ELECTION FRAUD: Connecting the Dots
- Thread starter Prayer Warrior
- Start date
-
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
WaterSong
Well-Known Member
Joey, you foolish crook! You're choosing the chairman of Smartmatic's! A company involved in the theft of this election and for your transition team? Talk about arrogant and ridiculously stupid!
Certain he's going to sit in the White House and get away with the stealing the election, Joey appoints the chairman of one of the companies that helped Joe steal the election.
He's certainly proving he walks his talk. He rewards those who help him when he seeks office.
Joe is a Catholic. Maybe he lives with himself as a crook and enemy of America because he thinks after he goes to confession and receives his penance and then absolution he's clean again. And assured heaven. Plus he thinks he'll receive a mansion and walk gold pathways once in heaven. He's smug in thinking the afterlife will reward him with a lifestyle his crooked politics let him to become accustomed to while here on earth.
I wonder if Joe might consider he'll hear God say one day, I never knew you.
WaterSong
Well-Known Member
More good news. :) Does it make anyone else sick to see their state in that scrolling list?
Do you think we'll ever hear the voting machines themselves have been taken into custody and for examination?
WaterSong
Well-Known Member
I watched this again. I should have saved the news article that reported at one polling site, I believe it was in PA, a woman was captured on tape filling out her ballot for something like 30 minutes. One ballot? Not likely.
The information in this video reminds me of this quote.
“Indeed, you won the elections, but I won the count.” Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza (1896-1956), per The Guardian (London), 17 June 1977.
I'm glad people won't be able to buy stock in Chinese companies that support the CCCP. However, being CCCP is communist wouldn't that refer to all Chinese companies?
I'd like to see an EO or law passed that exposes all Chinese shell companies operating in America. And afterward, those shells then lose all assets and operations.
We'd probably fall off our chairs if we knew how many of our mortgages are funded by the monies derived from China.
WaterSong
Well-Known Member
I'm so glad you posted this! :) The Electoral Count act. Bravo!
Bobby Jo
Well-Known Member
QUOTE: Prayer Warrior
From The Epoch Times
Georgia Governor Calls for Audit of Signatures on Ballot Envelopes
By Ivan Pentchoukov
November 20, 2020 Updated: November 21, 2020
...
“It seems simple enough to conduct a sample audit of signatures on the absentee ballot envelopes and compare those to the signatures on applications and on file at the secretary of state’s office.”...
Georgia Governor Calls for Audit of Signatures on Ballot Envelopes
By Ivan Pentchoukov
November 20, 2020 Updated: November 21, 2020
...
“It seems simple enough to conduct a sample audit of signatures on the absentee ballot envelopes and compare those to the signatures on applications and on file at the secretary of state’s office.”...
This ONLY tells us a percentage of Fraudulent Main-In-Ballots because the "Inner Envelope" with the SIGNATURE is placed in an ARCHIVE BOX, and the BALLOT continues by itself to the Tabulation Machine. So although it's possible to discover that some 30% of the Mail-In Ballots are Fraudulent, -- WHICH 30%?!? ALL counted for BIDEN; ALL counted for TRUMP; or a 50/50 split between the two candidates?!?
I suspect the "game" is to PRESUME that equal numbers of BIDEN and TRUMP votes are defective, which means that BIDEN STILL WINS, -- instead of the OBVIOUS circumstance where ALL the Fraudulent Ballots were created for BIDEN.
As such, it would appear that due to the MASSIVE DEMOCRATIC CRIMINALITY, the Presidential Election will have to go to Congress, and all other Offices and Initiatives will require a NEW ELECTION. -- Or so it would seem! :)
With BEST Regards,
Bobby Jo
Last edited:
I believe Trump's executive order applied to companies tied to the Chinese military.
Last edited:
Comparing signatures should reveal that there is fraud and how widespread it is, I would think.
WaterSong
Well-Known Member
Yes. However, the highest authority in the CCCP, Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, is that Central Committee. However, every five years the National Congress is convened. The membership in the Central Committee includes the military.
Imagine the time that will take.
BOMBSHELL IN GEORGIA! (johnfredericksradio.com)
<iframe width="702" height="395" src="
" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Listen at 6:17 as Lin Wood explains:
I believe that Brian Kemp is corrupt, and I think he was corrupted with Chinese money. And I don’t think he wants this election overthrown and the real results posted because then Brian Kemp is going to be facing a Trump administration Attorney General, and Brian Kemp would find himself in jail. It’s that simple. He sold himself out, now he’s trying to hide to try to get this election validated even though it’s illegal, because if it’s invalidated, Brian Kemp and a lot of other Georgia people are in trouble, including the Secretary of State.
Also, at the 17:00 mark:
I’m a defamation lawyer. I have stated publicly that Brian Kemp and Raffensperger are corrupt and they took money from the Chinese on the covid deal and on the Dominion voting deal. I bet you anything Brian Kemp won’t sue me for defamation. Because he knows if he did, he’d go into court, I’d have discovery, and I would prove that he did it, that it’s true.
<iframe width="702" height="395" src="
Listen at 6:17 as Lin Wood explains:
I believe that Brian Kemp is corrupt, and I think he was corrupted with Chinese money. And I don’t think he wants this election overthrown and the real results posted because then Brian Kemp is going to be facing a Trump administration Attorney General, and Brian Kemp would find himself in jail. It’s that simple. He sold himself out, now he’s trying to hide to try to get this election validated even though it’s illegal, because if it’s invalidated, Brian Kemp and a lot of other Georgia people are in trouble, including the Secretary of State.
Also, at the 17:00 mark:
I’m a defamation lawyer. I have stated publicly that Brian Kemp and Raffensperger are corrupt and they took money from the Chinese on the covid deal and on the Dominion voting deal. I bet you anything Brian Kemp won’t sue me for defamation. Because he knows if he did, he’d go into court, I’d have discovery, and I would prove that he did it, that it’s true.
Bobby Jo
Well-Known Member
... and the SAME for Dominion Voting Machines. They can't sue their accusers for the same exact reason, -- DISCOVERY --, and so all these criminals can do is find a bigger rock to hide under and hope the storm passes over with the FRAUDULENT Biden/Harris Administration.
Of course Hillary and criminals did the same thing thinking she would be elected, but TRUMP prevailed (albeit without the Prosecutions SO FAR!), and Trump will AGAIN PREVAIL but this time WITH the PROSECUTIONS. -- Or so I anticipate. ;)
With VERY Best Regards,
Bobby Jo
Last edited:
- Aug 10, 2012
- 6,098
- 7,489
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
Problem with Lin Wood's argument is it isn't easy for them to sue for defamation as public officials.
This is not the main point of what Woods talked about in the interview. It’s about the lawsuit he launched in Georgia concerning election fraud.
Good news! God is working to uncover the unfruitful deeds of darkness! Keep praying!
More election fraud to report on from The Epoch Times!
Thousands in Georgia Registered at Postal, Commercial Addresses, Portraying Them as Residences, Researcher Says
By Petr Svab
November 24, 2020 Updated: November 25, 2020
Print
Thousands of people registered and voted in Georgia using addresses of postal facilities or businesses, while making it look like they were residential addresses, according to a former Trump campaign official whose team analyzed the states’ voter data.
The addresses listed on the voter rolls included information that didn’t make sense for the actual locations, but on paper made the addresses look like residential ones, according to information published by Matt Braynard, former data and strategy director for President Donald Trump’s 2016 election campaign.
“Georgia: We have identified over a thousand early/abs votes cast by individuals whose registered addresses are in fact at post offices, UPS, and FedEx locations, wilfully disguising the box numbers as ‘Apt,’ ‘Unit,’ etc.,” he said in a Nov. 22 tweet.
He published a sample of 15 such address entries in a Nov. 24 tweet.
“With just a partial review of the state,” he said, the team also discovered “a thousand votes cast by those registered in non-residential, purely commercial addresses also disguised with ‘Apt.,’ etc.”
He added that these were “the residential addresses, not mailing addresses” that the voters have listed.
Nearly all those “who disguised a postal facility as their residential address” used an absentee ballot to vote, he said.
Georgia election law says that “the residence of any person shall be held to be in that place in which such person’s habitation is fixed, without any present intention of removing therefrom.”
Anyone who “knowingly gives false information when registering as an elector” can be charged with a felony and put in prison for up to 10 years or fined up to $100,000, the law says.
The office of Georgia Secretary of State didn’t immediately respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.
Trump trails his opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, by less than 13,000 votes in Georgia.
Other Findings
Braynard’s team also found some 1,400 voters in Pennsylvania who listed postal facility addresses as residential, he said.
Braynard previously reported that large percentages of registered Republicans in several battleground states said they returned their absentee ballots, even though the states’ data indicated they hadn’t.
Of the 1,137 Pennsylvania GOP voters reached by telephone who did request a ballot, nearly 42 percent said they mailed the ballots back, although state data shows the ballots weren’t received or counted, he said.
The office of the Pennsylvania Secretary of State didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
In Arizona, 50 percent of Republican voters reached over the phone had the same story, as well as 44 percent in Georgia, nearly 33 percent in Michigan, and 20 percent in Wisconsin.
In Pennsylvania, more than 160,000 uncounted mail-in ballots were requested by or in the name of registered Republicans.
Source: Thousands in Georgia Registered at Postal, Commercial Addresses, Portraying Them as Residences, Researcher Says
More election fraud to report on from The Epoch Times!
Thousands in Georgia Registered at Postal, Commercial Addresses, Portraying Them as Residences, Researcher Says
By Petr Svab
November 24, 2020 Updated: November 25, 2020
Thousands of people registered and voted in Georgia using addresses of postal facilities or businesses, while making it look like they were residential addresses, according to a former Trump campaign official whose team analyzed the states’ voter data.
The addresses listed on the voter rolls included information that didn’t make sense for the actual locations, but on paper made the addresses look like residential ones, according to information published by Matt Braynard, former data and strategy director for President Donald Trump’s 2016 election campaign.
“Georgia: We have identified over a thousand early/abs votes cast by individuals whose registered addresses are in fact at post offices, UPS, and FedEx locations, wilfully disguising the box numbers as ‘Apt,’ ‘Unit,’ etc.,” he said in a Nov. 22 tweet.
He published a sample of 15 such address entries in a Nov. 24 tweet.
“With just a partial review of the state,” he said, the team also discovered “a thousand votes cast by those registered in non-residential, purely commercial addresses also disguised with ‘Apt.,’ etc.”
He added that these were “the residential addresses, not mailing addresses” that the voters have listed.
Nearly all those “who disguised a postal facility as their residential address” used an absentee ballot to vote, he said.
Georgia election law says that “the residence of any person shall be held to be in that place in which such person’s habitation is fixed, without any present intention of removing therefrom.”
Anyone who “knowingly gives false information when registering as an elector” can be charged with a felony and put in prison for up to 10 years or fined up to $100,000, the law says.
The office of Georgia Secretary of State didn’t immediately respond to a request by The Epoch Times for comment.
Trump trails his opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden, by less than 13,000 votes in Georgia.
Other Findings
Braynard’s team also found some 1,400 voters in Pennsylvania who listed postal facility addresses as residential, he said.
Braynard previously reported that large percentages of registered Republicans in several battleground states said they returned their absentee ballots, even though the states’ data indicated they hadn’t.
Of the 1,137 Pennsylvania GOP voters reached by telephone who did request a ballot, nearly 42 percent said they mailed the ballots back, although state data shows the ballots weren’t received or counted, he said.
The office of the Pennsylvania Secretary of State didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
In Arizona, 50 percent of Republican voters reached over the phone had the same story, as well as 44 percent in Georgia, nearly 33 percent in Michigan, and 20 percent in Wisconsin.
In Pennsylvania, more than 160,000 uncounted mail-in ballots were requested by or in the name of registered Republicans.
Source: Thousands in Georgia Registered at Postal, Commercial Addresses, Portraying Them as Residences, Researcher Says
Last edited:
Attorney Challenging Georgia Election Outcome Appeals Case
By Janita Kan
November 24, 2020 Updated: November 24, 2020
Print
The attorney whose efforts to block the certification of Georgia’s 2020 election results was rejected by a federal judge has filed an appeal to the 11th Circuit Court seeking an emergency review of the lower court’s decision.
Lin Wood, an attorney with President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign, has escalated his efforts for an emergency request to prohibit the certification of the state’s election results or the tabulation of “defective absentee ballots.” He filed a notice informing the district court that he is appealing its decision to deny his emergency motion for relief to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
He said the request was made because the “Court erred in not granting the temporary restraining order for the unconstitutional, unlawful election,” according to a court filing (pdf). He also asked the court to consider the matter as a matter of urgency because presidential electors will meet on Dec. 14.
Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Steven Grimberg dismissed Wood’s efforts to delay the vote certification in the state, ruling that the attorney lacked legal standing as an individual voter to challenge Georgia’s election procedures.
Wood filed a lawsuit (pdf) against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and other state officials on Nov. 13, arguing that an agreement between election officials and the state’s Democratic Party that changed the process of handling absentee ballots in Georgia is unconstitutional.
Under the U.S. Constitution, only state legislatures and Congress can prescribe the “times, places, and manner of holding elections.”
He argues that the state officials were unauthorized to change the manner of processing absentee ballots in a way that was contrary with the state election code, and hence, the counting of absentee ballots for the general election in the state is, therefore, “improper and must not be permitted.”
“To allow otherwise would erode the sacred and basic rights of Georgia citizens under the United States Constitution to participate in and rely upon a free and fair election,” Wood wrote.
The March 2020 agreement between Raffensperger, the State Election Board, and various state Democratic entities changed the way absentee ballots are processed in a way that isn’t consistent with election laws passed by the Georgia Legislature.
According to the agreement, county officials are required to form a committee of three people if any one official believes an absentee ballot is defective because the voter’s signature on the ballot envelope doesn’t match the signature on file. If a majority in the committee determines that the signature doesn’t match, it can then “reject” the ballot.
“Under the Litigation Settlement, any determination of a signature mismatch would lead to the cumbersome process described in the settlement, which was not intended by the Georgia Legislature, which authorized those decisions to be made by single election officials,” Wood argues in the lawsuit.
“The Litigation Settlement by itself has created confusion, misplaced incentives, and undermined the confidence of the voters of the State of Georgia in the electoral system. Neither it nor any of the activities spawned by it were authorized by the Georgia Legislature, as required by the United States Constitution.”
In response to Grimberg’s ruling, Wood characterized the judge’s ruling on his request for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction as “unclear.”
“He may have overreached to dismiss my claim that [the] election was unlawful due to [Georgia Secretary of State] consent agreement,” Wood said in a statement on Twitter, referring to the March agreement.
“The recount issue was separate from unlawful election issue. Sounded like Court thinks a GA voter has NO standing to challenge unlawful federal election,” he wrote. “Lawyer for [Secretary of State] suggested only state [Attorney General] could do so. What? [Attorney General] represents [Secretary of State]. Makes no sense.”
On Monday, Wood served a subpoena on State Farm Arena, a ballot counting location in the state, seeking video footage filmed on the premises during and after Election Day.
The Trump campaign had requested a recount, which is expected to be completed by 11:59 p.m. on Dec. 2.
Source: Attorney Challenging Georgia Election Outcome Appeals Case
By Janita Kan
November 24, 2020 Updated: November 24, 2020
The attorney whose efforts to block the certification of Georgia’s 2020 election results was rejected by a federal judge has filed an appeal to the 11th Circuit Court seeking an emergency review of the lower court’s decision.
Lin Wood, an attorney with President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign, has escalated his efforts for an emergency request to prohibit the certification of the state’s election results or the tabulation of “defective absentee ballots.” He filed a notice informing the district court that he is appealing its decision to deny his emergency motion for relief to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
He said the request was made because the “Court erred in not granting the temporary restraining order for the unconstitutional, unlawful election,” according to a court filing (pdf). He also asked the court to consider the matter as a matter of urgency because presidential electors will meet on Dec. 14.
Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Steven Grimberg dismissed Wood’s efforts to delay the vote certification in the state, ruling that the attorney lacked legal standing as an individual voter to challenge Georgia’s election procedures.
Wood filed a lawsuit (pdf) against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and other state officials on Nov. 13, arguing that an agreement between election officials and the state’s Democratic Party that changed the process of handling absentee ballots in Georgia is unconstitutional.
Under the U.S. Constitution, only state legislatures and Congress can prescribe the “times, places, and manner of holding elections.”
He argues that the state officials were unauthorized to change the manner of processing absentee ballots in a way that was contrary with the state election code, and hence, the counting of absentee ballots for the general election in the state is, therefore, “improper and must not be permitted.”
“To allow otherwise would erode the sacred and basic rights of Georgia citizens under the United States Constitution to participate in and rely upon a free and fair election,” Wood wrote.
The March 2020 agreement between Raffensperger, the State Election Board, and various state Democratic entities changed the way absentee ballots are processed in a way that isn’t consistent with election laws passed by the Georgia Legislature.
According to the agreement, county officials are required to form a committee of three people if any one official believes an absentee ballot is defective because the voter’s signature on the ballot envelope doesn’t match the signature on file. If a majority in the committee determines that the signature doesn’t match, it can then “reject” the ballot.
“Under the Litigation Settlement, any determination of a signature mismatch would lead to the cumbersome process described in the settlement, which was not intended by the Georgia Legislature, which authorized those decisions to be made by single election officials,” Wood argues in the lawsuit.
“The Litigation Settlement by itself has created confusion, misplaced incentives, and undermined the confidence of the voters of the State of Georgia in the electoral system. Neither it nor any of the activities spawned by it were authorized by the Georgia Legislature, as required by the United States Constitution.”
In response to Grimberg’s ruling, Wood characterized the judge’s ruling on his request for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction as “unclear.”
“He may have overreached to dismiss my claim that [the] election was unlawful due to [Georgia Secretary of State] consent agreement,” Wood said in a statement on Twitter, referring to the March agreement.
“The recount issue was separate from unlawful election issue. Sounded like Court thinks a GA voter has NO standing to challenge unlawful federal election,” he wrote. “Lawyer for [Secretary of State] suggested only state [Attorney General] could do so. What? [Attorney General] represents [Secretary of State]. Makes no sense.”
On Monday, Wood served a subpoena on State Farm Arena, a ballot counting location in the state, seeking video footage filmed on the premises during and after Election Day.
The Trump campaign had requested a recount, which is expected to be completed by 11:59 p.m. on Dec. 2.
Source: Attorney Challenging Georgia Election Outcome Appeals Case
This is one of several BIG lawsuits filed in Georgia this week!
This article includes a link to the pdf so you can read what Powell filed.
Sidney Powell Files Lawsuit in Georgia Alleging ‘Massive Election Fraud’
By Mimi Nguyen Ly
November 26, 2020 Updated: November 26, 2020
Print
Attorney Sidney Powell filed a federal lawsuit late Wednesday alleging “massive election fraud” and multiple violations of the Constitution and Georgia’s state laws in the 2020 general election, as well as issues pertaining to Dominion Voting Systems.
The civil action alleges that the purpose of the scheme was for “illegally and fraudulently manipulating the vote count to make certain the election of Joe Biden as president of the United States.” A similar separate suit was filed in Michigan.
The Georgia suit (pdf) was filed in the U.S. District Court Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division against Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and other election officials.
The suit seeks to compel the court to invalidate the election results in Georgia. It was filed on behalf of plaintiffs including Republican Party nominees for the electoral college, the chairman of the Cobb County Republican Party Jason Shepherd, and the Assistant Secretary of the Georgia Republican Party, Brian Jay Van Gundy.
The 104-page complaint argues that “incontrovertible evidence Board of Elections records demonstrates that at least 96,600 absentee ballots were requested and counted but were never recorded as being returned to county election boards by the voter. Thus, at a minimum, 96,600 votes must be disregarded.”
According to the suit, fraud was also allegedly “executed by many means” but the “most troubling, insidious, and egregious” way was the “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned ‘ballot-stuffing.'” It alleges computerized ballot-stuffing and manipulation by software created and run by domestic and foreign actors. The complaint cited affidavits from multiple witnesses, documentation, as well as expert testimony that raised “sheer mathematical impossibilities” in the election results supporting the claims.
“Especially egregious conduct arose in Forsyth, Paulding, Cherokee, Hall, and Barrow County,” the complaint reads. “This scheme and artifice to defraud affected tens of thousands of votes in Georgia alone and ‘rigged’ the election in Georgia for Joe Biden.”
In particular, the suit took issue with election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems, which it noted was recently purchased and “rushed into use” by Kemp, Raffensperger, and the Georgia Board of Elections.
Plaintiffs allege that the design and features of the Dominion software do not allow for a simple audit to see whether votes were misallocated, redistributed, or deleted, pointing to a Jan. 24 decision by the Texas secretary of state to deny certifying the software “because of a lack of evidence of efficiency and accuracy and to be safe from fraud and unauthorized manipulation.”
“First, the system’s central accumulator does not include a protected real-time audit log that maintains the date and time stamps of all significant election events. Key components of the system utilize unprotected logs,” the filing reads. “Essentially this allows an unauthorized user the opportunity to arbitrarily add, modify, or remove log entries, causing the machine to log election events that do not reflect actual voting tabulations—or more specifically, do not reflect the actual votes of or the will of the people.”
The suit also alleges “incontrovertible physical evidence that the standards of physical security of the voting machines and the software were breached, and machines were connected to the Internet in violation of professional standards and state and federal laws.”
Part of the suit mentions a delay in voting at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, where video on Nov. 3 shows that election workers “falsely claimed a water leak required the facility to close.” It adds, “All poll workers and challengers were evacuated for several hours at about 10:00 PM. However, several election workers remained unsupervised and unchallenged working at the computers for the voting tabulation machines until after 1:00 AM.”
Another part of the complaint said that cybersecurity expert Navid Keshavarz-Nia testified that “U.S. intelligence services had developed tools to infiltrate foreign voting systems including Dominion.” Pointing to vulnerabilities in the Dominion’s software, he claims that “hundreds of thousands of votes” were transferred from President Donald Trump to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden in battleground states.
The complaint also cites a former electronic intelligence analyst under the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion, who declared that the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran to monitor and manipulate elections, including the 2020 U.S. general election.
A former U.S. Military Intelligence expert had analyzed the Dominion software system and concluded that the system and software “were certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China,” according to another part of the complaint.
“By using servers and employees connected with rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable leaked credentials, Dominion neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent one in 2020,” the filing said.
The lawsuit also claims: “Georgia’s election officials and poll workers exacerbated and helped, whether knowingly or unknowingly, the Dominion system carry out massive voter manipulation by refusing to observe statutory safeguards for absentee ballots. Election officials failed to verify signatures and check security envelopes. They barred challengers from observing the count, which also facilitated the fraud.”
The Georgia secretary of state and Dominion Voting Systems did not immediately respond to The Epoch Times’ requests for comment on the suit.
Dominion released a statement on Wednesday saying, “Claims that Dominion deleted or switched votes are completely false. Dominion systems are 100 percent auditable.”
The lawsuit comes after election results were certified for Georgia on Nov. 20. At the time, Kemp did not clearly endorse the results but said the law required him to “formalize the certification, which paves the way for the Trump campaign to pursue other legal options and a separate recount if they choose.”
Source: Sidney Powell Files Lawsuit in Georgia Alleging 'Massive Election Fraud'
This article includes a link to the pdf so you can read what Powell filed.
Sidney Powell Files Lawsuit in Georgia Alleging ‘Massive Election Fraud’
By Mimi Nguyen Ly
November 26, 2020 Updated: November 26, 2020
Attorney Sidney Powell filed a federal lawsuit late Wednesday alleging “massive election fraud” and multiple violations of the Constitution and Georgia’s state laws in the 2020 general election, as well as issues pertaining to Dominion Voting Systems.
The civil action alleges that the purpose of the scheme was for “illegally and fraudulently manipulating the vote count to make certain the election of Joe Biden as president of the United States.” A similar separate suit was filed in Michigan.
The Georgia suit (pdf) was filed in the U.S. District Court Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division against Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, and other election officials.
The suit seeks to compel the court to invalidate the election results in Georgia. It was filed on behalf of plaintiffs including Republican Party nominees for the electoral college, the chairman of the Cobb County Republican Party Jason Shepherd, and the Assistant Secretary of the Georgia Republican Party, Brian Jay Van Gundy.
The 104-page complaint argues that “incontrovertible evidence Board of Elections records demonstrates that at least 96,600 absentee ballots were requested and counted but were never recorded as being returned to county election boards by the voter. Thus, at a minimum, 96,600 votes must be disregarded.”
According to the suit, fraud was also allegedly “executed by many means” but the “most troubling, insidious, and egregious” way was the “systemic adaptation of old-fashioned ‘ballot-stuffing.'” It alleges computerized ballot-stuffing and manipulation by software created and run by domestic and foreign actors. The complaint cited affidavits from multiple witnesses, documentation, as well as expert testimony that raised “sheer mathematical impossibilities” in the election results supporting the claims.
“Especially egregious conduct arose in Forsyth, Paulding, Cherokee, Hall, and Barrow County,” the complaint reads. “This scheme and artifice to defraud affected tens of thousands of votes in Georgia alone and ‘rigged’ the election in Georgia for Joe Biden.”
In particular, the suit took issue with election software and hardware from Dominion Voting Systems, which it noted was recently purchased and “rushed into use” by Kemp, Raffensperger, and the Georgia Board of Elections.
Plaintiffs allege that the design and features of the Dominion software do not allow for a simple audit to see whether votes were misallocated, redistributed, or deleted, pointing to a Jan. 24 decision by the Texas secretary of state to deny certifying the software “because of a lack of evidence of efficiency and accuracy and to be safe from fraud and unauthorized manipulation.”
“First, the system’s central accumulator does not include a protected real-time audit log that maintains the date and time stamps of all significant election events. Key components of the system utilize unprotected logs,” the filing reads. “Essentially this allows an unauthorized user the opportunity to arbitrarily add, modify, or remove log entries, causing the machine to log election events that do not reflect actual voting tabulations—or more specifically, do not reflect the actual votes of or the will of the people.”
The suit also alleges “incontrovertible physical evidence that the standards of physical security of the voting machines and the software were breached, and machines were connected to the Internet in violation of professional standards and state and federal laws.”
Part of the suit mentions a delay in voting at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, where video on Nov. 3 shows that election workers “falsely claimed a water leak required the facility to close.” It adds, “All poll workers and challengers were evacuated for several hours at about 10:00 PM. However, several election workers remained unsupervised and unchallenged working at the computers for the voting tabulation machines until after 1:00 AM.”
Another part of the complaint said that cybersecurity expert Navid Keshavarz-Nia testified that “U.S. intelligence services had developed tools to infiltrate foreign voting systems including Dominion.” Pointing to vulnerabilities in the Dominion’s software, he claims that “hundreds of thousands of votes” were transferred from President Donald Trump to Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden in battleground states.
The complaint also cites a former electronic intelligence analyst under the 305th Military Intelligence Battalion, who declared that the Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran to monitor and manipulate elections, including the 2020 U.S. general election.
A former U.S. Military Intelligence expert had analyzed the Dominion software system and concluded that the system and software “were certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China,” according to another part of the complaint.
“By using servers and employees connected with rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable leaked credentials, Dominion neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent one in 2020,” the filing said.
The lawsuit also claims: “Georgia’s election officials and poll workers exacerbated and helped, whether knowingly or unknowingly, the Dominion system carry out massive voter manipulation by refusing to observe statutory safeguards for absentee ballots. Election officials failed to verify signatures and check security envelopes. They barred challengers from observing the count, which also facilitated the fraud.”
The Georgia secretary of state and Dominion Voting Systems did not immediately respond to The Epoch Times’ requests for comment on the suit.
Dominion released a statement on Wednesday saying, “Claims that Dominion deleted or switched votes are completely false. Dominion systems are 100 percent auditable.”
The lawsuit comes after election results were certified for Georgia on Nov. 20. At the time, Kemp did not clearly endorse the results but said the law required him to “formalize the certification, which paves the way for the Trump campaign to pursue other legal options and a separate recount if they choose.”
Source: Sidney Powell Files Lawsuit in Georgia Alleging 'Massive Election Fraud'
Last edited:
Poll Watcher Describes Pennsylvania Election Irregularities, Including 47 Missing USB Cards
By Tom Ozimek
November 26, 2020 Updated: November 26, 2020
Print
A Republican poll observer from Pennsylvania’s Delaware County, told a Senate GOP Policy Committee hearing in Gettysburg on Wednesday, that he witnessed a range of Election Day irregularities, including 47 USB cards that went missing.
Greg Stenstrom, who, besides being a poll watcher, said he is an expert in security fraud, told the hearing that he witnessed a number of chain-of-custody violations, including around mail-in ballots, the balance of votes from drop boxes, and the handling of USB card flash drives—all of which he said broke rules defined by the Delaware County Board of Elections and the election process review.
“They didn’t follow one,” Stenstrom said. “It shocked me that this could happen,” he added.
He described witnessing a situation in which data on USB cards was uploaded to voting machines by a warehouse superviser without being observed by a poll watcher, which he said he saw happening at least 24 times.
“He’s walking in with baggies, which we have pictures of and that were submitted in our affidavits,” Stenstrom said, adding that Democrat poll watchers also witnessed this occurrence.
Stenstrom said he was told by an attorney that it’s normal for several USB cards to be left in machines and then brought back by the warehouse manager for input into tally systems. He added that when he later raised the issue with U.S. Attorney General William McSwain and some law enforcement officers, he was told it is unusual for more than two drives to be left in voting machines.
He said he was later told that “these 24 to 30 cards that were uploaded” were unaccounted for, adding that “as of today, 47 USB v-cards are missing.”
“People ask me all the time, how do people commit crimes? I know there’s a lot of theories here. And I always look for the simplest thing. People that stuff…stick USB sticks in, putting ballots in—a very simple thing. Only takes a couple of people, doesn’t take a big conspiracy,” he said.
“As a forensic computer scientist, my interest is in the data—where did it go? Where did the spoilage go? How did the data come in and go out of the system?” he said, and called for an audit.
Stenstrom also said that it recently emerged that “virtually all chain of custody logs, records, yellow sheets, everything was gone” in Delaware County.
“They had a signing party where they sat down, and coworkers were invited back to recreate those logs,” he said. “And our understanding as of today was that they were unsuccessful in getting them all.”
He said the situation is that there are up to 120,000 ballots that remain “in question.”
“There’s no cure for this, no remedy for this,” he said, adding, “I don’t believe, as a citizen and an observer to this, that anybody could certify that vote in good conscience.”
At the same hearing, President Donald Trump’s attorney Rudy Giuliani said that the type of election irregularities witnesses described in Pennsylvania also occurred in other battleground states.
“What we’re going to describe to you, with these witnesses, happened in roughly the same way in Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Georgia—the primary device was mail-in ballots,” Giuliani said, characterizing the election in Pennsylvania as a “sham.”
“We don’t want to disenfranchise anyone. We want to disqualify 672,000 votes so 72 million people are not disenfranchised, because that’s what happened by the cheating that went on here,” Giuliani said.
The former New York City mayor also suggested to Pennsylvania GOP state senators that they have the power to vote and choose their own electors, saying that the Constitution stipulates that state legislators have the authority to nullify a state’s electors and can send their own to the electoral college. Pennsylvania’s House and Senate are both controlled by Republicans. The electoral college meets on Dec. 14.
Pennsylvania Senate Democrats, in response to the GOP hearing, said Giuliani is “[peddling] unsubstantiated voter fraud claims in any place that will have him” and won’t accept the “loss with grace or a modicum of dignity.”
On Tuesday, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, announced that the results of the election were certified by the Secretary of State’s office. Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and Michigan’s Board of Canvassers also certified their elections, although legal challenges are pending.
However, Pennsylvania Commonwealth Judge Patricia McCullough on Wednesday ordered the state to not take any further steps to complete the certification of the presidential race. She also blocked the certification of all the other election results.
Pennsylvania’s Democratic Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar said she has seen no evidence of voter fraud or mass irregularities that would overturn the election results in the state. State data shows that Biden leads Trump by about 80,000 votes. Other secretaries in other states where the results are being challenged have echoed those claims.
Source: Poll Watcher Describes Pennsylvania Election Irregularities, Including 47 Missing USB Cards
By Tom Ozimek
November 26, 2020 Updated: November 26, 2020
A Republican poll observer from Pennsylvania’s Delaware County, told a Senate GOP Policy Committee hearing in Gettysburg on Wednesday, that he witnessed a range of Election Day irregularities, including 47 USB cards that went missing.
Greg Stenstrom, who, besides being a poll watcher, said he is an expert in security fraud, told the hearing that he witnessed a number of chain-of-custody violations, including around mail-in ballots, the balance of votes from drop boxes, and the handling of USB card flash drives—all of which he said broke rules defined by the Delaware County Board of Elections and the election process review.
“They didn’t follow one,” Stenstrom said. “It shocked me that this could happen,” he added.
He described witnessing a situation in which data on USB cards was uploaded to voting machines by a warehouse superviser without being observed by a poll watcher, which he said he saw happening at least 24 times.
“He’s walking in with baggies, which we have pictures of and that were submitted in our affidavits,” Stenstrom said, adding that Democrat poll watchers also witnessed this occurrence.
Stenstrom said he was told by an attorney that it’s normal for several USB cards to be left in machines and then brought back by the warehouse manager for input into tally systems. He added that when he later raised the issue with U.S. Attorney General William McSwain and some law enforcement officers, he was told it is unusual for more than two drives to be left in voting machines.
He said he was later told that “these 24 to 30 cards that were uploaded” were unaccounted for, adding that “as of today, 47 USB v-cards are missing.”
“People ask me all the time, how do people commit crimes? I know there’s a lot of theories here. And I always look for the simplest thing. People that stuff…stick USB sticks in, putting ballots in—a very simple thing. Only takes a couple of people, doesn’t take a big conspiracy,” he said.
“As a forensic computer scientist, my interest is in the data—where did it go? Where did the spoilage go? How did the data come in and go out of the system?” he said, and called for an audit.
Stenstrom also said that it recently emerged that “virtually all chain of custody logs, records, yellow sheets, everything was gone” in Delaware County.
“They had a signing party where they sat down, and coworkers were invited back to recreate those logs,” he said. “And our understanding as of today was that they were unsuccessful in getting them all.”
He said the situation is that there are up to 120,000 ballots that remain “in question.”
“There’s no cure for this, no remedy for this,” he said, adding, “I don’t believe, as a citizen and an observer to this, that anybody could certify that vote in good conscience.”
At the same hearing, President Donald Trump’s attorney Rudy Giuliani said that the type of election irregularities witnesses described in Pennsylvania also occurred in other battleground states.
“What we’re going to describe to you, with these witnesses, happened in roughly the same way in Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Georgia—the primary device was mail-in ballots,” Giuliani said, characterizing the election in Pennsylvania as a “sham.”
“We don’t want to disenfranchise anyone. We want to disqualify 672,000 votes so 72 million people are not disenfranchised, because that’s what happened by the cheating that went on here,” Giuliani said.
The former New York City mayor also suggested to Pennsylvania GOP state senators that they have the power to vote and choose their own electors, saying that the Constitution stipulates that state legislators have the authority to nullify a state’s electors and can send their own to the electoral college. Pennsylvania’s House and Senate are both controlled by Republicans. The electoral college meets on Dec. 14.
Pennsylvania Senate Democrats, in response to the GOP hearing, said Giuliani is “[peddling] unsubstantiated voter fraud claims in any place that will have him” and won’t accept the “loss with grace or a modicum of dignity.”
On Tuesday, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, announced that the results of the election were certified by the Secretary of State’s office. Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and Michigan’s Board of Canvassers also certified their elections, although legal challenges are pending.
However, Pennsylvania Commonwealth Judge Patricia McCullough on Wednesday ordered the state to not take any further steps to complete the certification of the presidential race. She also blocked the certification of all the other election results.
Pennsylvania’s Democratic Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar said she has seen no evidence of voter fraud or mass irregularities that would overturn the election results in the state. State data shows that Biden leads Trump by about 80,000 votes. Other secretaries in other states where the results are being challenged have echoed those claims.
Source: Poll Watcher Describes Pennsylvania Election Irregularities, Including 47 Missing USB Cards
Legal Group Files Lawsuit Challenging Over 200,000 Ballots in Georgia
By Zachary Stieber
November 26, 2020 Updated: November 26, 2020
Print
A legal group on Wednesday filed a lawsuit alleging over 100,000 illegal votes were counted in Georgia, while tens of thousands of legal votes weren’t counted.
According to the suit, the estimated number of such votes exceeds 200,000.
“Because of these irregularities, no one knows who really won Georgia’s presidential election. So, the election result should be nullified and the appointment of the electors should revert to the state legislature, as provided in Article II of the United States Constitution,” the 28-page document states.
The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society brought the suit on behalf of John Wood, president of the Georgia Voters Alliance.
The legal group relied on data from Matthew Braynard, an analyst who has been researching election results in battleground states. Dr. Qianying Zhang provided an accompanying report based on statistical extrapolation of Braynard’s data analysis.
According to Braynard, over 138,000 Georgia residents voted where they did not reside, some 20,000 of absentee ballots were requested which were not asked for by the person identified in Georgia’s database, and over 20,000 out-of-state residents voted in Georgia.
Another 43,688 legal votes were allegedly not counted.
“The number of potentially fraudulent ballots we’ve identified in Georgia is over 15 times greater than the margin separating Donald Trump and Joe Biden. This finding undercuts the integrity of the general election,” said Phill Kline, director of The Amistad Project, in a statement.
“The discrepancies we identified arose in large part because certain election officials acted with greater fealty to the dictates of private funders than to the laws set forth by the people’s representatives in the General Assembly.”
The failures to conduct the election properly were encouraged and facilitated by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg through a leftist organization called the Center for Tech and Civic Life, according to the suit.
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, has not responded to the suit. His office didn’t respond to a request for comment.
According to official election results from Georgia, Democratic nominee Joe Biden won the state by 13,330 over President Trump.
Georgia conducted a hand audit following the election because of the close margin. The audit uncovered thousands of uncounted ballots, which primarily went for Trump. The discoveries cut Biden’s lead by around 1,400.
Georgia workers are engaged in a second recount, per a request from the Trump campaign.
The recount is needed to ensure “that every aspect of Georgia State Law and the U.S. Constitution are followed so that every legal vote is counted,” the campaign said in a statement.
Several other major lawsuits are being considered in Georgia.
In one, attorney Lin Wood is seeking information about an alleged pipe burst in Fulton County on Election Day. Wood is seeking to block certification of the election results. An appeal in that case was granted on Wednesday.
Source: Legal Group Files Lawsuit Challenging Over 200,000 Ballots in Georgia
By Zachary Stieber
November 26, 2020 Updated: November 26, 2020
A legal group on Wednesday filed a lawsuit alleging over 100,000 illegal votes were counted in Georgia, while tens of thousands of legal votes weren’t counted.
According to the suit, the estimated number of such votes exceeds 200,000.
“Because of these irregularities, no one knows who really won Georgia’s presidential election. So, the election result should be nullified and the appointment of the electors should revert to the state legislature, as provided in Article II of the United States Constitution,” the 28-page document states.
The Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society brought the suit on behalf of John Wood, president of the Georgia Voters Alliance.
The legal group relied on data from Matthew Braynard, an analyst who has been researching election results in battleground states. Dr. Qianying Zhang provided an accompanying report based on statistical extrapolation of Braynard’s data analysis.
According to Braynard, over 138,000 Georgia residents voted where they did not reside, some 20,000 of absentee ballots were requested which were not asked for by the person identified in Georgia’s database, and over 20,000 out-of-state residents voted in Georgia.
Another 43,688 legal votes were allegedly not counted.
“The number of potentially fraudulent ballots we’ve identified in Georgia is over 15 times greater than the margin separating Donald Trump and Joe Biden. This finding undercuts the integrity of the general election,” said Phill Kline, director of The Amistad Project, in a statement.
“The discrepancies we identified arose in large part because certain election officials acted with greater fealty to the dictates of private funders than to the laws set forth by the people’s representatives in the General Assembly.”
The failures to conduct the election properly were encouraged and facilitated by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg through a leftist organization called the Center for Tech and Civic Life, according to the suit.
Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, has not responded to the suit. His office didn’t respond to a request for comment.
According to official election results from Georgia, Democratic nominee Joe Biden won the state by 13,330 over President Trump.
Georgia conducted a hand audit following the election because of the close margin. The audit uncovered thousands of uncounted ballots, which primarily went for Trump. The discoveries cut Biden’s lead by around 1,400.
Georgia workers are engaged in a second recount, per a request from the Trump campaign.
The recount is needed to ensure “that every aspect of Georgia State Law and the U.S. Constitution are followed so that every legal vote is counted,” the campaign said in a statement.
Several other major lawsuits are being considered in Georgia.
In one, attorney Lin Wood is seeking information about an alleged pipe burst in Fulton County on Election Day. Wood is seeking to block certification of the election results. An appeal in that case was granted on Wednesday.
Source: Legal Group Files Lawsuit Challenging Over 200,000 Ballots in Georgia
It’s interesting that this thread never made it to the Featured Threads list even though there are enough posts and this is highly important info. Guess I’m being censored in more ways than one.
No worries! I’m trusting that God will get this info to those who need to be encouraged by it. :)
No worries! I’m trusting that God will get this info to those who need to be encouraged by it. :)
- Aug 10, 2012
- 6,098
- 7,489
- 113
- Faith
- Christian
