Absolute straw man. "Taking the stance," no less. Give me a break.By your words, you are taking the stance that the Blood Christ cannot remove sins, which is making it equivalent to the blood of "animal sacrifices".
Why do we all love so much to level charges of heresy at each other? I don't do that. And I don't understand the urge to. I pose questions and people ascribe motive and judge me. And I'm not the only one. Why would I want to accuse someone of a broad offense based on some isolated remark? And then belittle them by insisting they "don't understand" some basic tenet of the faith?
You should really study the Sanctuary services in the Old Testament (Just a suggestion). They illustrate the disposition of sin. They are ensamples (1 Corinthians 10:11). God didn't have the Hebrews slaughter millions of innocent animals merely for a grotesque display. It was and is an object lesson. It helps us to understand that which was not discernible by the 5 senses at Calvary. So much was going on in the supernatural realm. Calvary is the Grand Centerpiece of time, space, and consciousness. But it is not the end of atonement. That is not what "It is finished" means. The resurrection and ascension prove that much.
Please do not respond with a quiz. I f you have something to say, say it.