what do you think he would have said about people seeking to denigrate and diminish the Word of his God.? Why, the very pages of his denunciation would catch fire.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do? Make no mistake, the attitude Moule displays, and Edward approves, is destructive to anybody’s view of the authority of the Bible, a whittling away at the foundations mentioned above. And if that authority is diminished or destroyed, then what does that leave but a mouthful of sawdust?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]The safest way to determine how we, or anybody else, should look at the scriptures, is to assess the authority that Jesus attributes to them, to view His attitude to them with the attention a follower would give to his Leader. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]If after such viewing, we still feel that we are in a position to say well, this bit is inspired, and that bit is not, then we should set up our own sect or something similar where such views are tolerated and encouraged.The Anglicans and many other mainstream churches offer such havens to the ‘inspiration’ disaffected.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Here is the most meaningless statement I have ever read Edward making:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]“With love in the Lord, to whom in one way and another the testimony of all scripture leads; his lordship is the infallible message to which we are led.”[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]‘Infallible’message? How do you know that Edward? Were not the gospels and epistles and the Revelation all expressions of the views of the day? Doctored and watered down or up according to the point of view of the writer and not of God Himself?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Isn’t that what you are saying? Once you pull at a single strand in a woollen sweater, the whole thing comes undone in your very hands. YOU HAVE NO LOGICAL, OR EVEN COMMON-SENSICAL, STOPPING POINT.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]How do you know Jesus was the Son of God? How do you know that He died? How do you know that He rose again from the dead? How do you know that He is at the right hand of God in heaven and will come again to judge the living and the dead? How do you even know there is a God? How do you know anything, in fact?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Because the Bible says so, do you reply? [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]But those Biblical views may well be the views of mistaken men, all under the cultural influences of their day, expressing views which are not in any way necessarily correct. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]So which ones DO you view as being correct? And what justification can you offer for saying that they are correct? [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]You, Moule and others like you, seem to be severely deficient in logic. YOU SIMPLY CAN’T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS. And your readers (who all seem to be nodding sagely and saying ‘yes Edward, isn’t that wonderful Edward’ because I see no serious challenge to your opinions), are also headed downstream over the edge of the falls which lie ahead, and have claimed the lives of so many.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]But as I said, the safest way to proceed is to examine the attitude of this man you claim as ‘Lord’, to the Scriptures, His Father’s Word to mankind. Let’s do that in a brief survey. What do we find?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Nothing but respect. Nothing but: this is what the scriptures say, so that’s IT. No discussion. No dispute. No: oh that was the culture of the day. And many of His quotations and appeals are to passages you would have no hesitation in saying: that’s un-Christlike. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Which raises the next question: how un-Christlike was Christ?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Here:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]1. 4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]2. [/SIZE]Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.
[SIZE=medium]3 Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Observe: That’s what it says, and as far as I am concerned, THAT’S IT.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]That’s a quotation from the 10 Commandments: given by some desert god to a bunch of ignorant slaves and savages, at some mythical mount. Isn’t it? And how do you know it has any authority anyway?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium] Same again: [/SIZE]given by some desert god to a bunch of ignorant slaves and savages, at some mythical mount. Isn’t it? And how do you know it has any authority anyway?
[SIZE=medium]Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Same again: [/SIZE]given by some desert god to a bunch of ignorant slaves and savages, at some mythical mount. Isn’t it? And how do you know it has any authority anyway?
[SIZE=medium]An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Wow! : Un-Christlike commandment [/SIZE]given by some desert god to a bunch of ignorant slaves and savages, at some mythical mount. Isn’t it? And how do you know it has any authority anyway?
[SIZE=medium]Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy[/SIZE].
[SIZE=medium]He doesn’t say it was false! Just: here’s a better way which also comes from the same law: Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Mt 21. 13 And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves…[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]And its true![/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]16 And said unto him, Hearest thou what these say? And Jesus saith unto them, Yea; have ye never read, Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou hast perfected praise?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]And it’s true. And it is part of my authority for saying I am the Son of God.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Mt 22.31 But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying,[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]This is the verse of verses, which kills your meanderings stone dead.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Here is this desert god, talking to the mythical Moses, at a mythical bush, which was mythically burning.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]And Jesus builds the whole doctrine of the resurrection on the present tense of the verb ‘to be’. I ‘AM’ finishes it for me, He says. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Believest thou this Edward? If the present tense of the verb to be, in this way out passage, says you are going to be raised from the dead, ought you not to take your shoes off, doff your hat, and be respectful with your opinion of the inspiration of the scriptures – and spend your time finding out WHY it is the word of God instead of this carping, which is surely going to lead many to destruction, if they haven’t managed to get there by themselves already?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]38 This is the first and great commandment.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Both of these are in the Law of that desert god. Jesus says it is final. No further discussion is allowed, or necessary. But is that good enough for you? I doubt it.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying,[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Look! He says, here’s proof that I am the Son of God, greater than David or Solomon, come to that. Now are you going to argue the point, He asks? That Psalm was written by an ignorant shepherd boy in the bushes somewhere. How can that possibly be inspired? But He says it is, and that’s good enough for me. You going to argue with him?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]64 Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]That’s fact, He says, and you are going to suffer because of it. What an un-Christlike statement! Did Jesus say that, really? Or was it the insertion of some later scribe or something? But Jesus DIDN’T say that. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]It was Daniel. You know, that Jewish/Babylonian illiterate who couldn’t write or prophesy, as your higher critical friends might say. It was good enough for Jesus at this last stage of His life here. Good enough for you?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]46 And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]He recites the Psalm: inspired as it was by God. But the same Psalm prophesied about his garments being gambled for, and the dogs encompassing Him. Inspired or not?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]29 And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]So He believed that Solomon existed! And draws lessons from the man’s opulence. No argument about inspiration there.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]15 Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]What an un-Christlike statement! But look – he believed in the existence of S & G, and even more so, in the judgment. Do you? And if so, why?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]13 For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]14 And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Look, that’s authoritative, He says. Because Malachi said so. It’s true. Inspired too, because he foretold the future. Do you believe that?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]3 But he said unto them, Have ye not read what David did, when he was an hungred, and they that were with him;[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]4 How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the shewbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]5 Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Look, that’s an accurate historical record, and furnishes authority for my disciples doing this. Do you believe that, Edward?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]7 But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Look, says Jesus. That’s authoritative, inspired, true. But here’s the un-Christlike context of that: [/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]5 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] Therefore have I hewed them by the prophets; I have slain them by the words of my mouth: and thy judgments are as the light that goeth forth.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]6 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]7 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] But they like men have transgressed the covenant: there have they dealt treacherously against me.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]8 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] Gilead is a city of them that work iniquity, and is polluted with blood.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]9 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] And as troops of robbers wait for a man, so the company of priests murder in the way by consent: for they commit lewdness.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]10 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] I have seen an horrible thing in the house of Israel: there is the whoredom of Ephraim, Israel is defiled.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Believest thou that this is inspired Edward?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]18 Behold my servant, whom I have chosen; my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my spirit upon him, and he shall shew judgment to the Gentiles.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]19 He shall not strive, nor cry; neither shall any man hear his voice in the streets.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]20 A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall he not quench, till he send forth judgment unto victory.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]21 And in his name shall the Gentiles trust.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]We-l-l-l-l…. What did that joker Isaiah know about anything? Inspired? Hah. Which Isaiah anyway? No 24 or no.33? Inspired or hallucinating vaporously?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Well, we know what Jesus thought. What do you think?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]41 The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Oh look! That Jewish kid’s fable! What? Swallowed and regurgitated by a fish and survived? Eyewash! Or is it? Jesus held it to be true – your ‘Lord’, remember. Do you and Moule know better than He? I wonder.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]42 The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]So he took the history of Solomon very seriously, and the existence of the Q of Sheba. Do you? Inspired or not?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]4 For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]5 But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]6 And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]7 Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Is there any doubt that He regarded these as the words of God? Inspired and authoritative? I can’t see the slightest vestige of doubt in there, do you?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]4 For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]5 But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]6 And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]7 Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]He makes the very clear distinction between what man says, and what God says right there. So God said that lot, according to your ‘Lord.’ But what do you think? Inspired or not? [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]So Genesis isn’t folklore. God did it. God wrote it. It has His authority, says Jesus your ‘Lord’. I accept it as such, says Jesus your ‘Lord’. But do you? That’s the question.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Same as the above.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]So this relatively short selection from Matthew’s gospel alone is unanimous in declaring that the OT is[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]a. From God and therefore[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]b. Inspired and [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]c. Authoritative and d. Not to be questioned or trifled with.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Question: do you Edward, and you, readers, accept this, or not? If not, then you can forget all this nonsense about Jesus being your ‘Lord’. You know better than He does.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]This is written to shake him up a little, and any others on this forum who may have such inclinations.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]**************************************************************************************************[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]I am more than a little concerned about the attitude displayed by Edward who really ought to know better, (and Moule who Edward quotes so approvingly), and by the consequential arguments that Edward raises: all of which seem to me to be undermining anybody’s faith in the inspiration of Holy Scripture.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Moule claims to have read the Bible daily for 50 years. Paul did too, and look at how many he killed and jailed! But certainly Paul would have no truck with the kind of view you are expressing. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]If he argued so fiercely against people wishing to reinstate circumcision, what do you think he would have said about people seeking to denigrate and diminish the Word of his God.? Why, the very pages of his denunciation would catch fire.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do? Make no mistake, the attitude Moule displays, and Edward approves, is destructive to anybody’s view of the authority of the Bible, a whittling away at the foundations mentioned above. And if that authority is diminished or destroyed, then what does that leave but a mouthful of sawdust?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]The safest way to determine how we, or anybody else, should look at the scriptures, is to assess the authority that Jesus attributes to them, to view His attitude to them with the attention a follower would give to his Leader. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]If after such viewing, we still feel that we are in a position to say well, this bit is inspired, and that bit is not, then we should set up our own sect or something similar where such views are tolerated and encouraged.The Anglicans and many other mainstream churches offer such havens to the ‘inspiration’ disaffected.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Here is the most meaningless statement I have ever read Edward making:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]“With love in the Lord, to whom in one way and another the testimony of all scripture leads; his lordship is the infallible message to which we are led.”[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]‘Infallible’message? How do you know that Edward? Were not the gospels and epistles and the Revelation all expressions of the views of the day? Doctored and watered down or up according to the point of view of the writer and not of God Himself?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Isn’t that what you are saying? Once you pull at a single strand in a woollen sweater, the whole thing comes undone in your very hands. YOU HAVE NO LOGICAL, OR EVEN COMMON-SENSICAL, STOPPING POINT.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]How do you know Jesus was the Son of God? How do you know that He died? How do you know that He rose again from the dead? How do you know that He is at the right hand of God in heaven and will come again to judge the living and the dead? How do you even know there is a God? How do you know anything, in fact?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Because the Bible says so, do you reply? [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]But those Biblical views may well be the views of mistaken men, all under the cultural influences of their day, expressing views which are not in any way necessarily correct. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]So which ones DO you view as being correct? And what justification can you offer for saying that they are correct? [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]You, Moule and others like you, seem to be severely deficient in logic. YOU SIMPLY CAN’T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS. And your readers (who all seem to be nodding sagely and saying ‘yes Edward, isn’t that wonderful Edward’ because I see no serious challenge to your opinions), are also headed downstream over the edge of the falls which lie ahead, and have claimed the lives of so many.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]But as I said, the safest way to proceed is to examine the attitude of this man you claim as ‘Lord’, to the Scriptures, His Father’s Word to mankind. Let’s do that in a brief survey. What do we find?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Nothing but respect. Nothing but: this is what the scriptures say, so that’s IT. No discussion. No dispute. No: oh that was the culture of the day. And many of His quotations and appeals are to passages you would have no hesitation in saying: that’s un-Christlike. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Which raises the next question: how un-Christlike was Christ?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Here:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]1. 4 But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]2. [/SIZE]Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.
[SIZE=medium]3 Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Observe: That’s what it says, and as far as I am concerned, THAT’S IT.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]That’s a quotation from the 10 Commandments: given by some desert god to a bunch of ignorant slaves and savages, at some mythical mount. Isn’t it? And how do you know it has any authority anyway?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium] Same again: [/SIZE]given by some desert god to a bunch of ignorant slaves and savages, at some mythical mount. Isn’t it? And how do you know it has any authority anyway?
[SIZE=medium]Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Same again: [/SIZE]given by some desert god to a bunch of ignorant slaves and savages, at some mythical mount. Isn’t it? And how do you know it has any authority anyway?
[SIZE=medium]An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Wow! : Un-Christlike commandment [/SIZE]given by some desert god to a bunch of ignorant slaves and savages, at some mythical mount. Isn’t it? And how do you know it has any authority anyway?
[SIZE=medium]Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy[/SIZE].
[SIZE=medium]He doesn’t say it was false! Just: here’s a better way which also comes from the same law: Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Mt 21. 13 And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves…[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]And its true![/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]16 And said unto him, Hearest thou what these say? And Jesus saith unto them, Yea; have ye never read, Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou hast perfected praise?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]And it’s true. And it is part of my authority for saying I am the Son of God.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Mt 22.31 But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying,[/SIZE]
- [SIZE=medium]I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]This is the verse of verses, which kills your meanderings stone dead.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Here is this desert god, talking to the mythical Moses, at a mythical bush, which was mythically burning.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]And Jesus builds the whole doctrine of the resurrection on the present tense of the verb ‘to be’. I ‘AM’ finishes it for me, He says. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Believest thou this Edward? If the present tense of the verb to be, in this way out passage, says you are going to be raised from the dead, ought you not to take your shoes off, doff your hat, and be respectful with your opinion of the inspiration of the scriptures – and spend your time finding out WHY it is the word of God instead of this carping, which is surely going to lead many to destruction, if they haven’t managed to get there by themselves already?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]38 This is the first and great commandment.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Both of these are in the Law of that desert god. Jesus says it is final. No further discussion is allowed, or necessary. But is that good enough for you? I doubt it.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]43 He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying,[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]45 If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Look! He says, here’s proof that I am the Son of God, greater than David or Solomon, come to that. Now are you going to argue the point, He asks? That Psalm was written by an ignorant shepherd boy in the bushes somewhere. How can that possibly be inspired? But He says it is, and that’s good enough for me. You going to argue with him?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]35 That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]64 Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]That’s fact, He says, and you are going to suffer because of it. What an un-Christlike statement! Did Jesus say that, really? Or was it the insertion of some later scribe or something? But Jesus DIDN’T say that. [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]It was Daniel. You know, that Jewish/Babylonian illiterate who couldn’t write or prophesy, as your higher critical friends might say. It was good enough for Jesus at this last stage of His life here. Good enough for you?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]46 And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]He recites the Psalm: inspired as it was by God. But the same Psalm prophesied about his garments being gambled for, and the dogs encompassing Him. Inspired or not?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]29 And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]So He believed that Solomon existed! And draws lessons from the man’s opulence. No argument about inspiration there.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]15 Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]What an un-Christlike statement! But look – he believed in the existence of S & G, and even more so, in the judgment. Do you? And if so, why?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]13 For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]14 And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Look, that’s authoritative, He says. Because Malachi said so. It’s true. Inspired too, because he foretold the future. Do you believe that?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]3 But he said unto them, Have ye not read what David did, when he was an hungred, and they that were with him;[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]4 How he entered into the house of God, and did eat the shewbread, which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them which were with him, but only for the priests?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]5 Or have ye not read in the law, how that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the sabbath, and are blameless?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Look, that’s an accurate historical record, and furnishes authority for my disciples doing this. Do you believe that, Edward?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]7 But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Look, says Jesus. That’s authoritative, inspired, true. But here’s the un-Christlike context of that: [/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]5 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] Therefore have I hewed them by the prophets; I have slain them by the words of my mouth: and thy judgments are as the light that goeth forth.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]6 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]7 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] But they like men have transgressed the covenant: there have they dealt treacherously against me.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]8 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] Gilead is a city of them that work iniquity, and is polluted with blood.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]9 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] And as troops of robbers wait for a man, so the company of priests murder in the way by consent: for they commit lewdness.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=7pt]10 [/SIZE][SIZE=10pt] I have seen an horrible thing in the house of Israel: there is the whoredom of Ephraim, Israel is defiled.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Believest thou that this is inspired Edward?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]18 Behold my servant, whom I have chosen; my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my spirit upon him, and he shall shew judgment to the Gentiles.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]19 He shall not strive, nor cry; neither shall any man hear his voice in the streets.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]20 A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall he not quench, till he send forth judgment unto victory.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]21 And in his name shall the Gentiles trust.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]We-l-l-l-l…. What did that joker Isaiah know about anything? Inspired? Hah. Which Isaiah anyway? No 24 or no.33? Inspired or hallucinating vaporously?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Well, we know what Jesus thought. What do you think?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]41 The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Oh look! That Jewish kid’s fable! What? Swallowed and regurgitated by a fish and survived? Eyewash! Or is it? Jesus held it to be true – your ‘Lord’, remember. Do you and Moule know better than He? I wonder.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]42 The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]So he took the history of Solomon very seriously, and the existence of the Q of Sheba. Do you? Inspired or not?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]4 For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]5 But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]6 And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]7 Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Is there any doubt that He regarded these as the words of God? Inspired and authoritative? I can’t see the slightest vestige of doubt in there, do you?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]4 For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]5 But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]6 And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]7 Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]8 This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]9 But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]He makes the very clear distinction between what man says, and what God says right there. So God said that lot, according to your ‘Lord.’ But what do you think? Inspired or not? [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]So Genesis isn’t folklore. God did it. God wrote it. It has His authority, says Jesus your ‘Lord’. I accept it as such, says Jesus your ‘Lord’. But do you? That’s the question.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]7 They say unto him, Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]8 He saith unto them, Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives: but from the beginning it was not so.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Same as the above.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]So this relatively short selection from Matthew’s gospel alone is unanimous in declaring that the OT is[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]a. From God and therefore[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]b. Inspired and [/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]c. Authoritative and d. Not to be questioned or trifled with.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=medium]Question: do you Edward, and you, readers, accept this, or not? If not, then you can forget all this nonsense about Jesus being your ‘Lord’. You know better than He does.[/SIZE]