There are no examples of a baby being baptized. But, there is also not one statement or example of a baby being excluded from baptism. We are told several times that if the head of the house believes, the whole household is saved. This is the same pattern in the Old Testament with circumcision.
if you look at this from a historical perspective as I have done, you will find that it was common practice that whatever religion the head of the house followed, all the other members of the house followed it as well, even the slaves.
In Acts 16 Lydia and ALL her household were baptised. We do not know if she was married, had children or servants but when it says all her household it suggests that there were others, which might include babies/children so I do not think we can rule out infant baptism or make a case for it specifically.
Another point to consider in history, and this applies to pagan religion as well, you were not considered committed to the cause until you had been baptised by immersion as it was your way of saying that you have adopted what it involves being a member of that religion.
Just saying that you want to be a member of whatever did not carry any weight or even signing the pledge or the christian form, the decision card.
"All" in here does not mean your "future" sins, and sins that you don't confess and purposely withheld are NOT forgiven.
I never said anything about future sins. You don't need to be forgiven for sins that you haven't committed with the proviso that all sin was dealt with at the cross once and for all so we are all under the blood of calvary which washes away our sin.
What I referred to was that when we confess our sin, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sin and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness (to that moment in time).
The fact is, he either does or does not cleanse us from all unrighteousness and this verse says he does with the confession of any sin. It does not say or imply that we cannot be cleansed of sin until we have confessed every one of them which is logical as there may be some things done that we do not realise are sin bearing in mind he judges us according to his standards, not ours.
St. John says "IF (and that's a big IF), we confess our sins, we will be forgiven of all unrighteousness. St. John never said, if we don't confess our sins....that's okay....it's forgiven anyway. If our sins were already cleansed, St. John would not tell us to confess our sins in order for us to be cleansed.
I can't help feeling there is quite a bit of twisting and turning and convoluted thinking here.
There is no indication that John is saying that our sins are already cleansed...automatically so that comment is irrelevant.
Plus no one has said if we don't confess sin that it is OK we are forgiven anyway so that comment is irrelevant.
What has been said is that for any forgiveness to be effective we have to confess our SINS which in the Greek is offence or sinfulness so it could be one sin or several.
To understand what I am saying is true, let's look at the Greek which says....If, and you may or may not, acknowledge your sins, he is trustworthy and equitable to send forth your sins, and to cleanse us from all, any, every whole moral wrongfulness of character, both life and act. 1 John 1:9
I do not think you can get anything more definite than that.