A serious questions for the Jehovah's Witnesses on these threads.

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

The Learner

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2022
3,728
996
113
67
Brighton
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
If the righteous dead go to Abraham's bosom, where did the folk go before Abraham died? Did Abraham go into his bosom?
They "slept with his fathers".


Isaiah 14:1-11
Easy-to-Read Version
Israel Will Return Home
14 The Lord will again show his love to Jacob. He will again choose the people of Israel. He will give them their land. Then the non-Israelites[a] will join the Israelites, and both will become one family—Jacob’s family. 2 Those nations will bring the Israelites back to their land. The men and women from the other nations will become slaves to Israel. In the past, those people forced the Israelites to become their slaves. But in the future the Israelites will defeat those nations, and Israel will then rule over them in the Lord’s land. 3 In the past, you were slaves. People forced you to work hard. But the Lord will take away the hard work you were forced to do.

A Song About the King of Babylon
4 At that time you will begin to sing this song about the king of Babylon:

The king was cruel when he ruled us,
but now his rule is finished.
5 The Lord breaks the scepter of evil rulers;
he takes away their power.
6 In anger, the king of Babylon beat the people.
He never stopped beating them.
He was an evil ruler who ruled in anger.
He never stopped hurting people.
7 But now, the whole country rests and is quiet.
Now the people begin to celebrate.
8 You were an evil king,
and now you are finished.
Even the pine trees are happy.
The cedar trees of Lebanon rejoice.
They say, “The king chopped us down,
but now the king has fallen,
and he will never stand again.”
9 The place of death is excited
that you are coming.
Sheol is waking the spirits
of all the leaders of the earth for you.
Sheol is making the kings stand up
from their thrones to meet you.
10 They will make fun of you, saying,
“Now you are as dead as we are.
Now you are just like us.”
11 Your pride has been sent down to Sheol.
The music from your harps announces the coming of your proud spirit.
Maggots will be the bed you lie on,
and other worms will cover your body like a blanket.
 

Ronald Nolette

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
12,655
3,756
113
69
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
The “rich man and Lazarus” is not a story about individuals, but about two completely different groups of people.
The “rich man” represented the Pharisees who had no concern at all for the ones that they considered “lost”......the “beggar” represented the “lost sheep” to whom Jesus was sent, sitting at the gate waiting for a few crumbs that might fall from the rich man’s table.....the “bosom of Abraham” is a position of favour with God since he was the only man in scripture called “Jehovah’s friend”. (James 2:23)

Their “deaths” meant a change in their individual status...it meant that they swapped places. The “lost sheep” who responded to Jesus and accepted him as Messiah, now gained the bosom position, and the the Pharisees officially lost it. By the time of Jesus’ ministry, it had been about 300 years since God had tried to correct his wayward nation by sending them his prophets....Jesus was the last chance that Israel had to come back to God.....but as a nation, they never did...the “beggars” however, began to be fed and they had Jesus and his apostles as their teachers. Only a “remnant” of natural Israel was going to respond, as the scriptures had foretold. (Romans 9:27)
Yes this is the official watchtower reinterpretation of this true account , but it is wrong as usual.
I’m sorry, but that just made me shake my head.....you refer to a parable and assume that the details are real rather than metaphorical. Parables are not real stories about real people, but illustrative of realities that Jesus’ audience did not always understand. Sometimes he explained them, but sometimes he didn’t. His teachings would explain more as time went on.
A free lesson in biblical hermeneutics for you.

Parables always deal with some aspect of the kingdom of heaven. They always used comparative language "like" "such as" "can be likened unto" "is compared to" etc.etc..

No parable ever mentioned people by name.
This account has no comparative language.
It used commonly understood truths of the people, like th place of torment, and Abrhama's bosom
It used a known place where beggars would sit to beg.

There is nothing biblical to suggest or even imply this is a parable.
Wow....do you think you have you begun to educate me? :jest: Since this is what I have always believed, I assume that you have fooled yourself here. It is the Bible that tells me that “spiritual death” is not the same as “physical death”. We will have a different view on what that means however.
Yes we will because you reject the fact that man has a spirit that is not just breath.
Sorry, the Bible disagrees with you. Paul, being one of the elect, had a heavenly hope (Hebrews 3:1)....that of being resurrected “in the spirit” as Jesus was. That meant shedding his fleshly body and being given a spiritual one. That is not the destiny of all Christians however. The elect are to be rulers and priests in God’s Kingdom, (Revelation 20:6) sharing rulership with their King Christ Jesus. But their subjects will live on earth. (Revelation 21:2-4) I hope to be one of them....
Ah Yes the myth of the 144,000. but no all who trust in the physical resurrection of Jesus when they physically die go to be with the Lord.

But you overlook the bigger thing. Paul said when HE as a person is absent from His body- He is present with the Lord! that means Paul like the Jews of His day (except the Sadducees) knew man is a body, soul and spirit. Yo uare just wrong in parroting the doctrine of the Watchtower that contradicts the bible.
 

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
5,189
2,312
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
this is the official watchtower reinterpretation of this true account , but it is wrong as usual.
How do you know that it is wrong? Who told you it was? You assume that it must be wrong because it disagrees with what you have been told that it means.....so who told you?
Think back and ask who it was who told Jesus and his disciples that what they were teaching was wrong?
Who told them?
Parables always deal with some aspect of the kingdom of heaven. They always used comparative language "like" "such as" "can be likened unto" "is compared to" etc.etc..
Exactly, and the rich man and Lazarus is no exception. Since Jesus was Jewish, this parable related to the Pharisees and the “lost sheep” to who Jesus was sent, it makes complete sense because the Jews had no concept of heaven or hell and Jesus would not have taught something that the Hebrew Scriptures never mentioned. The ancient Jews believed in resurrection, not immortality of the soul.

No parable ever mentioned people by name.
This account has no comparative language.
It used commonly understood truths of the people, like th place of torment, and Abrhama's bosom
It used a known place where beggars would sit to beg.
The Jews did not have a place of torment ever mentioned in their scripture. God never had a punishment where fire was used to torture anyone.
The “bosom” position in Jewish understanding was a position of favor. When dining, the bosom position was occupied by a favoured guest....these reclined on a couch, on their left side with a pillow supporting their left elbow, leaving the right arm free. Usually three people occupied each couch, but there could be as many as five. The head of each one would be on or near the breast, or bosom, of the person behind him. The person with no one at his back was considered in the highest position and the one next to him in the second place of honor. In view of the nearness of the guests to one another, it was the custom that friend be placed next to friend, which made it rather easy to engage in confidential conversation if desired.

This makes Christendom’s version of “Abraham’s bosom” into something ridiculous.
There is nothing biblical to suggest or even imply this is a parable.
Are you serious? Read it in situ.....it is surrounded by other parables.....as illustrations were Jesus’ favored mode of teaching. To accept your interpretation is to deny what the Jewish scriptures taught, and what Jewish belief about life after death involved.
When Jesus’ friend Lazarus died, where did he go? Where did Jesus say that he was? (John 11:11-14)
What did Lazarus’ sister confirm was Jewish belief about the death and resurrection?

John 11: 20-24...
“When Martha heard that Jesus was coming, she went to meet him; but Mary kept sitting at home. 21 Martha then said to Jesus: “Lord, if you had been here, my brother would not have died. 22 Yet even now I know that whatever you ask God for, God will give you.” 23 Jesus said to her: “Your brother will rise.” 24 Martha said to him: “I know he will rise in the resurrection on the last day.”

What is “the resurrection n the last day”? Martha knew, and so did Jesus, but this one time, Jesus was going to demonstrate what resurrection really means by bringing his friend back to life.....in the flesh, then and there.

you reject the fact that man has a spirit that is not just breath.
No I do not....I simply disagree with what you believe about what the original language words mean according to the understanding of the people at that time....not the skewed interpretation that came centuries later by the “weeds” of counterfeit “Christianity” that Jesus foretold would infiltrate the world.
Yes the myth of the 144,000. but no all who trust in the physical resurrection of Jesus when they physically die go to be with the Lord.
What???? The 144,000 are clearly mentioned in Revelation as being those “chosen from among mankind as firstfruits”....which for an agricultural people was very familiar terminology. “Firstfruits” were the pick of the crop...the very best and choicest......the secondary fruits came later. Still good but not as choice as the firstfruits. (Rev 14:1-5) Those of the elect are clearly said to be “resurrected first”. (Rev 20:6)

Why can’t they be a literal number, especially when contrasted with the other group that John saw as a ”great multitude that no man could number” who were also attributing salvation to God and the Lamb? (Rev 7:9-10; 13-14)
There are two resurrections that the Bible speaks of.....one to heaven for the elect, specially chosen as “kings and priests” to rule with Christ in his kingdom and there is the general resurrection of the dead once Christ brings the rulership of his kingdom to this earth. A restoration of God’s first purpose is then accomplished as redeemed mankind is brought back to the same physical, moral and spiritual perfection as Adam and his wife were created with in the beginning....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cassandra

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
5,189
2,312
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
But you overlook the bigger thing. Paul said when HE as a person is absent from His body- He is present with the Lord! that means Paul like the Jews of His day (except the Sadducees) knew man is a body, soul and spirit. Yo uare just wrong in parroting the doctrine of the Watchtower that contradicts the bible.
What you overlook IMO, is that nothing in your view is what the scriptures in their entirety, teach. It doesn’t make a lick of sense, nor does it explain why we are here, or what God gave the human race as their assignment here.

Everyone going to heaven or everyone staying on earth isn’t what is contained in ‘the big picture’.

The Earth was beautifully designed for living “souls” to enjoy....life here was meant to be everlasting, and it was supposed to be wonderful.....but because the gift of free will was abused, firstly by a spirit creature, who then separated the new humans from their Creator by tempting them with a ‘carrot’....self interest. This ‘carrot’ seemed to be very attractive to the woman.....but she wasn’t his real target...the man was. He created a situation where Adam was forced to divide his loyalties....to choose between his wife and his God. He chose badly and created the reason for Christ to come and rescue their children.

Everything that came after that was completely messed up by those who misinterpreted what God was doing....misled by the one who caused the problem in the first place. How successful has he been?
You only have to read the posts here to see how much division there is....the devil’s agenda is accomplished by willing victims, especially those who have no idea that he is controlling the whole situation.

Why does God allow him to do this? What would you answer?
 

Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2021
13,299
4,960
113
55
Shining City on a Hill
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Why can’t they be a literal number, especially when contrasted with the other group that John saw as a ”great multitude that no man could number” who were also attributing salvation to God and the Lamb? (Rev 7:9-10; 13-14)
I applied your patience, as well as your thoroughness.

If this thread was a serious question (about what we are not allowed to discuss anymore), I would have abandoned it long ago. The obtuse have an advantage the wise do not.
Proverbs 26 (CEV):​
4 Don't make a fool of yourself by answering a fool.
5 But if you answer any fools, show how foolish they are, so they won't feel smart.
Proverbs 29​
9 If a wise man has an argument with a fool, the fool only rages and laughs, and there is no quiet.​
I confess v4 & v5 take some discernment.
 

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
5,189
2,312
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
I applied your patience, as well as your thoroughness.

If this thread was a serious question (about what we are not allowed to discuss anymore), I would have abandoned it long ago. The obtuse have an advantage the wise do not.
Proverbs 26 (CEV):​
4 Don't make a fool of yourself by answering a fool.
5 But if you answer any fools, show how foolish they are, so they won't feel smart.
Proverbs 29​
9 If a wise man has an argument with a fool, the fool only rages and laughs, and there is no quiet.​
I confess v4 & v5 take some discernment.
Here is how the NWT renders those verses...
“Do not answer the stupid one according to his foolishness,
So that you do not put yourself on his level.
5 Answer the stupid one according to his foolishness,
So that he does not think he is wise.”


Proverbs 29:9..
“When a wise man enters into a controversy with a fool,
There will be ranting and ridicule, but no satisfaction.”


Patience and thoroughness must be what we offer to those we respond to, but especially on these forums do we need to explain the scriptures thoroughly, because of the readers here who are standing behind the person we are responding to......it is for their benefit that I continue. To show them that there is a reasonable explanation for everything......it has been my life’s purpose to not only know what the Bible says.....but more importantly, to understand WHY God says it, and how it relates to everything else in his word.

Ranting and ridicule are what identifies the stupid one.....who will never be satisfied with any explanation but their own. They will stick by their prickly cactus and ignore the truths passing them by...... :no reply:
 

Cassandra

Well-Known Member
Sep 24, 2021
2,606
2,968
113
Midwest
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
They "slept with his fathers".


Isaiah 14:1-11
Easy-to-Read Version
Israel Will Return Home
14 The Lord will again show his love to Jacob. He will again choose the people of Israel. He will give them their land. Then the non-Israelites[a] will join the Israelites, and both will become one family—Jacob’s family. 2 Those nations will bring the Israelites back to their land. The men and women from the other nations will become slaves to Israel. In the past, those people forced the Israelites to become their slaves. But in the future the Israelites will defeat those nations, and Israel will then rule over them in the Lord’s land. 3 In the past, you were slaves. People forced you to work hard. But the Lord will take away the hard work you were forced to do.

A Song About the King of Babylon
4 At that time you will begin to sing this song about the king of Babylon:

The king was cruel when he ruled us,
but now his rule is finished.
5 The Lord breaks the scepter of evil rulers;
he takes away their power.
6 In anger, the king of Babylon beat the people.
He never stopped beating them.
He was an evil ruler who ruled in anger.
He never stopped hurting people.
7 But now, the whole country rests and is quiet.
Now the people begin to celebrate.
8 You were an evil king,
and now you are finished.
Even the pine trees are happy.
The cedar trees of Lebanon rejoice.
They say, “The king chopped us down,
but now the king has fallen,
and he will never stand again.”
9 The place of death is excited
that you are coming.
Sheol is waking the spirits
of all the leaders of the earth for you.
Sheol is making the kings stand up
from their thrones to meet you.
10 They will make fun of you, saying,
“Now you are as dead as we are.
Now you are just like us.”
11 Your pride has been sent down to Sheol.
The music from your harps announces the coming of your proud spirit.
Maggots will be the bed you lie on,
and other worms will cover your body like a blanket.
They slept with their fathers because death is a sleep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aunty Jane

Ronald Nolette

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
12,655
3,756
113
69
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
How do you know that it is wrong? Who told you it was? You assume that it must be wrong because it disagrees with what you have been told that it means.....so who told you?
Think back and ask who it was who told Jesus and his disciples that what they were teaching was wrong?
Who told them?
Who told you it was a parable? How do you know the watchtower opinion of this is the correct one? YOu assume it must be right because it came from the Watchtower.
xactly, and the rich man and Lazarus is no exception. Since Jesus was Jewish, this parable related to the Pharisees and the “lost sheep” to who Jesus was sent, it makes complete sense because the Jews had no concept of heaven or hell and Jesus would not have taught something that the Hebrew Scriptures never mentioned. The ancient Jews believed in resurrection, not immortality of the soul.
Wrong again, but don't let truth stop you from promoting watchtower lies. Jews knew of Abrhams bosom and the place of torments. They di dnot hold to a heavenly hope, for that was not revealed yet! Thinking themselves wise, the watchtower became fools.
Are you serious? Read it in situ.....it is surrounded by other parables.....as illustrations were Jesus’ favored mode of teaching. To accept your interpretation is to deny what the Jewish scriptures taught, and what Jewish belief about life after death involved.
When Jesus’ friend Lazarus died, where did he go? Where did Jesus say that he was? (John 11:11-14)
What did Lazarus’ sister confirm was Jewish belief about the death and resurrection?
Illustrations were not jesus favorite mode of teaching. He started teaching in parables to hide the truth from the masses. If the watchtower lie was ture, there would be some fragment of it somewhere in history- but no!

It does not matter it has parables around it when it was written. Once again, the language, the construct and the uniqueness of this tell sus it is a true account.

Because there is a total lack of comparative terminology- when Jesus said "there was a man"- we know there was a man! Jesus is not done and because He knows the future, He would have spoken plain enough to avoid this controversy. You forget Jesus knows how to tell a parable and how to tell a true account.
 
Last edited:

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
5,189
2,312
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Who told you it was a parable?
The scriptures themselves tell me it is a parable because it is included with a multitude of other parables in that chapter and in the preceding ones....its not rocket science, unless of course you are trying to promote something that isn't true.
There is no belief in 'heaven or hell' in any Jewish scripture....why? because Jews were never taught about immortality of the soul.
Death was overcome by resurrection, not by a spiritual part of humanity that continues to live on somewhere else. The resurrection was to take place under the rule of the Messianic Kingdom. Jesus spoke of the resurrection as something future. (John 5:28-29)
Jews knew of Abrhams bosom and the place of torments. They di dnot hold to a heavenly hope, for that was not revealed yet!
Which "Jews" are we talking about here? The ancient ones to whom God's word was originally given? Or the ones who conspired to have their Messiah put to death?
Why did Jesus condemn those Pharisees to "gehenna"....was it because they were teaching the truth...? (Matthew 15:7-9; Matthew 23:33)
What say you?
Illustrations were not jesus favorite mode of teaching.
Matthew 13:34-35...KJV...
"All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them:
35 That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world."

Someone is looking a little foolish now....:doldrums:
It does not matter it has parables around it when it was written. Once again, the language, the construct and the uniqueness of this tell sus it is a true account.
Really? This is the only parable that wasn't a parable.....? OK, if that's what you want to believe...who am I to dissuade you? :hmhehm
 

Ronald Nolette

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
12,655
3,756
113
69
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
What???? The 144,000 are clearly mentioned in Revelation as being those “chosen from among mankind as firstfruits”....which for an agricultural people was very familiar terminology. “Firstfruits” were the pick of the crop...the very best and choicest......the secondary fruits came later. Still good but not as choice as the firstfruits. (Rev 14:1-5) Those of the elect are clearly said to be “resurrected first”. (Rev 20:6)
Yes in the context of the end times. They are chosen after the first 6 seals are opened which are end times events! They are 144,000 Jewish male virgins from 12 tribes. That is the bible, what the watchtower teaches is not the bible but their opinion.
The scriptures themselves tell me it is a parable because it is included with a multitude of other parables in that chapter and in the preceding ones....its not rocket science, unless of course you are trying to promote something that isn't true.
There is no belief in 'heaven or hell' in any Jewish scripture....why? because Jews were never taught about immortality of the soul.
Death was overcome by resurrection, not by a spiritual part of humanity that continues to live on somewhere else. The resurrection was to take place under the rule of the Messianic Kingdom. Jesus spoke of the resurrection as something future. (John 5:28-29)
I guess for you it is rocket science. The whole 16 th chapter prior is not one parable told.

Luke 16

King James Version

16 And he said also unto his disciples, There was a certain rich man, which had a steward;

This Jesus spoke to His disciples so it would be a plain teaching, which is why He said "There was a man" For there was a man.

Remember the purpose of the parables:

Matt. 13:
10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?

11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.

12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.

13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.

14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:

15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

Parables are to hide the truth from the masses, not the disciples.

BTW Luke 17 also has no parables- so you lie when you say Lazarus is surrounded by parables.
Which "Jews" are we talking about here? The ancient ones to whom God's word was originally given? Or the ones who conspired to have their Messiah put to death?
Why did Jesus condemn those Pharisees to "gehenna"....was it because they were teaching the truth...? (Matthew 15:7-9; Matthew 23:33)
What say you?
The Jews of Jesus day. there were many things the early Jews to whom a portion of teh OT was given to write did not know and were later revealed. Should we reject the fact that Jew and Gentile are one body in christ because teh Jews did not know this until the New Testament. This ia false argument.
Matthew 13:34-35...KJV...
"All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable spake he not unto them:
35 That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world."

Too bad you did n't quote the context so you would know the why He spoke in parables.

10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?

11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.

12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.

13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.

14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:

15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.

16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.

17 For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.

And this chapter is filled with parables- but not Luke with Lazarus. Yes you are looking foolish now!
Really? This is the only parable that wasn't a parable.....? OK, if that's what you want to believe...who am I to dissuade you?
Really! But until the blinders are taken of your watchtower masters, yours will remain.
 

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
5,189
2,312
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
They are 144,000 Jewish male virgins from 12 tribes.
Since the 144,000 are all of the elect, chosen from the first century, right up to “the time of the end”, it includes the apostles and all the first century Christians who received the “heavenly calling”. (Hebrews 3:1)

Were the apostles Jewish virgins? Were those of the elect only male virgins? The apostle Peter was married, so was he a virgin? He would not have been the only one since Jewish society expected marriage and children as these were seen a a blessing from God. So, it can’t be physical virginity.

Women are also part of the elect. Upon their resurrection, when they gain their spirit bodies, there is no longer any gender, (which is only for reproduction).....the virginity mentioned is spiritual....they are “virgins” in the spiritual sense, untainted by the false ideas proffered by satan’s ‘weedy’ imitation “Christianity” which took over “the church” after the last apostle, John passed away. Their restraining influence remained until the last contribution to the NT canon was written at the end of the first century.

It is the “weeds” who are gathered first in this parable.....do you understand that one? (Matthew 13:24-30)
Jesus gave the disciples the explanation because they asked about it. (V 36-43)
We can see it’s fulfilment even though Christendom behaves as if it never happened.

I guess for you it is rocket science. The whole 16 th chapter prior is not one parable told.
It begins with a parable....Luke 14-16 are filled with these illustrations.
BTW Luke 17 also has no parables- so you lie when you say Lazarus is surrounded by parables.
The rich man and Lazarus is the last one in ch 16.....read all the parables in the previous chapters.
Taken literally, this parable is quite ridiculous....

The Jews of Jesus day. there were many things the early Jews to whom a portion of teh OT was given to write did not know and were later revealed. Should we reject the fact that Jew and Gentile are one body in christ because teh Jews did not know this until the New Testament. This ia false argument.
False? Or just inconvenient? The ancient Jews to whom God originally gave his laws, had NO belief in ‘heaven or hell’. That was never in the original plan. Go back to Genesis and see what God purposed at the beginning.....tell me where Adam was ever told about heaven or hell?
There is no Hebrew scripture that offers anything to Israel but “life or death”. (Deuteronomy 30:19-20)
Adam was only told about life or death.....he was not given a “soul”, but “became” one when God started him breathing. Since there is no mention of an “immortal soul” in the scriptures, where did this idea come from? We need to ask these questions...or we will swallow whatever seems like a reasonable explanation if we want to believe it. The Bible explains itself if you just let it.
Too bad you did n't quote the context so you would know the why He spoke in parables.
He told us why he spoke in parables and as I mentioned, he explained some, and others he did not.
Since ‘no one can come to the Son without an invitation from his his Father’.....it is God who chooses us as much as we think that we choose him. (John 6:44; 65)

I love the way you disparage my brotherhood and infer that I have been brainwashed by them....but can I ask, who brainwashed you? You simply parrot off what one part of your own disunited denomination teaches.....as if you could not possibly be wrong. Is confidence the only mark of a true Christian?

Like I have often said...Jesus will be the judge of what we have come to accept as truth....we can’t rely on our own opinion because Jesus tells us that we can be so badly misled, just as the Jews of Jesus’ day were. Those who rejected the truth back then didn’t believe that they had been misled...they had confidence in their teachers too....
At the end Jesus tells us that “many” who were confident in their beliefs, will be completely rejected as those he NEVER knew. “Never” means “not ever”.....at no time were they his own. They are completely oblivious....sobering...isn’t it?

So, let’s allow the judge to do his job because it won’t be obvious until that day, if we have been fooling ourselves all along......(Matthew 7:21-23) God has either chosen to draw us to the truth, or to leave us to our delusions. (2 Thessalonians 2:9-12) That is his choice...not ours.
 

Ronald Nolette

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2020
12,655
3,756
113
69
South Carolina
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Since the 144,000 are all of the elect, chosen from the first century, right up to “the time of the end”, it includes the apostles and all the first century Christians who received the “heavenly calling”. (Hebrews 3:1)

Were the apostles Jewish virgins? Were those of the elect only male virgins? The apostle Peter was married, so was he a virgin? He would not have been the only one since Jewish society expected marriage and children as these were seen a a blessing from God. So, it can’t be physical virginity.

Women are also part of the elect. Upon their resurrection, when they gain their spirit bodies, there is no longer any gender, (which is only for reproduction).....the virginity mentioned is spiritual....they are “virgins” in the spiritual sense, untainted by the false ideas proffered by satan’s ‘weedy’ imitation “Christianity” which took over “the church” after the last apostle, John passed away. Their restraining influence remained until the last contribution to the NT canon was written at the end of the first century.
Well that is what the Watchtower tells you , you must believe, but that is not what Gods Word says!

If you wish to believe in a reinterpretation of SCripture- that is your business. but when you call it the Word of God, then it becomes my business and I will resist the Watchtower lies fiercely- for they are lies.

I told you why the Watchtower is lying, you choose to believe it- that is fine. The one thing that time will show- is how they have decieved you to your own harm- no matter how nice and how religiously zealous they are!

But I await your proof from history, how when John died at teh end of the first century, th echurch went to hell in a handbasket. Until you show tha tproof, please do not add any other things to discuss, for I won't discuss them.

You made a claim, now please back it by proof and not opinion and conjecture!

I have seen from you and other JW's here hwo the 144,000 are culled form nearly 2000 years of history and the allegorizing of the number 144,000 and Jewish male virgins, but why hasn't the watchtower indoctrinated you into the meaning of this part of that passage:

Revelation 7

King James Version

7 And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.
2 And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of the living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea,
3 Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads.
4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.
5 Of the tribe of Juda were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand.
6 Of the tribe of Aser were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nephthalim were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses were sealed twelve thousand.
7 Of the tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand.
8 Of the tribe of Zabulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.
9 After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands;

So to believe the Watchtower:

1. These angels have been hanging around nearly 2 millenia.
2. Israel doesn't mean Israel
3. the names of the tribes do not mean the names of teh tribes.
4. The 12,000 are what?????????????????????????????
5. the great crowd come out of the great tribulation.

Now for this passage:

Revelation 14

King James Version

14 And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads.
2 And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps:
3 And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth.
4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.

1. being defiled with women doe snot mean being defiled with women
2. Being men does not mean being men.
3. Being virgins does not mean being eunuchs for the kingdom.

I am so sorry your god had a bad day when He inspired this to be written. but THE God of the Universe knows how to write and does not need a man made organization founded by a habadasher to reinterpret His Word for HIm.
 

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
5,189
2,312
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Well that is what the Watchtower tells you , you must believe, but that is not what Gods Word says!
No verse can be isolated from what the Bible teaches in its entirety....its one story with a beginning, a middle and and end.....I believe what the whole Bible tells me and since God was its author I will allow scripture to interpret itself.

We all need teachers Ron, even Jesus had a teacher, whom he identified as his Father. He taught his disciples, and they in turn taught others....that is how Christianity was to spread out "to the most distant part of the earth".

As part of the 'end time' prophesies, Jesus said he was going to appoint "a faithful and wise servant" who was to "feed" his entire household their "food at the proper time" (Matt 24:45).....since we are now well into the time of the end, that slave has been busy "doing the will of the Father" all this time.

Because the prophesies in the book of Daniel are applied exclusively to "the time of the end", we were to see that an 'abundance of knowledge' was to be provided to Jesus' true disciples, who would be led out of corrupt Christendom, just as Jesus' first disciples were led out of corrupt Judaism....and for the same reasons. (Matt15:7-9)

There was to be a 'cleansing purifying and refining' of God's worshippers in this time period, and this in turn would provide the basis for the separation of the 'sheep from the goats'......(Daniel 12:4; 9-10)
If you wish to believe in a reinterpretation of SCripture- that is your business. but when you call it the Word of God, then it becomes my business and I will resist the Watchtower lies fiercely- for they are lies.
What you don't seem to understand is that there was already a 'reinterpretation of scripture', so long ago that most people don't know that what they have been led to believe for hundreds of years by an apostate church, is all lies.
The sower of the "weeds" is a master of deception and he has had the advantage of time up his sleeve....thousands of years.
I told you why the Watchtower is lying, you choose to believe it- that is fine. The one thing that time will show- is how they have decieved you to your own harm- no matter how nice and how religiously zealous they are!
You can make all the accusations you like...its water off a duck's back...this is exactly what Jesus foretold for his true disciples....."hated" for being real "Christians". (John 15:18-21) Think back to the first century and ask who were Jesus' biggest critics? Wasn't it those who claimed to worship the same God?
"There is nothing new under the sun" Solomon said.....and the devil knows what works on humans, because he has been deceiving them for millennia. Do the deceived know that they are?....not usually until its too late. Will God prevent us from being deceived? NO! he will not, because we will be drawn to what is already in our hearts. That is how the separation takes place....."no matter how nice and how religiously zealous they are!"...the truth will not change because God doesn't change.
But I await your proof from history, how when John died at teh end of the first century, th echurch went to hell in a handbasket. Until you show tha tproof, please do not add any other things to discuss, for I won't discuss them.
Oh dear, what rock have you been hiding under....do some research on the activities of "the church" from the beginning of the second century.
The foretold apostasy was already beginning whilst the apostles were still alive, but after their death "while men were sleeping" the devil watered the seeds he had already sown and like any gardener knows, weeds will take over a garden that is not tended. The church watered the weeds and the garden was a mess for many centuries. The birth of Christendom was official in the fourth century when a pagan Roman emperor turned "Christianity" into something Jesus did not even recognize.

For 1500 years "the church" went from corruption to corruption and still does. Then a Catholic priest named Martin Luther got fed up with the corruption he saw....he was indignant about the sale of indulgences. He knew that men cannot bargain with God. In the autumn of 1517, he wrote his famous 95 theses, accusing the church of financial, doctrinal, and religious abuse. Wanting to encourage reform, rather than rebellion, Luther sent copies of his theses to Archbishop Albert of Mainz and to several scholars. Many historians point to 1517 or thereabouts as the birth of the Reformation.

So what did the Reformation accomplish as far as cleaning up "the church" and uniting the Christians after so long a period where the Bible was not available to the common people....forbidden under penalty of death. What a wonderful environment for the "weeds" to flourish.
 

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
5,189
2,312
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
So to believe the Watchtower:

1. These angels have been hanging around nearly 2 millenia.
2. Israel doesn't mean Israel
3. the names of the tribes do not mean the names of teh tribes.
4. The 12,000 are what?????????????????????????????
5. the great crowd come out of the great tribulation.
Don't look now but angels dwell in the spirit realm where time doesn't mean much......they are not governed by the rotation of our little planet.
When humankind sinned in the garden, how long did it take for the Christ to come......the seed of promise in genesis 3:15?
Now how long has it been since Christ went to heaven and he promised to come back for his elect.....you can see that time is only relevant to us earthbound mortal humans. According to 2 Peter 3:8, our whole existence hasn't even been a week, to God.

Jesus' words to the Jewish religious leaders of his day...
Matthew 21:42-43...
"Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof."


Paul tells that "Israel" doesn't mean fleshly Israel.....plainly stated.
Romans 2:28-29...
"For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God
."
(KJV)
Paul identifies "the Israel of God" as Christians from both Jewish and Gentile backgrounds. (Gal 6:16)

That nation "bringing forth" the right "fruits" was the Christian congregation of Jesus' followers, both Jewish and Gentile.

The Bible clearly identifies two groups who inherit salvation through the blood of Christ.....the 144,000 are seen on heavenly Mt Zion with Jesus, whilst "the great crowd" which was left unnumbered, are seen as survivors of "the great tribulation" which occurs on earth. (Rev 7: 9-10, 13-14)
The elect are 144,000, chosen from among mankind as "firstfruits" (Rev 14:3-4)....who are resurrected "first" (Rev 20:6) and their subjects will be the earthly survivors of the greatest catastrophe the world has ever seen....soon to take place by all accounts.....(Matthew 24:21)....these will be joined later by those who experience the general resurrection of the dead, (both the righteous and the unrighteous) which includes the faithful ones of old mentioned in Heb 11. (John 5:28-29)
No one went to heaven before Jesus. (John 3:13)
1. being defiled with women doe snot mean being defiled with women
2. Being men does not mean being men.
3. Being virgins does not mean being eunuchs for the kingdom.
When Israel turned to idolatry, God accused them of adultery....no women were necessary for that accusation. (Jeremiah 3:8-9; 5:7; 9:2) The adultery was spiritual....worshipping false gods.

What place have "men" in heaven?
Gal 3:26-29....KJV...
26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise."


See.....no gender, no nationality, no economic status...just one body of Christ....all classified as "Abraham's seed", yet many are Gentiles.

Rev 14:3-4 says...
"And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth.
4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb."


Spiritual virgins, not literal male virgins....
Chkl:

I am so sorry your god had a bad day when He inspired this to be written. but THE God of the Universe knows how to write and does not need a man made organization founded by a habadasher to reinterpret His Word for HIm.
So how is it that your "man made organization" has credence and mine does not? I am not aware that a haberdasher would be any less acceptable to Christ than the humble fishermen whom he chose as his apostles......what snobbery! (Luke 10:21)

Did it ever occur to you that the truth meant going back to what was said in the first century, not the distorted rot that came later? All we did was go back to the beginning and start again, comparing "church" teachings to Bible teachings......"the church" and all her daughters, were found to be in error about everything....what else would you expect from the master deceiver.....? He can make black look white....and lies look like truth.

Be careful about what you assume....and who told you what you think is the truth....
 
Last edited:

Dropship

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2022
2,213
1,514
113
76
Plymouth UK
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
The elect are 144,000, chosen from among mankind as "firstfruits" (Rev 14:3-4)....who are resurrected "first" (Rev 20:6) and their subjects will be the earthly survivors of the greatest catastrophe the world has ever seen..

Will the '144,000' be JW's ruling over their "subjects"?
I don't think true Christians want to lord it over anybody..;)
"Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit...Be shepherds of God’s flock that is under your care, watching over them, not because you must, but because you are willing, as God wants you to be; not pursuing dishonest gain, but eager to serve; not lording it over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock." (2 Cor 2:17,1 Peter 5:2-3)
 

ElieG12

Well-Known Member
Oct 8, 2022
915
266
63
Atlanta
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Better than think what we want, we must think on what God will do.

(ASV) Dan. 7:
13 I saw in the night-visions, and, behold, there came with the clouds of heaven one like unto a son of man, and he came even to the ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.
14 And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all the peoples, nations, and languages should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.
18 But the saints of the Most High shall receive the kingdom, and possess the kingdom for ever, even for ever and ever.
21 I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them; 22 until the ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the Most High, and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom.

(The Bible in Living English) Rev. 5:
9 And they sing a new song, “Worthy you are to take the book and open its seals, because you were slaughtered and bought men for God with your blood out of every tribe and language and people and race, 10 and made them a kingdom and priests for our God, and they shall reign on the earth.”

I don't think we can tell God what to do. We must know what He says He will do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aunty Jane

Aunty Jane

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2021
5,189
2,312
113
Sydney
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Will the '144,000' be JW's ruling over their "subjects"?
I don't think true Christians want to lord it over anybody..;)
"Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit...Be shepherds of God’s flock that is under your care, watching over them, not because you must, but because you are willing, as God wants you to be; not pursuing dishonest gain, but eager to serve; not lording it over those entrusted to you, but being examples to the flock." (2 Cor 2:17,1 Peter 5:2-3)
I sometimes wonder about the things you assume Dropship old man....
This is, I believer where non denominationalism lets you down.....you basically have to become your own teacher, and within a very loose framework, reading words in the Bible without someone to explain them, allows the individual to come to their own conclusions. What results? Thousands of “Christian” sects all following a man (or woman) who claims to have God’s spirit. That of course is absolute nonsense because, if God’s spirit was guiding them, they would all believe and teach the same truths.....do they? Does God speak with a forked tongue or is that the other guy?

If you look back in Bible history, you will see that God always provided teachers who were shepherds and guides of his people.....NEVER were they left to guide themselves because that is where they always came undone.
When Israel demanded a human king like the nations had, he told them what the drawbacks would be but it did not dissuade them.....it turns out that giving men power over others always corrupts them. When good kings reigned, the people were blessed and when bad kings ruled the whole nation suffered because of that unfaithful king. What was the problem? Humanity’s fallen condition did not make for rulership to be anything but trouble....even to this day, human rulers are always failures because we are not designed to rule one another....God designed us to be ruled by Him.

What was the admonition in the scripture you quoted?
As this was given to Christians, there were no rulers in Christianity, just shepherds who were to humbly acknowledge their own faults when guiding others. They were to be spiritually qualified men chosen because of their faithful adherence to Christ’s teachings. What were they told to do? To be shepherds whilst in the flesh, mindful of their own failings......but for the elect, those who were given the hope of ruling as Christ in heaven, their flawed mortality was to give way to sinless immortality, having proven “faithful to death”....the “crown of life” meant the ability to be incorruptible. As such God has appointed them to be “kings and priests” with Christ in heaven. (Rev 20:6)

So now ask the same question with that viewpoint.
“Will the '144,000' be JW's ruling over their "subjects"?
What is a JW? Is that designation a mere label like Christendom’s denominations? It cannot be or we would be like all the rest.....we are clearly not. We do not hold the same beliefs, nor do we follow the same traditions that Christendom clings to in spite of their knowing that these are adopted from paganism.

Being one of Jehovah’s Witnesses is a choice to take up the torture stake of the Christ and carry his unpopular message out to the world, knowing full well that it will mean painting a target on our back.
Jesus told his disciples that the “road to life” was “cramped” and the entry “narrow”.....what makes it so? How many “Christians” here actually experience the kind of treatment that Jesus said would (not might) come?

John 15:18-21...
I am giving you these commands so that you may love each other. 18 If the world hates you, you know it has hated me before you. 19 If you belonged to the world, the world would love what was its own; but because you do not belong to the world but I picked you out of the world, for that reason the world hates you. 20 Remember the words that I said to you, ‘a servant is not greater than his master’: if they persecuted me, so they will you; if they kept my words, so they will yours. 21 But all this they will do to you on account of my name, because they do not know the one who sent me.” (BLE)

Do Christians in this world truly love one another? (John 13:34-35) What does it take for them to show that they do? If a war is declared for example, and nations go out to fight their enemies, do they show their fellow Christians of that nation how much they love them by dropping bombs on them, and sending missiles to destroy their lives and homes?

We will not go to war for any nation because it is against Christ’s teachings. (Matthew 5:43-44) Our “enemies” are not people of other nations.....the world will fight its own wars.

So many people think that being a “Christian” is something that they can turn on and off like a faucet....those who blindly hold to beliefs that the Bible does not teach....those who pick up their “Christianity” at the door of their church, and leave it there on their way out. These are the true enemies of Christ....promoting the teachings of satan’s ‘weedy’ imitation Christianity......the one Jesus warned us about. (Matthew 13:24-30; 36-43) That crop was not sown recently.

We are merely messengers....not judges of other people’s destiny. Like Jesus, we tell an unpopular truth and receive the same treatment that he and his disciples did, because we teach something ‘foreign’ and different to the mainstream. We don’t force people to believe what we say, because we don’t have to......Jesus just stated the facts and allowed people to come to their own conclusions....God will do the rest.

So because Jesus was a teacher who was also the designated King of God’s Kingdom, we welcome his rulership over us, along with those chosen by God to assist him.....but we also acknowledge that we have “shepherds” on earth who do not act as kings and priests before they attain their “heavenly calling”.

We are told however....
“Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith. . . . . Obey your leaders and submit to them, for they are keeping watch over your souls, as those who will have to give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with groaning, for that would be of no advantage to you.” (Hebrews 13:7, 17 ESV)

Shepherds still have responsibilities to the owner of the sheep, guiding them to good pasturage and uncontaminated water sources.
 
Last edited:

Dropship

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2022
2,213
1,514
113
76
Plymouth UK
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
I sometimes wonder about the things you assume Dropship old man....
This is, I believe where non denominationalism lets you down.....you basically have to become your own teacher, and within a very loose framework, reading words in the Bible without someone to explain them, allows the individual to come to their own conclusions.

We non-denoms have got Jesus as our teacher, so if you don't think he's good enough you better argue it out with him when you meet him..:)
Jesus said-"You have one teacher, me" (Matt 23:10)
As for needing somebody to explain him, nah, he's easy to understand..:)-
"And the common people heard him gladly" (Mark 12:37)
 
  • Love
Reactions: Keturah

Dropship

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2022
2,213
1,514
113
76
Plymouth UK
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
..Being one of Jehovah’s Witnesses is a choice to take up the torture stake of the Christ..

You JW's have got some oddball ideas, like he was crucified on a stake and not on a cross.
Careful, the naughty step..:)-
"The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God" (1 Cor 1:18)
 
  • Love
Reactions: Keturah

Dropship

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2022
2,213
1,514
113
76
Plymouth UK
Faith
Christian
Country
United Kingdom
We are told however....
“Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith. . . . . Obey your leaders and submit to them.." (Hebrews 13:7, 17 ESV)

Sadly many churches and their leaders are like cuckoo's nests, so I'm sure God wouldn't want us to submit to them..:)
"He who walks with the wise grows wise, but a companion of fools suffers harm" (Proverbs 13:20)