Are Doctrines affected by Modern Versions

[Truther]

God did not become a sperm cell to mate with Mary's egg.

God does not lower himself to humans, nor does God have a human nature.

 

[101G]

!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Oh you're still here?.
well since you cannot answer John 1:3 and isaiah 44:24, let's zero in on your Genesis 1:26, it this your tri-une God yes or no?

looking for your answer.

PICJAG.

 

[Truther]

!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

David, God is not 3.
God is one Spirit, alone.
No 3 person(alities) etc.

 

[101G]

God did not become a sperm cell to mate with Mary's egg.

God does not lower himself to humans, nor does God have a human nature.

that's true, let stick with what he knows best, ok. and we'll see if doctrine match up with what the translation say.

PICJAG.

 

[Truther]

that's true, let stick with what he knows best, ok. and we'll see if doctrine match up with what the translation say.

PICJAG.

The KJV is clearly correct on who God is.
The KJV does not say God has a human nature.
Thank God for the KJV.

 

[reformed1689]

Heretics abound here.

 

[101G]

Heretics abound here.

vain words, well it getting late, got to get up in the morning Lord willing.

so good night.

PICJAG.

 

[Truther]

Heretics abound here.

Labeling admits defeat by default

 

[reformed1689]

Labeling admits defeat by default

No it doesn't actually.

 

[prism]

You have assumed that two of the MOST CORRUPT manuscripts are the best and therefore additions have been made. But the opposite is true. There have been deliberate omissions in the corrupt manuscripts not once but hundreds of times.

Christians should know that the so-called scholars and critics have been promoting A HOAX since the 19th century. They have deliberately cast the most corrupt manuscripts as the best, and the best as the worst. So people should educate themselves by reading the extensive works of Burgon and Scrivener (as well as several others).

Those who hold to the explanation of scribal zeal will lean towards counting additional text as something that needs to be removed.
Those who hold to conspiratorial scribes will lean towards counting omitted text as something that had been tampered with.

 

[Truther]

No it doesn't actually.

I disagree. I never label folks. I used to when I could not defend my ideas at a time in my life. Now I see less knowledgeable friends do it, and I point out this is their defense mechanism kicking in.
Folks shout “heretic” at each other when baffled theologically.
Catholics are proficient at that especially.

 

[reformed1689]

Folks shout “heretic” at each other when baffled theologically.

No, people shout heretic when the other person engages in heresy.

 

[prism]

God does not lower himself to humans, nor does God have a human nature.

Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
(Php 2:5-8)

 

[Truther]

No, people shout heretic when the other person engages in heresy.

No, shouting “heretic” at someone is for Catholic persecutors at Protestant trials

 

[Truther]

Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
(Php 2:5-8)

God thought it not robbery to be equal with God etc?

 

[Enoch111]

Those who hold to the explanation of scribal zeal will lean towards counting additional text as something that needs to be removed.
Those who hold to conspiratorial scribes will lean towards counting omitted text as something that had been tampered with.

Well you can't sit on the fence in this matter. And there is no conspiracy *theory*. The evidence is there for all to see. Please do a careful comparison between the Textus Receptus and the Critical Text (W & H, Nestle, Nestle-Aland, whatever). When there are thousands of changes and hundred of changes affecting doctrine, you must sit up and take notice.

 

[reformed1689]

Well you can't sit on the fence in this matter. And there is no conspiracy *theory*. The evidence is there for all to see. Please do a careful comparison between the Textus Receptus and the Critical Text (W & H, Nestle, Nestle-Aland, whatever). When there are thousands of changes and hundred of changes affecting doctrine, you must sit up and take notice.

Name one that ACTUALLY impacts doctrine.

 

[ReChoired]

Name one that ACTUALLY impacts doctrine.

I did already. Hebrews 9:12 KJB vs NKJV.

 

[reformed1689]

I did already. Hebrews 9:12 KJB vs NKJV.

And how is the doctrine ACTUALLY impacted?

 

[reformed1689]

Just take a look at Hebrews 9:12 in the KJB and the NKJV (current edition, there are differing versions). The first is true, while the other false, and misrepresentative.

How so? They are virtually identical.