Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Goodness todays rebellious youth would love this my friend .Jesus knew that Judas would betray him. This begs the question, did Judas ever have a choice?
Back in the 1800's a farmer in Kentucky was plowing his field. Preparing the soil to plant corn.1 Corinthians chapter 14 covers that. Two or three prophets can speak.
Here's a testimony of what happened to me once.
I was on another forum years ago where a man was having a rant which ended in an absolute fit by writing this:
"... consult with your Holy Spirit and get back to me!"
Yikes! It was a real scorcher of a post. Had to wear oven mitts to read it. - LOL
I was still reeling when I heard very clearly, "Answer him."
Say what? "Er... what should I say?"
No reply, as usual. - LOL
I hit REPLY and took a deep breath and just started typing.
Words were going into the post with little thinking effort from me.
I reviewed what I had written and fixed the obvious spelling errors.
Marveling at what I had written, but a bit uncomfortable. I hit SEND.
I had asked him to flip open a Bible and point randomly to a verse that would speak to him.
Under normal circumstances I don't recommend doing that. But... whatever. ???
The next day I heard back from the guy. He was a completely different person.
Something had changed. He told me that he had in fact randomly opened the Bible and pointed to a verse.
The verse is pasted below.
When he read "before the silver cord is severed" he was overcome with God's presence.
The post I had delivered spoke to the pain he was experiencing. Which I had no knowledge of.
He shared that he had lost a child and his wife in childbirth. He was angry and bitter.
The "silver cord" had reminded him of the umbilical cord "severed" at birth.
He pressed me to tell him the color of his wife's hair.
I said that would be an abuse of the gift, but for some reason I was seeing red hair in my mind's eye.
BINGO. Red hair.
Ecclesiastes 12:6 NIV
Remember him—before the silver cord is severed,
and the golden bowl is broken;
before the pitcher is shattered at the spring,
and the wheel broken at the well,
That objection only works if you force the text to say more than it says.If the priests bought the field then Acts is wrong in saying that Judas bought the field. It can only be one or the other.
But as I said there are many contradictions in the bible. Here is a list of 50 of them. At some point one must admit that the author got it wrong.
50 Contradictions in the Bible: The Biggest, Most Shocking Differences
There are no contradictions in the Bible. There are contradictions in the darkened understanding of men who handle Scripture like prosecutors instead of hearers before God.But as I said there are many contradictions in the bible. Here is a list of 50 of them. At some point one must admit that the author got it wrong.
50 Contradictions in the Bible: The Biggest, Most Shocking Differences
There are no contradictions in the Bible. There are contradictions in the darkened understanding of men who handle Scripture like prosecutors instead of hearers before God.
@amigo de christoGoodness todays rebellious youth would love this my friend .
But daddy when you told me to take out the trash and i didnt not obey you
It was because i had NO choice but to not obey you .
People . WE DO have a choice . ITS CALLED CHOOSE YE THIS DAY whom ye SHALL obey .
As for me and the sheep ITS THE CHRIST OF GOD , SON of GOD .
And by His Spirit He does g uide and unction and led us .

What dog breed is it? Thanks
We were discussing one a while back on the forum.Just to add that what most people think of as contradictions are really just apparent contradictions, meaning there is a plausible resolution to be found upon closer inspection. There isn't an apparent contradiction that hasn't been brought up that someone else hasn't addressed in the past two thousand years.
its the breed nonstoppa energy . better known as a jack russell .What dog breed is it? Thanks
And now for a real simple question and then a real simple answer .That objection only works if you force the text to say more than it says.
Matthew tells us who handled the purchase: “the chief priests took the silver pieces… and bought with them the potter’s field” ~Matthew 27:6-7.
Acts tells us whose money purchased it and whose wicked act led to it: Judas “purchased a field with the reward of iniquity” ~Acts 1:18.
That is not a contradiction. It is ordinary speech. If a man’s money is used to buy property because of his action, Scripture can speak of that field as connected to him. The priests physically bought it. Judas’s blood money funded it. Both statements are true.
The same thing happens in normal language. A man may say, “I built a house,” even though contractors did the physical work. Why? Because it was built by his funds, under his action, and for his purpose. No honest reader calls that a contradiction.
The bigger issue is this: you are not dealing with the passages in context. You are grabbing a list called “50 contradictions” and assuming the Bible is guilty before the text is even examined. That is not careful reasoning. That is importing unbelief into the discussion.
Scripture says, “The sum of thy word is truth” ~Psalm 119:160. Jesus said, “the scripture cannot be broken” ~John 10:35. So when two passages give different details, the right question is not, “How can I make these fight?” The right question is, “What exactly does each passage say?”
Matthew gives the priests’ action. Acts gives Judas’s responsibility and the source of the money. There is no contradiction unless someone is determined to create one.
In other words , SINCE they cant prove those who hold to the TRUTH in scripture wrong .There are no contradictions in the Bible. There are contradictions in the darkened understanding of men who handle Scripture like prosecutors instead of hearers before God.
Jesus said, “the scripture cannot be broken” ~John 10:35. That settles the issue for anyone who claims to follow Christ. He did not say Scripture is mostly reliable, mostly true, or true until a skeptic gathers fifty objections from the internet. He said it cannot be broken.
So when someone says, “At some point one must admit the author got it wrong,” the real issue is not evidence. The real issue is authority. You are asking us to put man in the judge’s seat and place God’s Word in the dock. Scripture does not bow to the unbelieving mind. The unbelieving mind must bow to Scripture.
Jesus prayed, “Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth” ~John 17:17. Truth does not become error because men do not understand it. The Bible does not become contradictory because a reader refuses context, ignores genre, confuses different details, or demands that every account be worded the exact same way.
A list titled “50 Contradictions” proves nothing. It is accusation by volume. One bad argument does not become strong because someone stacked forty-nine more beside it. Each claim has to be brought to the text, read in context, and tested by the whole counsel of God’s Word. “The sum of thy word is truth” ~Psalm 119:160. Scripture is not corrected by skeptical lists. Scripture interprets Scripture.
And the Bible already explains why the natural man stumbles over the Word of God. “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned” ~1 Corinthians 2:14. That is not name-calling. That is God’s diagnosis. A man can have education, confidence, and a long list of objections, and still be blind to the truth sitting right in front of him.
Paul says, “But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not” ~2 Corinthians 4:3-4. Blind men do not correct the light. They need their eyes opened.
So no, I will not admit that God got it wrong because a skeptic says so. “Let God be true, but every man a liar” ~Romans 3:4. The problem is not that Scripture contradicts itself. The problem is that man’s proud heart contradicts Scripture and then calls that scholarship.
Bring one alleged contradiction at a time. Put it on the table. Let the text speak. But do not throw a pile of accusations at the Bible and call that proof. That is not reasoning. That is unbelief hiding behind a numbered list.
there are many bible haters my friend . But do beware for they will come in as thoughThat objection only works if you force the text to say more than it says.
Matthew tells us who handled the purchase: “the chief priests took the silver pieces… and bought with them the potter’s field” ~Matthew 27:6-7.
Acts tells us whose money purchased it and whose wicked act led to it: Judas “purchased a field with the reward of iniquity” ~Acts 1:18.
That is not a contradiction. It is ordinary speech. If a man’s money is used to buy property because of his action, Scripture can speak of that field as connected to him. The priests physically bought it. Judas’s blood money funded it. Both statements are true.
The same thing happens in normal language. A man may say, “I built a house,” even though contractors did the physical work. Why? Because it was built by his funds, under his action, and for his purpose. No honest reader calls that a contradiction.
The bigger issue is this: you are not dealing with the passages in context. You are grabbing a list called “50 contradictions” and assuming the Bible is guilty before the text is even examined. That is not careful reasoning. That is importing unbelief into the discussion.
Scripture says, “The sum of thy word is truth” ~Psalm 119:160. Jesus said, “the scripture cannot be broken” ~John 10:35. So when two passages give different details, the right question is not, “How can I make these fight?” The right question is, “What exactly does each passage say?”
Matthew gives the priests’ action. Acts gives Judas’s responsibility and the source of the money. There is no contradiction unless someone is determined to create one.
It is GOD who draws us to CHRIST . yes my friend .Those who deny free will, do they feel like robots, with no responsibility for their decisions and actions?
We must believe in free will so as to motivate ourselves to crucify the lusts of the flesh and renew our minds.
The message of Jesus is “Repent and believe the gospel”, so it must be possible for the most sinful, depraved person to obey this command.
But it seems true that God does something inside us, seeds planted over time, so we can be receptive to the gospel. Still, we must decide. If we had no choice, there could be no sin or judgment. We must understand this to grow in spiritual maturity. But we do not feel proud of our righteous decisions, we remain humble.
Joshua 24
14 Now therefore fear the Lord, and serve him in sincerity and in truth: and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood, and in Egypt; and serve ye the Lord.
15 And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.
Do you not believe that we are predestined?Those who deny free will, do they feel like robots, with no responsibility for their decisions and actions?
If so, they can never be convicted of personal sin. They assume every thought and deed of theirs was predestined, so they are not at fault.
We must believe in free will so as to motivate ourselves to crucify the lusts of the flesh and renew our minds.
The message of Jesus is “Repent and believe the gospel”, so it must be possible for the most sinful, depraved person to obey this command.
That objection only works if you force the text to say more than it says.
Gee! I think you just defined and explained just about every liberal mayor, governor, in every blue state and city in this here U.S. of A., as well about every democrat! WELL DONE SIR!No one who doesn't believe in free will actually lives their life as if it were true. If some random person came up to them and punched in the nose, they wouldn't just shrug it off as if it was beyond that person's control. In fact, society couldn't function at all if there was no free will because nobody would be accountable for their actions.
Cashless Bail? Gun Control? Sounds pretty "lawless" doesn't it? This is very true! EXCEPT when it comes to those who are "Chosen" BY the Father and GOD of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. For "times" such as these! And, yea, even "times" before these, and yea, even "times" after these!In terms of salvation, it makes even less sense to me. If some are predestined to be saved, then there would be no reason for Jesus to die for the sins of all humanity.
No!.....It doesn't AT ALL negate the purpose of the Great Commission!It also negates the whole purpose of the Great Commission to spread the gospel if it's not really our choice.
@Titus @amigo de christoits the breed nonstoppa energy . better known as a jack russell .