Webers_Home
Well-Known Member
.
Continued From No.1178
The "exact representation" spoken of by Heb 1:3 is neither a reflection nor a
photograph, nor a petro glyph, nor a stone monument. The Greek word
pertains to copies and duplicates; which in the Son's case, is a sentient
being rather than an inanimate object.
• Col 2:9 . . It is in him that all the fullness of the divine quality dwells
bodily.
The Greek word for "divine quality" is theóteetos which means: divinity
Seeing as how theóteetos is modified by the Greek definite article "teés"
then what we're looking at here in Col 2:9 isn't nondescript divinity, rather
the divinity. In other words: we're looking at all the fullness of Jehovah's
divinity.
The Son then, is a living replica of his Father, i.e. were the two stood side
by side, so to speak, you would not be able to tell which was which because
they are so identical.
_
Continued From No.1178
Everyone knows what an image is. Not the real thing. If you shoot the image in the
mirror, you do away with the image, not the real thing.
The "exact representation" spoken of by Heb 1:3 is neither a reflection nor a
photograph, nor a petro glyph, nor a stone monument. The Greek word
pertains to copies and duplicates; which in the Son's case, is a sentient
being rather than an inanimate object.
• Col 2:9 . . It is in him that all the fullness of the divine quality dwells
bodily.
The Greek word for "divine quality" is theóteetos which means: divinity
Seeing as how theóteetos is modified by the Greek definite article "teés"
then what we're looking at here in Col 2:9 isn't nondescript divinity, rather
the divinity. In other words: we're looking at all the fullness of Jehovah's
divinity.
The Son then, is a living replica of his Father, i.e. were the two stood side
by side, so to speak, you would not be able to tell which was which because
they are so identical.
_