Where? Do you believe in the existence of the God who has the character traits that the Law of Moses was given in order to teach us how to embody?but that the New Testament distinguishes between God’s eternal righteousness and the Mosaic covenant as the governing covenant for His people.
While it is true that the New Covenant is not like the covenant that God made with their fathers, the New Covenant involves God putting the Torah in our minds and writing it on our hearts (Hebrews 8:10), so the difference is not in regard to following the Torah, and the fact that the Mosaic Covenant has become obsolete does not means that followers of Christ should not continue to follow his example of obedience to the Torah. In Exodus 20:6 God wanted His children to love Him and obey His commandments, so obedience to the Torah has always been a matter of the heart. Christ spent his ministry teaching his followers to obey the Torah by word and by example and the reason why he established the New Covenant was not in order to nullify anything that he spent his ministry teaching or so that we could continue to have the same lawlessness that caused the New Covenant to be needed in the first place, but rather the New Covenant still involves following the Torah (Jeremiah 31:3).Jeremiah 31:32
If the way to embody God's righteousness could change, then God's righteousness and righteous laws would not be eternal. So Hebrews 7:12 could not be referring to a change of the law in regard to its content, such as with it becoming righteous to commit adultery or sinful to do charity, but rather the context is speaking about a change of the priesthood, which would required a change of the law in regard to its administration. A priesthood led by God's Word made flesh does not involve departing from God's Word.Hebrews 7:12.
Everything in the Torah is either in regard to how to love God or our neighbor, which is why love fulfills it and why Jesus said in Matthew 22:36-40 that those are the greatest two commandments and that all of the other commandments hang on them. So the position that we should obey the greatest two commandments is also the position the we should obey the rest of the commandments that hang on them. For example, if someone thought that they only needed to love God and their neighbor, so they did not need to refrain from committing murder or kidnapping, then they would have an incomplete understanding of what it means to love God and their neighbor, and the same is true about everything else in the Torah. Someone who was correctly obeying the greatest two commandments would be indistinguishable from someone who was correctly obeying the rest of the Torah because they would both be following the same example that Jesus set for us to follow.because love is the righteousness the law was aiming at,
In Romans 7:22-23, Paul said that he delighted in obeying the Law of God in contrast with the of sin, which was waging war with the law of his mind and held him captive, so please making the case for why being released from a law that held us captive should be interpreted as referring to being released from what Paul delighted in doing rather than being released from the law that he described as holding him captive. Wouldn't it make a whole lot more sense for Paul to want to be released from the law that was hindering him from doing the good that he wanted to do and delighted in doing so that he could be free to do that rather than him wanting to be released from what he delighted in doing so that he could be free to be held captive to sin?In Romans 7:6
You have given no justification for insisting that Paul was referring to the Law of Moses. The Law of Moses is not sinful, but how we know what sin is (Romans 7:7), whereas the law of sin stirs up sinful passions in order to bear fruit unto death (Romans 7:5), so it is sinful. It is by the Law of Moses that we have knowledge of what sin is (Romans 3:20), so the position that we have been released from it is the position that Christians have been freed to become doers of what it reveals to be sin whereas the position that we are not free to sin is the position that we have not been released from the Law of Moses. Serving in the new way of the Spirit is in accordance with what God has instructed, not contrary to it. In Romans 8:3-4, we have been set free from sin in order to be free to meet the righteous requirement of the Law of God, not the other way around. The Spirit produces the righteousness that the Law of God requires us by leading us to obey it. I'm speaking about obeying the Mosaic Law under the New Covenant, not going back to the Mosaic Covenant.not under law but under grace.
Please interact with what I said in regard to Acts 15 in this post:Acts 15
Christians are in Rebellion against God for not following Torah
(As I said on another thread, this to most of us is common sense and basic Biblical literacy, I let Grok take care of most of the work, unlike my favorite projects where Grok is my editor and I brainstorm and write most everything except the last editing fixes). Acts 15 context and the core...
The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, has the character traits that the Law of Moses was given in order to teach us how to embody, which is why Deuteronomy 13 associates false prophets who speak against obeying the Law of Moses with those who teach to follow other gods. To follow different set of laws for how to embody a different set of character traits is to follow a different god with a different set of character traits than that of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. For example, if someone refuses to follow God's instructions for how to be holy as He is holy, then they are following a god who is not holy. So if your interpretation of Acts 15 were correct that the Apostles were speaking against obeying the Law of Moses, then that would mean that they were false prophets, which is why I am strongly opposed to it. The position that we should uphold the Torah through faith is the opposite of the position that we have been released from it.You also appealed to Deuteronomy 13.
The reason why the Law of Moses leads us to Christ is not so that we can then reject everything that he taught and go back to being doers of what it reveals to be wickedness.A tutor is not rejected as useless; rather, its temporary role has reached its goal.
Everything that 2 Timothy 3:16-17 says that the OT is profitable for is in regard to our conduct. The reason why we should learn from the Bible is to learn what we should do.2 Timothy 3:16
We can't follow Jesus instead of following his example of walking in obedience to the Law of Moses. We can't walk in the Spirit instead of following God's instructions in the Law of Moses for how to walk in the Spirit. We can't love God and our neighbor instead of following God's instructions in the Law of Moses to love God and our neighbor. We can't pursuing holiness instead of pursuing God's instructions in the Law of Moses for how to be holy as He is holy. We can't obey the teaching of Christ and his Apostles instead of following the Law of Moses that they taught. The Bible consistently refers to lawlessness in contrast with obeying the Law of Moses, so if it does not involve obeying it, then it is lawlessness. Our faith upholds the Law of Moses (Romans 3:31), so we can't have the obedience of faith instead of obeying the Law of Moses. Nowhere have I suggest that we should go back to the Mosaic Covenant and nowhere does the Bible state that Jesus fulfilled the Mosaic Covenant or even state that it is something that can be fulfilled.We follow Jesus by walking in the Spirit

