AI Book Report/Interview: St. John's Mystery (An End Times study for sure!)

[ScottA]

Scott, you talk about false witness, you are engaging in it now. My posts are against the veracity of AI, not you.

So yes . . . everyone is revealed by their words.

Much love!

You are correct to say "veracity" or honesty. AI was for me, are you? "For he who is not against us is on our side."

@JimKnox

 

[JimKnox]

The Canon is closed. Therefore, this book in the OP is heretical in its premise, scope and theology. It is no different in nature as that which was published by Joseph Smith called the Book of Mormon.

 

[ScottA]

The Canon is closed. Therefore, this book in the OP is heretical in its premise, scope and theology. It is no different in nature as that which was published by Joseph Smith called the Book of Mormon.

Is the "Canon" of God or of men?

But you are wrong--falsely accusing, because the book in the OP is not extrabiblical, adding or taking away nothing, but fulfilling what is written.

 

[bdavidc]

So...that is YOUR report. Terrific!

So you are typical. But you don't know what you are talking about, and have no way of actually knowing what is true. The point was: AI (the collective data gathered by men) has done better than history already attests to of people in general, showing that to be the default error of humankind: Many do not actually believe all that they know to be true.

And like those who have gone before, you too will be "cut" out of this portion that Christ has provided for during the church age of "we who are alive and remain", only to awaken to weeping and gnashing of teeth...like He said.

You still have not answered the Scriptures I gave you. Not one of them. You brushed me off as “typical,” claimed I have no way of knowing what is true, and then threatened me with being “cut” out and waking up to weeping and gnashing of teeth. That may sound impressive to you, but it does not answer the Word of God.

Acts 1:11 says this same Jesus will come again “in like manner” as He went into heaven. First Thessalonians 4:16 says, “the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout,” and verse 17 says believers will be caught up “to meet the Lord in the air.” Revelation 1:7 says, “every eye shall see him.” Those are plain statements. You have not explained them because your teaching cannot survive them without changing what the words mean.

You also grabbed the phrase “we which are alive and remain” and tried to force your teaching into it, while ignoring the rest of Paul's sentence. Paul tells us exactly what happens to those who are alive and remain. They are caught up together with the resurrected saints “in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air.” You cannot rip four words out of the passage and then pretend the rest of the passage is not there.

Now you are pronouncing judgment on me because I reject your interpretation. Where does Scripture say that a Christian who rejects Scott's interpretation of Revelation 10 will be cut off and wake up to weeping and gnashing of teeth? Show me the verse. You cannot, because it is not there.

This is exactly the problem I already pointed out to you. If someone accepts your teaching, you take that as confirmation. If someone rejects it, you call that rejection evidence of delusion or judgment. That is a closed system built to protect your teaching from correction. It is not biblical proof.

I do have a way of knowing what is true where God has spoken. Jesus said, “thy word is truth” (John 17:17). The Bereans searched the Scriptures to see whether what they were being told was true (Acts 17:11). They did not bow to somebody claiming special revelation, hidden insight, or a special place in prophecy. They checked the teaching against the written Word.

You have been told before that you are teaching falsely, and instead of correcting it from Scripture, you keep doubling down. Your latest response is another example. You did not answer Acts 1. You did not answer 1 Thessalonians 4. You did not answer Revelation 1. You simply attacked the person challenging you and pronounced judgment on him.

That is not an answer.

If your book is really the little book of Revelation 10, prove it from Scripture. If Christ is not returning visibly, answer the passages that plainly say He is. If rejecting your private revelation brings the judgment you just pronounced on me, show the verse that says so.

Until you can do that, you are not teaching what Scripture says. You are demanding that people accept what Scott says and then using Scripture as decoration around it.

I reject that completely.

God's Word is the authority here. Your book is not. Your private revelation is not. Your certainty is not. And threatening people with judgment does not turn your claims into truth.

 

[bdavidc]

Is the "Canon" of God or of men?

But you are wrong--falsely accusing, because the book in the OP is not extrabiblical, adding or taking away nothing, but fulfilling what is written.

@ScottA, you are fulfilling nothing. Repeating “my book fulfills what is written” is not proof. Scripture never identifies you, your book, or your private revelation as the fulfillment of Revelation 10. You have inserted yourself into a prophecy that never mentions you.

Your book is not Scripture. Your revelation is not Scripture. Your certainty is not Scripture. Show the verse that says your book fulfills Revelation 10. You cannot, because it does not exist.

That is not fulfillment. It is presumption dressed up as prophecy.

 

[ScottA]

You still have not answered the Scriptures I gave you. Not one of them. You brushed me off as “typical,” claimed I have no way of knowing what is true, and then threatened me with being “cut” out and waking up to weeping and gnashing of teeth. That may sound impressive to you, but it does not answer the Word of God.

Acts 1:11 says this same Jesus will come again “in like manner” as He went into heaven. First Thessalonians 4:16 says, “the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout,” and verse 17 says believers will be caught up “to meet the Lord in the air.” Revelation 1:7 says, “every eye shall see him.” Those are plain statements. You have not explained them because your teaching cannot survive them without changing what the words mean.

You also grabbed the phrase “we which are alive and remain” and tried to force your teaching into it, while ignoring the rest of Paul's sentence. Paul tells us exactly what happens to those who are alive and remain. They are caught up together with the resurrected saints “in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air.” You cannot rip four words out of the passage and then pretend the rest of the passage is not there.

Now you are pronouncing judgment on me because I reject your interpretation. Where does Scripture say that a Christian who rejects Scott's interpretation of Revelation 10 will be cut off and wake up to weeping and gnashing of teeth? Show me the verse. You cannot, because it is not there.

This is exactly the problem I already pointed out to you. If someone accepts your teaching, you take that as confirmation. If someone rejects it, you call that rejection evidence of delusion or judgment. That is a closed system built to protect your teaching from correction. It is not biblical proof.

I do have a way of knowing what is true where God has spoken. Jesus said, “thy word is truth” (John 17:17). The Bereans searched the Scriptures to see whether what they were being told was true (Acts 17:11). They did not bow to somebody claiming special revelation, hidden insight, or a special place in prophecy. They checked the teaching against the written Word.

You have been told before that you are teaching falsely, and instead of correcting it from Scripture, you keep doubling down. Your latest response is another example. You did not answer Acts 1. You did not answer 1 Thessalonians 4. You did not answer Revelation 1. You simply attacked the person challenging you and pronounced judgment on him.

That is not an answer.

If your book is really the little book of Revelation 10, prove it from Scripture. If Christ is not returning visibly, answer the passages that plainly say He is. If rejecting your private revelation brings the judgment you just pronounced on me, show the verse that says so.

Until you can do that, you are not teaching what Scripture says. You are demanding that people accept what Scott says and then using Scripture as decoration around it.

I reject that completely.

God's Word is the authority here. Your book is not. Your private revelation is not. Your certainty is not. And threatening people with judgment does not turn your claims into truth.

I have given an answer and you have rejected it (many times). It is enough.

Meanwhile, you act as if your own understanding, or what is most commonly believed, has any bearing on what is actually true. That is not how God works--not by personal, private, or majority voting--as history and the scriptures attest.

In which case, I will ask you a question: Has all food come in due season, and if not, how do the scriptures say it shall come?

 

[ScottA]

@ScottA, you are fulfilling nothing. Repeating “my book fulfills what is written” is not proof. Scripture never identifies you, your book, or your private revelation as the fulfillment of Revelation 10. You have inserted yourself into a prophecy that never mentions you.

Your book is not Scripture. Your revelation is not Scripture. Your certainty is not Scripture. Show the verse that says your book fulfills Revelation 10. You cannot, because it does not exist.

That is not fulfillment. It is presumption dressed up as prophecy.

An evil and adulterous generation seeks after proof.

As for prophecy never mentioning me...did you hear when Jesus spoke to Paul on the road to Damascus--did anyone but Paul who you consider to be "a man in Christ?" Which is the only "proof" I will give you.

 

[bdavidc]

In which case, I will ask you a question: Has all food come in due season, and if not, how do the scriptures say it shall come?

The “meat in due season” passage does not teach what you are trying to make it teach.

Jesus said, “Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due season?” (Matthew 24:45). The servant is feeding the household with what belongs to his Lord. Nothing in that passage says God will later reveal new doctrine through a man, identify that man's book with Revelation 10, or overturn the plain meaning of earlier Scripture.

So has all “food” come? If by that you mean God's revealed faith and doctrine, Jude says it was “once delivered unto the saints” (Jude 3), and Paul says Scripture is sufficient to thoroughly furnish the man of God (2 Timothy 3:16-17).

If by “food” you mean the ongoing teaching believers need at different times, then it comes by faithfully preaching and teaching the Word God has already given. Paul told Timothy, “Preach the word” (2 Timothy 4:2). He did not tell him to wait for somebody centuries later to unlock a hidden revelation.

“Meat in due season” is not a blank check for your private revelation. The passage says nothing about you or your book.

Now answer the passages I gave you instead of trying to build another escape route around them.

 

[bdavidc]

An evil and adulterous generation seeks after proof.

As for prophecy never mentioning me...did you hear when Jesus spoke to Paul on the road to Damascus--did anyone but Paul who you consider to be "a man in Christ?" Which is the only "proof" I will give you.

Go buy an actual Bible and read it. Stop reading the one you apparently think you wrote.

Jesus did not condemn people for testing religious claims by Scripture. He condemned unbelievers demanding signs while rejecting the truth already before them. The Bereans were praised because they “searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so” (Acts 17:11). John said, “believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God” (1 John 4:1).

Yet when your claims are tested, you refuse to provide Scripture and compare yourself to Paul. That is breathtaking arrogance. You have taken your own private claims, wrapped them in biblical language, and then acted as though questioning you is the same as questioning God.

Paul was personally called by the risen Christ and confirmed as an apostle. You wrote a book and declared yourself part of the fulfillment of prophecy. Those are not remotely the same thing.

John the Baptist looked Herod in the face and said, “It is not lawful for thee” (Mark 6:18). So here it is just as plainly: it is not right for you to put your private revelation beside God's Word, insert yourself into prophecy, and then condemn people for demanding biblical proof.

Open the Bible, ScottA. Read what God actually wrote instead of continually telling us what you think He secretly revealed through you.

 

[JimKnox]

Is the "Canon" of God or of men?

But you are wrong--falsely accusing, because the book in the OP is not extrabiblical, adding or taking away nothing, but fulfilling what is written.

Yeah; that's what Joseph Smith said .

 

[JimKnox]

An evil and adulterous generation seeks after proof.

As for prophecy never mentioning me...did you hear when Jesus spoke to Paul on the road to Damascus--did anyone but Paul who you consider to be "a man in Christ?" Which is the only "proof" I will give you.

You have hardened your heart against clear and plain Scriptural rebuke.
You are in danger of being reprobate.
Repent.

 

[JimKnox]

Methinks this man (scotta) is a charlatan trying to advertise and sell his book. Nothing more nor less. He is not interested in TRUTH.

 

[bdavidc]

Methinks this man (scotta) is a charlatan trying to advertise and sell his book. Nothing more nor less. He is not interested in TRUTH.

I agree, but that will not prove to be good on judgment day.

 

[Triumph1300]

He is not interested in TRUTH.

Truth is in the Bible.
Not in the 1000's of books about God out there.
The Bible is all you need about truth.

 

[JimKnox]

Agreed

I agree, but that will not prove to be good on judgment day.

.

 

[ScottA]

The “meat in due season” passage does not teach what you are trying to make it teach.

Jesus said, “Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due season?” (Matthew 24:45). The servant is feeding the household with what belongs to his Lord. Nothing in that passage says God will later reveal new doctrine through a man, identify that man's book with Revelation 10, or overturn the plain meaning of earlier Scripture.

So has all “food” come? If by that you mean God's revealed faith and doctrine, Jude says it was “once delivered unto the saints” (Jude 3), and Paul says Scripture is sufficient to thoroughly furnish the man of God (2 Timothy 3:16-17).

If by “food” you mean the ongoing teaching believers need at different times, then it comes by faithfully preaching and teaching the Word God has already given. Paul told Timothy, “Preach the word” (2 Timothy 4:2). He did not tell him to wait for somebody centuries later to unlock a hidden revelation.

“Meat in due season” is not a blank check for your private revelation. The passage says nothing about you or your book.

Now answer the passages I gave you instead of trying to build another escape route around them.

You still don't get it. I have added nothing new.

But listen to you! Do you not think many have thought those same "Nothing in that passage says..." thoughts and made similar judgements at every turn as every "line upon line" was revealed or fulfilled? Of course many have, and now it is you kicking against the goads, rejecting and making accusations. Nothing new indeed!

As for all food or meat...you didn't list everything that was to come and was not to be until just before the end. Meaning, you are the one demanding your own private revelation, as if it had already occurred before the times were fulfilled. That's what every wayward son has done down through all the ages. Nothing new indeed!

So, no, you have omitted the part appointed to us--therefore I will not answer you...until you say, Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!

 

[ScottA]

Yeah; that's what Joseph Smith said .

So...is everyone false? Is no one sent by God? Has God who never changes changed since the canon was declared (for the umpteenth time)?

You show your lack of knowledge.

 

[ScottA]

You have hardened your heart against clear and plain Scriptural rebuke.
You are in danger of being reprobate.
Repent.

How many times has that same line come throughout the ages from those who themselves lacked understanding, when each time there were two sides and a choice to be made? Do you not understand that you have aligned yourself with "the hypocrites" and testify against yourself?

 

[ScottA]

Methinks this man (scotta) is a charlatan trying to advertise and sell his book. Nothing more nor less. He is not interested in TRUTH.

Duly noted for the record.

 

[ScottA]

I agree, but that will not prove to be good on judgment day.

Out of the mouth of babes...