I like what
@BarneyFife wrote earlier.
I am not familiar with this terminology.....my interest is in what Jesus said and how his Jewish audience understood him from their perspective. We can sometimes forget that Jesus wasn’t a “Christian”...he was a Jew and born under law.... a law that was to give way to the teachings of a new covenant, the terms of which were very different and implemented only after Jesus had paid for the redemption of the human race with his own life. Jeremiah had prophesied about this new covenant so the Jews had no excuse to reject its mediator. The Jewish religion had been hijacked centuries before Jesus came by corrupt men who turned the scriptures into something that glorified themselves and disobeyed the God who gave them those scriptures, largely about their shortcomings.
Seems we both take the approach that fits our presuppositions.
We can take whatever approach suits our suppositions, but it doesn’t make them right....
Like any belief that we take on board, the heart is involved and sometimes it can’t be trusted.
Jeremiah wrote.....Jer 17:9-10...
“The heart is more treacherous* than anything else and is desperate.
Who can know it?
10 I, Jehovah, am searching the heart,
Examining the innermost thoughts,
To give to each one according to his ways,
According to the fruitage of his works.”
So our motives are made evident by God searching the heart, and “examining” our “innermost thoughts”......and then giving us his his acceptance or rejection, based on what we do with what we know....
There is a difference between what we know....and what we think we know......this is why we need to make a careful examination of the scriptures for ourselves, not just accepting man made doctrines as if they should never be questioned.....my policy is “question everything”. Examine every teaching to see if it is cracked up by the whole Bible, not just some misinterpreted and misapplied verses.
Your rebuttal is loaded with assumptions.
Since the scriptures are not specific in certain areas, that doesn’t mean we can’t use what IS in the scriptures to make some of those assumptions. Since all the original disciples of Jesus were Jewish, we can see how Christ’s teachings may have been difficult to implement, especially in Jewish households with more than one wife, but as time went on and the hearts of many saw the need to make that adjustment in a long standing practice, we get a clearer picture of what must have been for some, a dilemma.
Since men had to pay a dowry for an intended wife, that in itself may have meant that those who had little means did not have more than one wife. And since wealth was something that acted as a hinderance in a Christian’s life, we can assume that not many who were wealthy responded to the Christian ethic of sharing their wealth with their poorer brothers and sisters.
When a rich man asked Jesus how to obtain everlasting life, he told him to keep God’s commandments, so when the man said that he already did that.....
“21 Jesus said to him: “If you want to be perfect, go sell your belongings and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come be my follower.” 22 When the young man heard this, he went away grieved, for he had many possessions. 23 Then Jesus said to his disciples: “Truly I say to you that it will be difficult for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of the heavens. 24 Again I say to you, it is easier for a camel to get through a needle’s eye than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God.”
So we can deduce certain things by reading through the scriptures for clues.