Communion vs Holy Communion

[Stranger]

Nope. Wrong again.

I haven't isolated anything.

Read this AGAIN: There were bad men ON BOTH SIDES. Is that "isolating the confederates actions"??

Hint: The answer is NO.

Fair enough. You didn't dismiss his actions. The reason you pointed out the bad actions of others was to ____________. (fill in the blank)

So let's get back on track. Are you going to continue to be prejudiced to the eyewitness account of a man who lied in his own memoirs and told his story 50 years later? Or are you going to look at both eyewitness accounts???

Are you even going to acknowledge that your "original source" statement was a bit misguided since there was more than one original source that wrote their account 50 years earlier than yours?

Historical Mary

Yes, you want the event of Lawrence isolated from what went before that.

I pointed out the actions of others because they were the reason for the Lawrence raid.

You haven't proved that McCorkle lied.

How was my comment of 'original source' misguided. It is an original source. The Fifty years is really immaterial other than the fact that it wont be clouded with bias and prejudice of the day.

Stranger

 

[Marymog]

Yes, you want the event of Lawrence isolated from what went before that.

I pointed out the actions of others because they were the reason for the Lawrence raid.

You haven't proved that McCorkle lied.

How was my comment of 'original source' misguided. It is an original source. The Fifty years is really immaterial other than the fact that it wont be clouded with bias and prejudice of the day.

Stranger

We should take this to the forum you started. This isn’t the appropriate forum.

Mary