Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Eric E Stahl said:They didn't survive the flood but some were born after the flood.
Arnie Manitoba said:There are marine fossils on the top of mount Everest and they match marine fossils on the beaches of Baja California
Where did you come up with the notion nephlim were cannibals ??
Where did you come up with the notion nephlim were demon - men ??
Here is an excerpt from Christianity Board Statement of Faith.Pelaides said:The book of enoch.
There is no Enoch in the biblical canon recognized by this website. So, if you want to make an argument by citing Scriptures, then you would do well to stick to books in the above-stated biblical canon.We believe the Bible (composed of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, I Samuel, II Samuel, 1 Kings, II Kings, I Chronicles, II Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts, Romans, I Corinthians, II Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, I Thessalonians, II Thessalonians, I Timothy, II Timothy, Titus, Philemon, Hebrews, James, I Peter, II Peter, I John, II John, III John, Jude and Revelation) is the inspired and infallible Word of God to all men and women.
There's a high probability you're right. At one time, the four rivers depictedArnie Manitoba said:the mountains could very well have been raised up after the flood etc
See post #14Dodo_David said:in order for a person to be born after the Genesis flood, the person must have ancestors
who survived the flood.
Yet fallen angels would have survived the flood because they are spiritual beings. The daughters of men also would have survived the flood as evidenced by your being alive. So what is to keep the Nephilim from being born even today?Dodo_David said:Dude, in order for a person to be born after the Genesis flood, the person must have ancestors who survived the flood.
So your statement is non sequitur.
Indeed they were - note:Eric E Stahl said:Genises 6:4
4There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
They didn't survive the flood but some were born after the flood.
This is it! a nephlim only without the red hair.notice the shape of the skull,it is cone shaped,like the ones found in south america.
The church of ethiopia,acknowledges The book of enoch.Dude, in order for a person to be born after the Genesis flood, the person must have ancestors who survived the flood.
So your statement is non sequitur.
Here is an excerpt from Christianity Board Statement of Faith.
There is no Enoch in the biblical canon recognized by this website. So, if you want to make an argument by citing Scriptures, then you would do well to stick to books in the above-stated biblical canon.
Hey dodo ... before you go and make a fool of yourself you should first read what I postedDodo_David said:There is no Enoch in the biblical canon recognized by this website. So, if you want to make an argument by citing Scriptures, then you would do well to stick to books in the above-stated biblical canon.
laid renard said:I don't believe these creatures exist. If they did, surely their remains would have been found by now. :)
I agree with you on this one HS - there should not be any reason for any dramatic physical changes between one group of humans mingling with another.I've tried to read "sons of God" as non-heavenly, but the term itself is employed in other instances that do describe angelic beings. I'm just not convinced that the Bible would go out of its way to emphasize these particular characteristics if this were one group of humans mingling with another.
The angels that fornicated with women were assigned to watch the inhabitants of earth,they seeing the beauty of our women,came down and defiled themselves with them.These angels were not part of the uprising associated with lucifer.God is perfect,unfortunately his angels are not.Webers_Home said:.
Besides sons of God and sons of men, there are also sons of Belial and sons
of the prophets.
Apparently "belial" isn't a proper name, but simply means good for nothing;
viz: "sons of Belial" is a colloquialism for riffraff. For example: bums, loafers,
thugs, punks, delinquents, trouble-makers, protesters, rabble, scofflaws, the
scum of the earth, cheap goods, low hack, churls, et al.
"sons of the prophets" would refer to seminary students.
From what I've seen, a son of something or other in the Bible is ambiguous;
even arbitrary. But if we're going to call angels "sons of God" then we're
going to have to limit that category to angels that follow God as opposed to
angels that follow the Devil because angels that follow God don't go around
sleeping with women. It insults and denigrates God to insinuate that His
angels are unholy because heaven's angels are clean spirits rather than
unclean.
There's an interesting assembly of the sons of God depicted at Job 1:6
wherein Satan was among them; which serves to remind me that when I go
to church, Satan's sons are in church the same as God's sons. Jesus once said
that where two or three are gathered together in his name; there is he in the
midst. Well; guess who else is there along with the two or three? You would
think that church is hallow ground; and it is; but not that hallow.
Buen Camino
/
Non-material beings producing children with material beings? I don't thinkPelaides said:The angels that fornicated with women