Flat Earth Theory

[Chihuahua]

You insulted yourself - lol

Another proud knowing nothing but what the satanist taught you.

Good Bye

Just keep up with the insults. You can't defend your argument and resort to this. By the way, the term is "know nothing."

 

[David in NJ]

Just keep up with the insults. You can't defend your argument and resort to this. By the way, the term is "know nothing."

Mr. Chihuahua, you began with your insults
i just gave them back to you to keep.

You can't answer a simple question posed to all globalists by God but rather made an excuse = "poetry"

The Apostle Paul warned us of such - 1 Timothy 6:3-5
f anyone teaches otherwise and does not consent to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the [doctrine which accords with godliness, he is proud, knowing nothing, but is obsessed with disputes and arguments over words, from which come envy, strife, reviling, evil suspicions, useless wranglings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth, who suppose that godliness is a means of gain. From such withdraw yourself.

Thus i said Good Bye

 

[Chihuahua]

Mr. Chihuahua, you began with your insults
i just gave them back to you to keep.

No, I did not. Feel free to quote where I insulted you. Before you do it, me writing something you disagree with is not an insult.

You can't answer a simple question posed to all globalists by God but rather made an excuse = "poetry"

It is poetry and doesn't have anything to do with a flat Earth. God is not asking people if they believe the world is flat.
You can't even answer what is meant by "Heavens". What does searching the Earth have to do with its shape? Nothing.

The Apostle Paul warned us of such - 1 Timothy 6:3-5
f anyone teaches otherwise and does not consent to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the [doctrine which accords with godliness, he is proud, knowing nothing, but is obsessed with disputes and arguments over words, from which come envy, strife, reviling, evil suspicions, useless wranglings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth, who suppose that godliness is a means of gain. From such withdraw yourself.

Thus i said Good Bye

Just so you know, your questions are not written by God. Too bad, I was hoping you could contribute one bit of evidence of the worldwide centuries old international conspiracy. All you have is your twisting of scripture and an inability to defend you wild interpretations.

 

[David in NJ]

No, I did not. Feel free to quote where I insulted you. Before you do it, me writing something you disagree with is not an insult.


It is poetry and doesn't have anything to do with a flat Earth. God is not asking people if they believe the world is flat.
You can't even answer what is meant by "Heavens". What does searching the Earth have to do with its shape? Nothing.



Just so you know, your questions are not written by God. Too bad, I was hoping you could contribute one bit of evidence of the worldwide centuries old international conspiracy. All you have is your twisting of scripture and an inability to defend you wild interpretations.

Only by His Grace in submitting unto His Word our minds are set free to SEE

If you ever decide to answer God's Question to the globalists - let God know

i will pray for you tonight as i am not against you for God does not want us to remain in the dark

If you desire truth, please read and and ask God for His Light to escape the darkness = Isaiah 60:2

For behold, darkness covers the earth, and thick darkness is over the peoples; but the LORD will rise upon you, and His glory will appear over you.

Never underestimate the Truth - 1 John 5:19 = "the whole world is under the control of Satan"

Good Night

 

[Chihuahua]

I thought you were taking a high road after insulting me, again, with your bible verse - implying it has anything to do with anything here. If you are going to continue posting, I am still waiting for you to show where I insulted you.

 

[rvmb]

I recently moved back into town,
I'm not digging it but a friend of mine needed some help.
I now live near the end of a long, flat, straight, and most importantly LEVEL road, with several stop lights roughly one mile distant from each other. On a clear night, I can stand in the middle of the street and look down the road towards town. I have pretty good eyes for an old guy. Even so, at the very most I might be able to make out the third traffic light almost three miles away, but only the light itself, everything below has faded out of view. Its called perspective bro.

You think that Argentina should have a view of the pole star, and that makes sense, when you consider only two variables, distance and line of site. But there are for more variables at play than just those two.

Globers are always telling us about all this evidence they have and asking where is our proof. What we are saying is, you have no proof either, no more than we do. You do have a tremendous amount of evidence to support your claims, but where does that evidence come from? Can it be trusted? How was it acquired? You see, we could and would go to Antarctica and find out for ourselves, but that's a forbidden activity. We would love to get in a rocket and find out for ourselves, but only governments or the very such and powerful will ever have that opportunity. All we have, are our five senses and the word of God. You claim to have evidence, but the evidence you claim to have, cannot be tested, not by us, we aren't part of the club. Furthermore, and please don't overlook this point, your own evidence does not in anyway come from your own personal observations, but rather, completely contradicts them entirely.

If no one had told you that you lived on a spinning ball or that the sun was 90 million miles away, until long after you were allowed to live long to form your own conclusions based on your own observations to the nature of your reality, and then suddenly one day came up and told you all the same stuff that you yourself now accept as gospel truth, you would have laughed in their face, just as you are laughing in mine.

Friend, I'm not laughing at you. I'm actually trying to help, knowing full well that you think of me as a fool.

I respect & am open to constructive with agreement on step by step basics being foundational in trying to understand opposing views.
"".. long, flat, straight, .. LEVEL road, with several stop lights roughly one mile distant from each other. On a clear night,...""
100% agreed
*****
1. Using a powerful stationary tripod 100-150mm telescope mounted 1.5 meters above the sand at one end of the shown line.
2. You vehicle steadily drives away along the shown line
3. Cloudy overcast day.
3. Maximum ground level deviation is 1 meter
4. How far do you believe the vehicle would travel before the telescope operator could no longer see it ?
************

 

[Archie]

It is a bit strange that all your accomplishments center around yourself.


I didn't see you speaking in the second person or third person. Do you even know what that means? I think may a class in grade school may have escaped your notice.



Yet, here you are, using a computer. Science has contributed everything. Without it you'd be up in a tree to avoid predation eating food with the very hands you just used as toilet paper. You'd be lucky to reach puberty. Before modern medicine you'd have a ton of kids and get a handful to adulthood.

Insofar as you claiming we lost the ability to go to the moon, implying it was fake, there have been missions to the moon. It is very expensive and dangerous. I guess expensive jets flown by people didn't exist because drones are increasingly used for low cost and no risk. As far as family time, that is up to the family, not the fault of science.



Yeah, I can imagine some reasons for that.

Do you always speak to people in this manner, or only behind the safety of your keyboard?

I'm not easily angered, and if you read through my comments you will also find that I am not all that confrontational either, and when I do speak directly and matter of factly, I try to do so in a kind way.

That being said, have I done something to offend you personally? Was it the science comment? Because it seems that you have been rude, presumptuous, accusatory, and condescending since the moment you entered the thread.

I'm sorry if my comment offended you, sincerely. And as I have already stated, I probably should not have posted the rant that I did. It was intended to be a juxtaposition between the accomplishments of a man who sits behind a desk all day working to create more efficient nuclear or biological weapons and sunscreen, brain rotting cell phone apps and super absorbent tampons, and the man who devotes his time and resources to things of actual value.

Oh well

 

[Chihuahua]

Do you always speak to people in this manner, or only behind the safety of your keyboard?

Do you mean pointing out a mistake? You said you didn't speak in the first person which escaped my notice.

I'm not easily angered, and if you read through my comments you will also find that I am not all that confrontational either, and when I do speak directly and matter of factly, I try to do so in a kind way.

That being said, have I done something to offend you personally? Was it the science comment? Because it seems that you have been rude, presumptuous, accusatory, and condescending since the moment you entered the thread.

I guess you and I are reading different things. I understand some people believe if they are questioned in their ideas, they can be sensitive to it. You are suggesting that I am rude, presumptuous, accusatory and condescending. Those aren't very nice words and are generalities to write the least.

I'm sorry if my comment offended you, sincerely. And as I have already stated, I probably should not have posted the rant that I did. It was intended to be a juxtaposition between the accomplishments of a man who sits behind a desk all day working to create more efficient nuclear or biological weapons and sunscreen, brain rotting cell phone apps and super absorbent tampons, and the man who devotes his time and resources to things of actual value.

Oh well

It didn't offend me. Fire is good and it can be bad. Ignorance is what is harmful. People are being anti-science and engaging in conspiracy theories that do real harm to people. If a person wishes to live a life in seclusion or away from technology, I am all for it. I hate my cell phone and to shake my head when I see people so addicted to it. I still value it and it is a matter of necessity anymore.

 

[Archie]

Do you mean pointing out a mistake? You said you didn't speak in the first person which escaped my notice.


I guess you and I are reading different things. I understand some people believe if they are questioned in their ideas, they can be sensitive to it. You are suggesting that I am rude, presumptuous, accusatory and condescending. Those aren't very nice words and are generalities to write the least.



It didn't offend me. Fire is good and it can be bad. Ignorance is what is harmful. People are being anti-science and engaging in conspiracy theories that do real harm to people. If a person wishes to live a life in seclusion or away from technology, I am all for it. I hate my cell phone and to shake my head when I see people so addicted to it. I still value it and it is a matter of necessity anym

Are you getting paid to be here?

You don't seem personally invested, more like, intentionally oppositional.

It matters not, as I am done talking with you.

Farewell

 

[David in NJ]

I thought you were taking a high road after insulting me, again, with your bible verse - implying it has anything to do with anything here. If you are going to continue posting, I am still waiting for you to show where I insulted you.

Post 908 is the High Road to Freedom in CHRIST

"Ignorance is what is harmful.

Ignorance of God's Word is Eternally Harmful, Painful and DARKNESS

People are being anti-science and engaging in conspiracy theories that do real harm to people

Exactly as Satan claims and thus ensares the minds of men and thereby deceiving themselves

Take the High Road to FREEDOM = Philippians 2:5-11

 

[Chihuahua]

Are you getting paid to be here?

Yes. I am paid by the great international Earth-is-a-Globe Conspiracy. At EGC level 3, I am here to convince everyone to remove their tin foil hats that enable them to listen to the voices of the angels and get insights through the ancient gnostic practice of finding secrets in the bible that the folks brainwashed by Earth-is-a-Globe Conspiracy cannot see. You see, I can say this openly because the non-believers will think I am being sarcastic. Those with the ancient wisdom already know of my intentions.

You don't seem personally invested, more like, intentionally oppositional.

I am not emotionally invested. That is what happens when you use logic and facts instead of conspiracy theories that deep down, your mind says is bogus.

It matters not, as I am done talking with you.

Farewell

Well, when you have some facts to save the non-believers, feel free to resume.

 

[Chihuahua]

Post 908 is the High Road to Freedom in CHRIST

I fail to see a connection between the freedom found through faith in Christ and believing debunked theories.

Ignorance of God's Word is Eternally Harmful, Painful and DARKNESS

I am not necessarily sure of that. A neonate that dies is ignorant of God's word. Really, this has nothing to do with a false-science theory that the earth is flat.

Exactly as Satan claims and thus ensares the minds of men and thereby deceiving themselves

Take the High Road to FREEDOM = Philippians 2:5-11

I am sure Satan makes denial of a flat Earth a high priority.

 

[rvmb]

Yes. I am paid by the great international Earth-is-a-Globe Conspiracy. At EGC level 3, I am here to convince everyone to remove their tin foil hats that enable them to listen to the voices of the angels and get insights through the ancient gnostic practice of finding secrets in the bible that the folks brainwashed by Earth-is-a-Globe Conspiracy cannot see. You see, I can say this openly because the non-believers will think I am being sarcastic. Those with the ancient wisdom already know of my intentions.



I am not emotionally invested. That is what happens when you use logic and facts instead of conspiracy theories that deep down, your mind says is bogus.



Well, when you have some facts to save the non-believers, feel free to resume.

Are you interested in the Gal 2:7-9 Gospels discussion or happier to leave it alone ?

 

[Chihuahua]

Are you interested in the Gal 2:7-9 Gospels discussion or happier to leave it alone ?

I think you are confused, this is not the topic you asked about this. It was in Do you believe in biological evolution. My response:

The topic is Do you Believe in Biological Evolution. If you want to begin another topic it seems a bit rude to begin one in a topic initiated by another person. I do not understand the relevance of "the Gal 2:7-9 Gospels teachings in ALL the early Bibles, which of the early Bible do you prefer ?" to this topic.

I further confused by the question.

Galatians is not a Gospel, it is an Epistle.
It doesn't really touch on the Gospels in those verses.
I am not sure what you mean by "ALL the early Bibles" That is a rather complicated topic depending on where and when.

 

[rvmb]

I think you are confused, this is not the topic you asked about this. It was in Do you believe in biological evolution. My response:

""Galatians is not a Gospel, it is an Epistle.""
No confusion there since that was not the claim
Gal 2:7-9 writes who teaches what to who
The Gospel that Paul taught is Eph 1:13, 1 Cor 15:1-4.

 

[Chihuahua]

""Galatians is not a Gospel, it is an Epistle.""
No confusion there since that was not the claim
Gal 2:7-9 writes who teaches what to who
The Gospel that Paul taught is Eph 1:13, 1 Cor 15:1-4.

...And?? Whatever this is is unrelated to the topic and you tried derailing with it elsewhere. I would suggest you make your own topic which I will respond to or explain how it relates.

 

[rvmb]

...And?? Whatever this is is unrelated to the topic and you tried derailing with it elsewhere. I would suggest you make your own topic which I will respond to or explain how it relates.

Having a bad day Chi ?

 

[Chihuahua]

Having a bad day Chi ?

Not at all. If you wish to discuss whatever that is about that is fine. I suggest either explaining how it relates to this topic and what your point is, or create a topic to prevent derailment and we can go from there. You need to explain what you are getting at. This sort of response is not constructive.

 

[Archie]

Yes. I am paid by the great international Earth-is-a-Globe Conspiracy. At EGC level 3, I am here to convince everyone to remove their tin foil hats that enable them to listen to the voices of the angels and get insights through the ancient gnostic practice of finding secrets in the bible that the folks brainwashed by Earth-is-a-Globe Conspiracy cannot see. You see, I can say this openly because the non-believers will think I am being sarcastic. Those with the ancient wisdom already know of my intentions.



I am not emotionally invested. That is what happens when you use logic and facts instead of conspiracy theories that deep down, your mind says is bogus.



Well, when you have some facts to save the non-believers, feel free to resume.

This is your second day on the forum, it is my last. I don't like arguments or debate, argument and debate is pretty much all that happens here. You do occasionally meet good and decent people that lift your spirits and sharpen your mind, but rarely. So I've decided to get back into my books and the host of other tangible things that add value to my life, and leave this place behind.

I'd like to say its been a pleasure, but with all my obvious faults, dishonesty is not among their number. Do enjoy your stay.

 

[rvmb]

I did not say "emotionally", I used the word personally. There is a difference. Someone who just joined the forum yesterday, and speaks as you do, may have other interests, perhaps financial, that cause them to be here. But after all, I am a conspiracy theorist, so maybe I'm just being suspicious.

At your suggestion, I will remove my tin foil hat for a moment and present my other hypothesis.

The way you speak to people suggests you don't have many friends, the shallowness of your arguments suggest you are educated just well enough check the readings and adjust the dials in your laboratory. The face on your badge is probably full of blemishes and void of anything resembling a smile, which probably comes from eating to many hot pockets in mothers basement. Your life is dull and void of meaning, because you have fully embraced the idea that your ancestors swung from trees and one day the sun will explode returning you to the nothingness from which you came. You're insecure, disingenuous and struggle with reading comprehension. And yet you enjoy picking apart another persons grammar because of the wholly imagined sense of superiority you get by belittling others. You presume to have insight into the character and motivations of people you have never met, but are void of character or insight yourself.

I personally do not care much for presumption or making presumptuous statements, but since you started this little game, why not play along?

Of course, I'm probably well wide of the mark in everything I said, and well aware of it. But like yourself, I enjoy being an ahole from time to time. Where you and I differ in this regard, is I know when I'm being a prick, where in your case, its simply the default setting.

This is your second day on the forum, it is my last. I don't like arguments or debate, argument and debate is pretty much all that happens here. You do occasionally meet good and decent people that lift your spirits and sharpen your mind, but rarely. So I've decided to get back into my books and the host of other tangible things that add value to my life, and leave this place behind.

I'd like to say its been a pleasure, but with all my obvious faults, dishonesty is not among their number. Do enjoy your stay.

The final word is yours, make better use of it than you have thus far.

Farewell Chihuahua, the name suits you well.

You're the second person in this conversation that has him on ignore :)