aspen
“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
One needs to take a great deal of what you quote out of context to find truth. BTW we again see you quoting someone elses work?
Whats with that?
Do you believe the flesh is good? How can something whcih dies be good? God is a God of the living not the dead...the Spirit is good yes, but what of the flesh?
Do you have your own understanding or shall we read wiki again?
For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but [how] to perform that which is good I find not. Rom 7:18 and Jesus Mark 10:18
What was Paul speaking about Aspen?
Here is some information you might be able to use........students quote scholars - they do not simply pull ideas out of thin air. BTW I use The Ethereal Library for most of the information I gather online about the Church Fathers and Christian Mysticism.
As far as the flesh being good - we were created good - that includes the flesh and the spirit. Actually, Jewish people and the Early Church didn't even distinguish between the body and spirit. Then, through our own sinful actions we were cursed - we were subjected to spiritual death, which also manifested in physical death. It has been pointed out to you many times that you are confusing Paul's use of the word flesh (being ruled by our lower passions) with the body - yet you continue to deny this fact, which has been part of the Christian narrative since PAUL.
The fact that you rely on your own understanding of the Bible is not a virtue! It is considered foolish and arrogant, by theologians and academics, alike. Dismissing over 2,000 years of study is so bombastic and reckless, it makes me dizzy!
In addition, the very fact that you continue to deny the true nature of God places you outside Christianity. Once again, all heresies and Christian cults begin by distorting the true nature of God as Triune.
So please spend some time thinking about where you have gone astray - pray for wisdom and understanding and consider reading some church history, opening a commentary or taking a class in Christian theology.
I certainly do not claim to be an expert in theology, but the issues you raise are so basic, seriously! Determining the role of sanctification in salvation is an example of a contentious issue amongst Christian theologians; considering whether or not baptism is symbolic or a necessary part of justification is paramount in making an informed decision concerning church membership and framing our relationship with God; both issues are legitimate. Arguing over the word 'flesh', as if you alone have made the discovery of a lifetime is quaint and amusing at best, and heretical at worse; especially when it ends in the erosion of Christ's deity.
I am not a person who looks down on people who are self-taught, but clearly you are dangerous and should be viewed only as a cautionary tale of someone too absorbed in his own understanding of the Bible to allow the light of truth to enter his mind and heart! Let alone the fact that you are trying to teach....Lord have mercy on us all!