HOW DID GOD IMPREGNATE MARY?

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Grailhunter

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2019
14,583
6,262
113
69
FARMINGTON
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
How did God impregnate Miriam? That is the question but just as important is how did Christianity develop such a negative view towards sexuality when there is nothing to support that in the scriptures?

So did Yahweh have sex with Miriam? AAHHHHH!!!! God would not have had sex with Miriam, sex is dirty, nasty, sinful, and of the devil! That is sacrilegious!! Evil! Demonic!!!!

As a Theologian I run into this type of ignorance quite often. I worship with several different denominations and because I love Christians.....I tolerate the ignorance. Over the years Christianity developed a negative view of sexuality. There are some people that see the whole process as sinful. They see the initial attraction that a couples have for each other as lust. And some thought/think even sex after marriage is considered sinful. Part of this was caused by the false doctrine of Original Sin. Where sin itself is created by sex and impregnation. Babies born with sin go to Hell if they die. (False beliefs are powerful and harmful.) My ministry is to expose false beliefs and explain the truth, even if they do not believe me, Christians deserve to at least be told the truth.

As far as debating whether Yahweh had sex with Miriam to impregnate her, or not? The scriptures say what they say and they use all the terms associated with normal procreation and no terms like miraculous or manifested or created are used. But the Bible does use the words begotten, conceive, and impregnate (to be with child) and gave birth and born. Father and Son. Normal words for the normal process of procreation.

And what was the purpose of the New Covenant?

The salvation of Man Kind.

Establishing a closer relationship with Yahweh.

Opening the gates of Heaven to Mankind.

Well the impregnation of Miriam was a closer relationship. God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son.

In fact, as far as biblical descriptions of the sexual act, Yahweh’s impregnation of Miriam is the most detailed account of the sexual union in the entire Bible. Usually the scriptures are more modest referring to it as knowing, like “he knew his wife” or… And Seth lived a hundred and five years, and begot Enosh. Or A loving doe, a graceful deer-- may her breasts satisfy you always, may you ever be intoxicated with her love. Proverbs 5:19 Or the sexual symbolisms in the Songs of Solomon.

The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. Luke 1:35

But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary; you have found favor with God. You will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to call him Jesus. Luke 1:30-31

Then again other than it was Yahweh impregnating Miriam, was there anything miraculous happening…..and if it was Yahweh miraculously causing Miriam to be pregnant, would Yeshua be the actual Son of Yahweh or a creation? There are accounts in the Bible of Yahweh causing women to be pregnant but their offspring were not sons of God.

And for those that believe that Yeshua was preexisting….how did He do it? Did He make Himself a fetus and beam Himself into Miriam’s womb. And again, if that is what happened, how could He be the Son of God. Kind of hocus pocus and sci-fi-ish. It would just be Him. And the Bible says she gave birth….so she was not a virgin….He did not beam Himself out.

One of the reasons that there are over 30,000 Protestant denominations is because people want to superimpose what they like or believe over and above the scriptures. 30,000 attempts to get it right but never really did, when their beliefs would be more accurate if they just let the scriptures guide their beliefs rather than trying to twist the scriptures to what they believe.

But still for me, I do not care how Yahweh impregnated Miriam, I am just taking the scriptures for what they say, what else should a Theologian do? I was born without a fear bone so I am perfectly suited for standing up for the Word of God.

So then ask yourselves this question; How did Christianity come up with this negative view of sexuality, if it is not in the scriptures? God could kill, but He would not have sex?

The Johnny Appleseed of Truth.
Be good and do good.
 
Last edited:

Zao is life

Well-Known Member
Oct 3, 2020
5,244
1,865
113
Africa
Faith
Christian
Country
South Africa
Gender
Male
How did God impregnate Miriam? That is the question but just as important is how did Christianity develop such a negative view towards sexuality when there is nothing to support that in the scriptures?

So did Yahweh have sex with Miriam? AAHHHHH!!!! God would not have had sex with Miriam, sex is dirty, nasty, sinful, and of the devil! That is sacrilegious!! Evil! Demonic!!!!

As a Theologian I run into this type of ignorance quite often. I worship with several different denominations and because I love Christians.....I tolerate the ignorance. Over the years Christianity developed a negative view of sexuality. There are some people that see the whole process as sinful. They see the initial attraction that a couples have for each other as lust. And some thought/think even sex after marriage is considered sinful. Part of this was caused by the false doctrine of Original Sin. Where sin itself is created by sex and impregnation. Babies born with sin go to Hell if they die. (False beliefs are powerful and harmful.) My ministry is to expose false beliefs and explain the truth, even if they do not believe me, Christians deserve to at least be told the truth.

As far as debating whether Yahweh had sex with Miriam to impregnate her, or not? The scriptures say what they say and they use all the terms associated with normal procreation and no terms like miraculous or manifested or created are used. But the Bible does use the words begotten, conceive, and impregnate (to be with child) and gave birth and born. Father and Son. Normal words for the normal process of procreation.

And what was the purpose of the New Covenant?

The salvation of Man Kind.

Establishing a closer relationship with Yahweh.

Opening the gates of Heaven to Mankind.

Well the impregnation of Miriam was a closer relationship. God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son.

In fact, as far as biblical descriptions of the sexual act, Yahweh’s impregnation of Miriam is the most detailed account of the sexual union in the entire Bible. Usually the scriptures are more modest referring to it as knowing, like “he knew his wife” or… And Seth lived a hundred and five years, and begot Enosh. Or A loving doe, a graceful deer-- may her breasts satisfy you always, may you ever be intoxicated with her love. Proverbs 5:19 Or the sexual symbolisms in the Songs of Solomon.

The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. Luke 1:35

But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary; you have found favor with God. You will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to call him Jesus. Luke 1:30-31

Then again other than it was Yahweh impregnating Miriam, was there anything miraculous happening…..and if it was Yahweh miraculously causing Miriam to be pregnant, would Yeshua be the actual Son of Yahweh or a creation? There are accounts in the Bible of Yahweh causing women to be pregnant but their offspring were not sons of God.

And for those that believe that Yeshua was preexisting….how did He do it? Did He make Himself a fetus and beam Himself into Miriam’s womb. And again, if that is what happened, how could He be the Son of God. Kind of hocus pocus and sci-fi-ish. It would just be Him. And the Bible says she gave birth….so she was not a virgin….He did not beam Himself out.

One of the reasons that there are over 30,000 Protestant denominations is because people want to superimpose what they like or believe over and above the scriptures. 30,000 attempts to get it right but never really did, when their beliefs would be more accurate if they just let the scriptures guide their beliefs rather than trying to twist the scriptures to what they believe.

But still for me, I do not care how Yahweh impregnated Miriam, I am just taking the scriptures for what they say, what else should a Theologian do? I was born without a fear bone so I am perfectly suited for standing up for the Word of God.

So then ask yourselves this question; How did Christianity come up with this negative view of sexuality, if it is not in the scriptures? God could kill, but He would not have sex?

The Johnny Appleseed of Truth.
Be good and do good.

Hebrews 2
16 For verily he (Jesus) took not on him [G1949 epilambanomai] the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

G1949 epilambanomai
middle voice from 1909 and 2983; to seize (for help, injury, attainment, or any other purpose; literally or figuratively):--catch, lay hold (up-)on, take (by, hold of, on).
see GREEK for 1909
see GREEK for 2983

Hebrews 2
14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same. -- Hebrews 2:14.

He partook of flesh and blood, taking upon Himself flesh and blood - the DNA of which had already been created by God through Him, who is the Creator of all things.

When any other human woman conceives, the DNA is passed on by both the (human) father and the mother.

John 4
24 God is a spirit, and they who worship Him must worship in spirit and in truth.

Luke 1
35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Spirit shall come upon you, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow you: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of you shall be called the Son of God.

There is no sexual connotation in Mary's conception. The human DNA Jesus took upon Himself had already been there since Adam was made - having been created by Christ, who is at the right hand of God, a.k.a the Word of God.

Why add a sexual connotation to scripture that isn't in scripture?
 
Last edited:

Grailhunter

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2019
14,583
6,262
113
69
FARMINGTON
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Hebrews 2
16 For verily he (Jesus) took not on him [G1949 epilambanomai] the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

G1949 epilambanomai
middle voice from 1909 and 2983; to seize (for help, injury, attainment, or any other purpose; literally or figuratively):--catch, lay hold (up-)on, take (by, hold of, on).
see GREEK for 1909
see GREEK for 2983

Hebrews 2
14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same. -- Hebrews 2:14.

He partook of flesh and blood, taking upon Himself flesh and blood - the DNA of which had already been created by God through Him, who is the Creator of all things.

When any other human woman conceives, the DNA is passed on by both the (human) father and the mother.

John 4
24 God is a spirit, and they who worship Him must worship in spirit and in truth.

Luke 1
35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Spirit shall come upon you, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow you: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of you shall be called the Son of God.

There is no sexual connotation in Mary's conception. The human DNA Jesus took upon Himself had already been there since Adam was made - having been created by Christ, who is at the right hand of God, a.k.a the Word of God.

Why add a sexual connotation to scripture that isn't in scripture?

That is the point all the terms and descriptions of the act of procreation are there in the scriptures.....conscieve....
begot.....pregnant.....delivery......born.....resulting in the Son of God. Nothing to suggest that it was not sexual. In order for it not to be sexual the biblical description of the event would have to be all wrong. And if it was not sexual could Yeshua be the Son of God? In the past Yahweh had "caused" women to be pregnant but they were not the Son of God.

The second point here is why couldn't it be sexual.
Why think that sex is too nasty for Yahweh to be involved?
Was He not Almighty enough?
Why be born of a woman? Why did He need to be the begotten Son of Yahweh?
For those that believe Yeshua was pre-existing, He could have just appeared.
Obviously Yahweh was not concerned about controversy, He impregnated a woman that was betrothed. That is straight up adultery according to the Mosaic Law, even the common law of the time.
And the third point, where did Christians get the belief that sex is dirty, nasty, sinful, and of the devil, because the belief is not biblical.
Part of my ministry is to debunk false beliefs. False beliefs always cause harm. In a male dominate society if sex is sinful and men desire women and have sex with them, women become temptresses of the devil. Good men corrupted by women.
This negative view of sex has twisted so many things including history. The term fornication was invented to suggest that two unmarried people that have sex is a sin....When until the 16th century the sexual union constituted a marriage. No biblical requirement for a marriage ceremony. Even to day, in most places if a couple do not have sex after a wedding ceremony, they can get the marriage annulled. Because the sexual union constitutes a marriage. And of course the obvious, Mankind would not exist without sex.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.