It's a difficult judgement where the angels protect us from dashing our foot against a stone vs jumping over it and of a cliff expecting salvation. Psalm 91 is the psalm used now to prove God protects us. What I see in common though is the person is being protected against surrounding circumstances they have no control over as opposed to deliberately diving into danger. That said, I do not believe the Lord would have us do things like giving a holy kiss, laying on of hands (especially for the sick) if it was dangerous or forbidden, and obeying a command is not placing one in deliberate danger. So the church to be an effective witness should be healing people as that's what Jesus would be doing in this pandemic. At the expense of sounding a tad cruel, I can't help but to think there's some sort of spiritual disconnect in a congregation that comes down sick as easily as if they were out celebrating in a bar. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying a Christian may not become sick as maybe there are other reasons for that individual. However, when the whole congregation becomes a major spreader in the community, they have not benefited the cause of Christ any. At the very least, if they are not healing people, most should stay well instead of infecting the whole congregation and then spreading it outside yet to boot. So when these unconstitutional restrictions go into place by the aspiring beast system to come, the church should continue getting together to demonstrate the power of God -- only those who show sick symptoms should stay home as maybe there's a personal issue there(for the elders to lay hands on) But the world does not understand that's why we have to get out from under our bushels and add salt to our testimony to show there's a healing God.
You're saying visit church? Our Church does hold meetings, so I'm not against that unless you're a high risk individual of death from COVID-19. Then online meetings until the vaccine is available seems appropriate. Cheers.