Completely disagree. Priesthood being a job? Well that makes me feel sick to the back teeth. All Anglicans should be Evangelical. I'm glad I belong to an Evangelical Anglican church. Jesus is the main thing, and Im keen on sticking to that
Justification by faith and just being all about Jesus and what he's done for us!
Other terms are Gospel Christians, Bible Believing, etc.
Completely disagree? You're preaching to the choir brother. As for it making you sick to the back teeth, I can tell you that it depressed me severly. People I worked with and trusted for years mentally and spiritually violated me and robbed me. Never again will I trust a man because of his religious affiliation.
So I went out and bought a new car and used it to drive away from those losers. I swore an oath to never set foot in one of their churches again.
If you are participating in a communion that allows and encourages evangelism, then you are more fortunate than you know.
It is not so everywhere. Believe me.
Count your blessings dear sir, because you got 'em.
....and if you find yourself supported by the people who call you brother, then be free to do the Lord's work as you see the need.
May God bless you and cause your work to bear much fruit.
I'm an Anglican but I'm more a a sacramental, having more in common with Roman Catholic belief and tradition than my evangelical brethren.
I don't know if your talking specifically about members of the Episcopal Church of the United States, the Church of England or the Anglican Communion in general but from my experience, those Anglcian i know who claim to be Evangelicals are nothing like the Evangelcials that you ahve in America. Most of them believe in evolution, do not take scripture litterally and still adhere for the most part to liturgical traditions which they don't always believe are neccessary but but do because of cannon law for example. I worshipped for 18 months in a Parish that called its self Evangelical and by Anglican standards it was, though in comparison to other churches it seemed most similar to the more liberal methodists and soem baptists. This church had an impressive colelction of stained glass but had no liturgical coloursl, no crucifix, no tabernacle, no stoup and during communion they used ordinary bread and wine instead of waifers and communion wine. Howeve, in the service, they used the Common Worship liturgy and the Book of COmmon prayer but never mentioned feast days except for the big ones liek Easter and Christmas and even then I can remember Easter communion being celebrated much the same as it would any other Sunday.
All well and good, but how many young people are communicants?
By that I mean working age young people; twenty-ish.
How many young families with young children?
Liturgy and sacraments and political beliefs about dead animals notwithstanding, the number of active attending members of a congregation are the true test of faith in action. That's where the rubber meets the road, so to speak. Bread, wafers, prayer books and colored robes are all trappings of religious celebration and particular tradition. That is all well and good, but if there is no young blood in the crowd the whole thing is dead. That in fact is the condition of the Episcopal church in America who count themselves part of the Anglican communion (and every week they are counted less in number).