Hello again, Josho,
As believers we have the choice to lean to our own understanding or to trust in God in this situation.
Whatever believers think of the policies being developed to control what is perceived to be 'global warming' (and there is a lot of evidence that it is warming: the ice caps melting and the seas rising etc.,), at least action is being taken to preserve and protect those who will suffer most, at the loss of their land, through either flood or drought, and thought is being given to what can be done to help those who seek a place of safety in these coming days.
Fashion designers and other professions are seeking ways to operate in a more globally friendly manner: with the use of dyeing processes and so on, which will not harm the land and pollute the rivers. All of these innovations are well worth pursuing. Anything that will rid the world of pollution and help preserve marine life,in it's many forms.
Thank you
In Christ Jesus
Chris
Sorry, there’s no such thing as anthropogenic global warming, sea levels are not rising, polar ice is not melting enough to make any difference, and our emissions of CO2 are not the cause of the natural cycles of warning and cooling, which is caused by sun cycles of solar minimums and maximums.
When investigating the claim of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming, the empirical evidence completely falsifies the claim that mankind’s CO2 emissions are responsible.
Global warming is real - it’s a real cycle of warming and cooling that has occurred at least 24 times in the Eemian period.
In the movie by the politician Al Gore that began the global warming propaganda, he made the correct claim that there’s a correlation between CO2 levels and change of the earth’s temperature - but he failed to inform us that the correlation is backwards.
The temperature increases first, followed by a proven lag time of 200 years in increase of CO2 levels.
That temperature increase causes change in carbon dioxide levels, and not vice-versa, completely falsifies the claim that CO2 increase drives temperature increase.
A great example of the 200 year lag in temperature change and CO2 levels, is found in the time period between 1940 and 1975, when CO2 levels increased steadily for 35 years, at the same time temperature levels were steadily decreasing.
But we’re not supposed to know that fact, as it’s an inconvenient truth, to take a line from Al Gore’s propaganda movie.
Then there’s the fact that the Medieval Warm period and the Holocene maximum period are two time periods when the earth’s temperature was - not just slightly - but markedly warmer for long periods of time, yet with no catastrophic flooding whatsoever from rising ocean levels due to melting polar ice.
During the Holocene maximum, the temperature of the earth was four degrees warmer than today for 3,000 years - far exceeding the global alarmist predicted warming of today, that they so frantically want to stop from happening.
And the final nail in the coffin of anthropogenic catastrophic global warming is the time period when CO2 levels were an astounding TEN TIMES higher than today, yet without the earth burning up in flames, followed by a deluge of global flooding, as the alarmists claim is imminent due to a (much less) predicted increase in temperature, from a much lower level of carbon dioxide levels than existed in the past.
We’ve all seen the graph that shows temperature regularly increasing on an upward slope from the time of the industrial revolution - but what they deliberately do not show is that the graph shows the same rate of temperature rise, on the same slope, for over a century before the beginning of the industrial revolution.
They don’t want us to see that portion of the graph. I wonder why? Hmmm...
The earth was coming out of a mini ice age, and that was why temperature was steadily increasing then - and not because we started emitting carbon dioxide during the industrial revolution.
These facts so thoroughly falsify man-caused global warming, (at a catastrophic level, or at any level), that no amount of spin and scientific double-speak jargon about feedback loops - or anything else - that magically causes our CO2 emissions to raise the earth’s temperature, despite the fact it always lags behind increase in temperature, is bogus.
The incontrovertible empirical evidence is that it doesn’t cause global warming.
What causes the natural cycles of global warming and cooling that ice core data show has been ongoing for the 160,000 years that have been analyzed?
The sun.
Sun cycles of higher and lower output during solar maximums and minimums causes corresponding change in the earth’s temperature, with a 200 year lag.
The oceans, which are very big and very deep, increase their CO2 output when increased sun output warms them.
Because of that lag, pointing out that the sun is currently in a solar minimum yet temperature is increasing, is irrelevant - because it’s what the sun’s output was 2 centuries ago, that affects the rise or fall of the temperature today.
That the sun’s increased output during solar maximums is what increases planet temperature explains why Mars has polar ice melting concurrent with earth polar ice melting.
Why does this conservative reject the “science” of anthropogenic global warming?
Because it’s fake science.
