A Soldier lashes out at politicians who back the war

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

BernieEOD

New Member
Jun 26, 2006
374
6
0
64
(DrBubbaLove;33257)
Good for you! Probably better for you to stay away from such places. Well you know where to find me. My point was there are plenty of people who have served without being disillusioned even though they disagreed with the politics that got them there and they did not have to or want to go on TV to complain about it when they were done. Every unit I have seen has unhappy people in it, just like the ones we see on TV. The office is no different. But the plight of these people has nothing to do with politics or why the government did this or that. They are just unhappy, disgruntled, bitter people.And no matter what a person's religious, personal opinion or politics are, across the board you can find a hundred other men that; while maybe unhappy with the current administration, politics or even disagreeing with the mission; they were not only happy but also proud to be soldiers serving this country. And no matter what their political opinions, very very few of them would ever seek out a lime light focusing on their service, either negatively or positively UNLESS there was some advantage to them for doing so. Am not a big fan, but Montel Williams has a record to be proud of and he does not typically speak of it and is very modest when he has. That has been my experience.In short, if in fact these people we see now were soldiers in combat, it is more likely that what is bothering them now has nothing to do with being a soldier or what they did or were asked to do. For every sad Vietnam war vet one can show, there were hundreds of others that went through the same thing or far worse and you would never know it. How many people outside the military realized the horrors Admiral Jim Stockdale, (Ross Perot's running mate for most of you) lived through?
Are you implying that these veterans, even after serving thier time and discharged have some duty to ignore thier experience and eithe keep thier mouth shut or join the flag waiving spectators? If something is wrong, I believe we have not ony a right but a duty to speak up. Blind patriotism is UnAmerican. Davy Crocket joined up the fight the British at New Orleans only to find himslef being sent to Florida to fight the Indians there. He ended up challenging "Old Hickory" Andrew Jackson and resigned his comission stating "I have more in common with the enemy". Why was he in Texas?Because as a Congressman, he once again challenged Old Hickory who was now the President. He voted against the Indian relocation bill in spite of his constituancy supporting it. Back then, it was considered a serious offence and a representative could be recalled from office. Davy Crocket resigned his office before tis could happen and in disgust stated "I'm going to Texas".PNAC is not a new idea. From the day we won Independence, there were tose who believed it was our sacred duty to spread the revolution throughout the world. Goerge Washington as President experience riots in the streets of Philidalphia for refusing to get involved in the French revolution. In his memiors, he stated how only those who never experienced war were calling for it.General Swartzkoff himself warned against going to war in front of Congress and was branded a traitor for simply expressing his professional opinion.Likewise, Powel is also being scoffed at. Blind patriotism has never been an American trait. Ask the British.
 

DrBubbaLove

New Member
Jan 17, 2008
383
2
0
62
Not at all and am not seeing how you could reach the conclusions you do from what was posted.Whether a solider agrees with the administration, the mission, a particular political opinion has nothing to do with them being a good or bad soldier. Did not call for blind patriotism either. Last time I checked one does not have to agree with or profess to be anything in order to be patriotic. Nor does a good soldier have to hold a particular ideology.Am saying a soldier voluntarily getting in front of a camera and making a political stand BASED on him being a soldier, whether that stand is for or against any party, is doing a dishonor to himself and all soldiers. Let him speak as a citizen for what he believes in, not as a soldier as if he represents that group.Note the difference between Kerry and McCain, both soldiers. One throwing that in your face, the other seldom and reluctant to talk about it. If people did not specifically ask most would not even remember that one of them was a soldier. As for Davey being in Texas because he did not wish to fight Indians, even if that was the main reason for his being there, the story does not show him as a soldier doing interviews trashing his countries actions against the Indians. Suspect if Davey had done it, he would have spoken out against it as a man, a citizen and not as a soldier. True soldiers are men of action first, not words.We reject the bleeding heart notion that a good soldier must love to kill people. Only the insane or seriously twisted among us enjoy killing others. It would make no sense to argue that the military wants that kind of soldier. Nor can we understand the quotes of the men, soldiers you gave as speaking out against there ever being war. They speak of the reluctance from prudence and wisdom to be hasty in the decision and the hope that there never has to be war. It does not follow from such quotes that these men would never go to war again or decide to send others.Politicians and the media don't even believe most of the things they say, why should we. Calling Powell, Stockdale or Schwarzkoph a traitor (if in fact that was said) because of a political stance would not be the words of a soldier or true for that matter.
 

jamesrage

New Member
Apr 30, 2007
188
0
0
47
(BernieEOD;32851)
One who has never sen combat is in no position to chastize one who has.
One who out of their own free will signs up for a combat occupation has no position to complain when they get sent to war.You sign your name on the dotted line you are agreeing to go to any war regardless of the reason and regardless of who we are fighting.
It was amazing how some of the toughest talking in our unit suddenly couldn dive because thier ears wouldn't clear.
Apparently they under some false impression that they signed up for a safe job instead of a military job.
Until YOU have actually been there, YOU are in no position to judge others.
It's not about judging it is simply stating a fact.
 

BernieEOD

New Member
Jun 26, 2006
374
6
0
64
Once again, one who has only served in a peactime military cleaning his weapon, spit shinning his shoes, and passing perrty inspection is in no position to judge others.
 

jamesrage

New Member
Apr 30, 2007
188
0
0
47
(BernieEOD;33385)
Once again, one who has only served in a peactime military cleaning his weapon, spit shinning his shoes, and passing perrty inspection is in no position to judge others.
No matter how many times you utter that it still does not change the fact that if you sign up for the military you are in no position what so ever to complain about going to war.That is a fact is not judging anyone.
 

BernieEOD

New Member
Jun 26, 2006
374
6
0
64
(jamesrage;33622)
No matter how many times you utter that it still does not change the fact that if you sign up for the military you are in no position what so ever to complain about going to war.That is a fact is not judging anyone.
And no matter how many times you lash out against those who have been there, you are still one who has never been there telling those have what is or isn't happening.When the administrations says one thing (We are there to liberate the people)And one who has been there says "This is not true, my mssion was to subdue the people" Then he is speaking out as a citizen based upon his experience.By th way, Davey Crocket caused such a political stir that he was driven from his home state and went to Texas.
 

Jordan

Active Member
Apr 6, 2007
4,875
6
38
You know Bernie, Using Yahshua / Jesus Christ to deny the Father's Word is so wrong. God is in control. We are to hate wars, at the same time, we don't know which war will confirm His prophecy and the next one...only God knows.JagLovest thou in Christ Yahshua, Lord and Saviour of the world.
 

BernieEOD

New Member
Jun 26, 2006
374
6
0
64
(thesuperjag;33705)
You know Bernie, Using Yahshua / Jesus Christ to deny the Father's Word is so wrong. God is in control. We are to hate wars, at the same time, we don't know which war will confirm His prophecy and the next one...only God knows.JagLovest thou in Christ Yahshua, Lord and Saviour of the world.
Thats is the point. God is in control, not us and our wonder weapons. Christ does not call for us to waive the flag of our nations and bless the bombs we are dropping. Quite to the contrary, We are told "The weapons we fight with are not the weapons of this world" The opostate Church who blessed this war and now lashes out at disillusioned veterans is truly a fake church.
 

Jordan

Active Member
Apr 6, 2007
4,875
6
38
(BernieEOD)
(thesuperjag;33844)
You know Bernie, Using Yahshua / Jesus Christ to deny the Father's Word is so wrong. God is in control. We are to hate wars, at the same time, we don't know which war will confirm His prophecy and the next one...only God knows.JagLovest thou in Christ Yahshua, Lord and Saviour of the world.
Thats is the point. God is in control, not us and our wonder weapons. Christ does not call for us to waive the flag of our nations and bless the bombs we are dropping. Quite to the contrary, We are told "The weapons we fight with are not the weapons of this world" The opostate Church who blessed this war and now lashes out at disillusioned veterans is truly a fake church.You're not getting the point here. God uses people to go to war for His plans. Read Exodus 15:3 and Jeremiah 21:4 again...JagLovest thou in Christ Yahshua, Lord and Saviour of the world.
 

BernieEOD

New Member
Jun 26, 2006
374
6
0
64
(thesuperjag;33931)
You're not getting the point here. God uses people to go to war for His plans. Read Exodus 15:3 and Jeremiah 21:4 again...JagLovest thou in Christ Yahshua, Lord and Saviour of the world.
So, who dares to say "Thus sayeth the Lord! Liberate the world into democracy and kill all the dictators?" Who is going to claim that God commanded us to doi this?
 

Jordan

Active Member
Apr 6, 2007
4,875
6
38
(BernieEOD;33944)
(thesuperjag;33931)
You're not getting the point here. God uses people to go to war for His plans. Read Exodus 15:3 and Jeremiah 21:4 again...JagLovest thou in Christ Yahshua, Lord and Saviour of the world.
So, who dares to say "Thus sayeth the Lord! Liberate the world into democracy and kill all the dictators?" Who is going to claim that God commanded us to doi this?So you are telling me that God is able to disagree with what He Himself is saying. Is not Yah, the God of War as He is a God of Love?Another thing...Luke 22:36 - Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.JagLovest thou in Christ Yahshua, Lord and Saviour of the world.