I believe one who deliberately sins in not a Christian.

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Dodo_David

Melmacian in human guise
Jul 13, 2013
1,048
63
0
ScottAU,

We cannot be inwardly pure on our own power.

Besides, the outward flesh can still do impure things while a person's spirit strives to be pure.

The Apostle Paul describes this fact in Romans 7, in which Paul talks about the impure acts of his flesh taking place despite what his spirit wanted, and the impure acts of his flesh were occurring after Paul had become an Apostle.
 

ScottAU

New Member
Feb 27, 2013
209
25
0
Dodo_David said:
ScottAU,

We cannot be inwardly pure on our own power.

Besides, the outward flesh can still do impure things while a person's spirit strives to be pure.

The Apostle Paul describes this fact in Romans 7, in which Paul talks about the impure acts of his flesh taking place despite what his spirit wanted, and the impure acts of his flesh were occurring after Paul had become an Apostle.
Did I ever claim that we can be inwardly pure of our own power? If I didn't state that then why do you bring it up?




The outward flesh can still do impure things while a persons spirit strives to be pure? What does that mean? Are you saying that a Christian can engage in fornication whilst their sprit strives to be pure? What kind of impure things do you mean?



The example Paul gives in Romans 7 is a man who is carnal and sold under sin. Do you really believe that the salvation of God leaves you in a carnal state still sold under sin? That is quite astounding.

Is it really true that Christian's are filthy wretches only striving to be pure but constantly fail? What kind of Gospel is that?

The Jesus I believe in sets people free indeed.


Joh 8:34 Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.
Joh 8:35 And the servant abideth not in the house for ever: but the Son abideth ever.
Joh 8:36 If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.

Free indeed from what?

Rom 6:1 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
Rom 6:2 God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
Rom 6:3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
Rom 6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Rom 6:5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
Rom 6:6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
Rom 6:7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.
 

Tropical Islander

New Member
Dec 20, 2013
128
5
0
"We cannot be inwardly pure on our own power."

True that. And nobody suggested that we could.

Being born again by the Holy Spirit in the new life of the new covenant means we are the people that received a supernatural heart transplant, according to Ezekiel 36:26

A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you

- and also:

Hebrews 10:16 This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;

then we are inwardly heart pure - by His power. His gift of a new heart in us. THEN we are actually in the new covenant.


Maybe this will not make any sense to someone until you reproduce the basic concept of it for yourself in a minimalistic practical example, just for the general idea what this would mean.

Let's say you are the creator of a new PC operating system and want to replace the old with a better one. Which is able to use your latest software programs. So you install the new SYS in your old PC. Now, booting up your PC and checking what's in there right now, how will the PC respond to a "what is" status check?

Will it respond to the previous installation as the current status? Of course not. It shows what you, the creator of the system installed there in the latest & current installation. You put it in there, it will respond back according to that like in a mirror reflection. So now your New instruction set, or your laws, are in his "mind and heart". It's there, undeniably, it's the new internal reality, and there is no other.

The difference to us is, we have a free will and a soul with consciousness, mind, feelings etc. So we can mess things up and have no problem to corrupt our own thinking, whenever SELF takes over, controlled by anything other than the new heart and Spirit. That is why Paul said "examine yourself" to find out were we are exactly. 2 Cor 13:5



And that is the easy part of it, Scotts 3 questions are much harder to answer:

"Why do Christian's have a problem with heart purity?"
-> there is a possibility that the old heart is still in operation. Check the data output of the mouth, is it referring to the old operating system quite regularly? Well, then the purity isn't there, since the source doesn't provide it. That current heart will refer to it as an utopia that cannot be achieved with the current instruction set. What of course is true.

"Why do Christian's constantly defend ongoing sin in salvation?"
-> no cross Of Christ applied yet, the body is not put to death Ro 8:10, the mind is still controlled by the body, not the spirit. The Holy Spirit is surpressed. Faith is missing, the compromise with sin is the status quo that rules. Grace will remain persistant "until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled - Luke 21:24"

"Why do Christian's constantly deny the plain words of Jesus Christ?"
-> there is a possibility of another Jesus, that does not allow the words of Jesus Christ to enter the mind. High probability of deception, possibly delusion. Rationalisation applied with doctrines of error to cover it and bring false peace & safety to the conscience. Very difficult to reverse, the call of grace will be dramatic in order to wake up the sleeper. It is what is often referred to as "coming to the end of oneself" by acknowledging total defeat under very difficult life circumstances.
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
ScottAU,

Remember, you will be measured according to the standard you use. I have not, and am not excusing any sin. I am saying that God forgives deliberate sin. You can continue to try to make your case by making me say things I have not said and inserting conclusions that are extreme or ridiculous, but I find it to be a poor means of discussing the matter and quite unchristian. Id be happy to answer questions that are sincere, but I will not defend claims you are asserting about me that I never said. It's clear you are trying to win an argument and have everyone pigeon-holed as to what they think and believe. So there is very little reason for me to write to you since you seem to believe you already know everything I think.
 

ScottAU

New Member
Feb 27, 2013
209
25
0
Wormwood said:
ScottAU,

Remember, you will be measured according to the standard you use. I have not, and am not excusing any sin. I am saying that God forgives deliberate sin. You can continue to try to make your case by making me say things I have not said and inserting conclusions that are extreme or ridiculous, but I find it to be a poor means of discussing the matter and quite unchristian. Id be happy to answer questions that are sincere, but I will not defend claims you are asserting about me that I never said. It's clear you are trying to win an argument and have everyone pigeon-holed as to what they think and believe. So there is very little reason for me to write to you since you seem to believe you already know everything I think.
Wormwood,

I have never made the claim that God does not forgive deliberate sin. The forgiveness of deliberate sin is not the issue here.

The issue is in regards to engaging in deliberate sin and remaining justified. The issue is in being in rebellion to God and yet remaining in a reconciled relationship with God free of condemnation. The issue is being able to sin and not surely dying.



My original post in this thread was addressing the issue of "an allowance for willful rebellion whilst one remains in a reconciled state with God." My assertion was that such a belief is not so.

http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/19467-i-believe-one-who-deliberately-sins-in-not-a-christian/page-4#entry216369


I then responded to this statement of williemac...

A minor example is the problem of smoking. I can verify that the majority of long time smokers wish that they didn't smoke. Many sins are very addictive and many people struggle with them, even after having been saved and filled with the Spirit. . The last thing they need is to be nailed by the law. The strength of sin is the law. It is the love (goodness) of God that leads us to repentance.

If a person cannot offer comfort, but merely condemnation, to a struggling brother, then I suggest he steps aside and let God do His work.
The above statement was presented within the context of the Romans 7 wretch and Christian's in an ongoing state of deliberate sin.

http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/19467-i-believe-one-who-deliberately-sins-in-not-a-christian/page-4#entry216370


My assertion was basically that...

This notion of a "struggling brother" whom is still addicted to various sins is a false teaching. Any individual who has been saved from sin is no longer addicted to their sins, the addiction has been broken through a death and resurrection. The power of God is to walk in victory as opposed to walking in constant defeat.
http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/19467-i-believe-one-who-deliberately-sins-in-not-a-christian/page-4#entry216379

Williemac responded to my post by alluding to salvation as an abstract package which is disconnected from actual conduct. He spoke of Jesus basically doing it all within the context of the "sin penalty being paid in full." Williemac also brought forth Romans 10:9-10 as a proof text claiming that all one had to do to be saved was "accept the free gift" and "believe in Jesus." His context clearly separated belief from "abiding/submission/obedience" to the Spirit.

http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/19467-i-believe-one-who-deliberately-sins-in-not-a-christian/page-4#entry216394

I then responded explaining how faith is an active dynamic which produces purity (ie. true righteousness) due to an individual being in submission to the Spirit of God. Thus faith and doing are intrinsically connected. Salvation is not a "package" which people "accept as a free gift" and still remain "enslaved to the service of sin."

http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/19467-i-believe-one-who-deliberately-sins-in-not-a-christian/page-4#entry216443


The bottom line of my point being...

This notion of a "struggling brother" whom is still addicted to various sins is a false teaching. Any individual who has been saved from sin is no longer addicted to their sins, the addiction has been broken through a death and resurrection. The power of God is to walk in victory as opposed to walking in constant defeat. There are so many who have a "form of godliness" but deny the true power of God to set them free from sin. An entire theological system has been invented which teaches that salvation and an impure heart can exist together when the Bible is very clear that no-one can serve two masters.

Wormwood, your first comment in this thread was this...

It seems to me that pretty much every sin is deliberate.
http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/19467-i-believe-one-who-deliberately-sins-in-not-a-christian/page-5#entry216854

My direct response was that this assertion is incorrect and I used the Bible to prove it...

http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/19467-i-believe-one-who-deliberately-sins-in-not-a-christian/page-5#entry216866

Paul, John and the writer of Hebrews would not use language which differentiates between "willful sin" and "non-willful sin" if there was no such thing. The issue is "rebellion" versus "heart purity."


Instead of addressing anything in my post you made a succinct post stating...

"There are no true Christians 'struggling with sin.'" I think this is a tremendous error. Peter had to be rebuked by Paul for being led astray by Judiazers. John Mark turned back and abandoned Paul's mission such that Paul wanted nothing to do with him anymore (but later called him a true servant of Jesus). Jesus warned the churches who were struggling with sin in Revelation to repent. Paul warned the Galatians who were abandoning the Gospel to repent. Paul warned the Corinthians who were divisive, having lawsuits amongst themselves and even getting drunk at the Lord's supper. In one case, a man was sleeping with his mother-in-law and later, after repenting the church was commanded by Paul to welcome him back. If these are not deliberate sins and sins that can be forgiven, then the entire NT should be thrown out because almost all of it is written as a means of correcting Christians who were struggling with various sins. Of course grace is not license to sin, but neither is it a one time event. You are in great error.
http://www.christianityboard.com/topic/19467-i-believe-one-who-deliberately-sins-in-not-a-christian/page-5#entry216881

Your response was a very subtle twist to my assertions. My basic assertion is that "one cannot be engaged in rebellion to God and remain in a justified state at the same time." In other words I assert that the "blood is a cleanser of sin, not a cloak for ongoing sin."

Thus in my view the rebellion ceases once and for all and whilst a Christian may miss the mark due to ignorance it is never to be due to rebellion. The rebellion must cease otherwise one remains in a state of condemnation. In other words you cannot sin and not surely die. Sure God is merciful to sinners but God will not forgive a sinner whilst they persist in their rebellion. The rebellion has to stop BEFORE forgiveness is granted.

Your reponse is not really related to my assertions because you are basically refuting me by claiming that God forgives sin. The issue is not God forgiving sin (we agree) but rather "God forgiving sin BEFORE that sin is foraken through repentance." That is the issue.

I claim that a genuine Christian cannot be struggling with "pornography," "murder," "stealing" etc. Those things stop. Sure the temptation may be there but the submission to the temptation has ceased.


Do you really disagree with my assertions? If not then why try and refute me then? I have been very clear that the sin I am speaking of is in regards to rebellion as opposed to ignorant mistakes. Yet it seems you want to put all sin in the once bucket and make no distincition (just like your first post).


What is it that you specifically disagree with Wormwood? If you are in disagreement that the deliberate sin must stop BEFORE forgiveness is granted then the only conclusion I can draw is that you believe you can continue in deliberate sin and remain forgiven. Thus a serial murderer or child molester could be saved and still murder and molest children from time to time. This is only logical.




So my basic question to you is does the deliberate sin have to stop? Your answer to that question should clarify your position.



The common position in modern theology is that Christian's are wretches whom are still carnal and sold under sin. Thus the struggling porn addict, for example, can be saved at the very same time they are still enslaved. This error has to be refuted because it assures people they are saved and forgiven when they are not. The Bible is so very clear that forgiveness is not granted until the rebellion is forsaken.
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
ScottAU,

Thanks for your thorough response. I don't have time to deal with the bulk of it, but I wanted to quickly say that you did qualify sin that was non-rebellious as basically that which is done due to ignorance or accident. I'll pull up the quote later if you like. My argument was that the Bible is full of corrections for Christians whose sin would go beyond how you define non-rebellious sin. Clearly their sins were willful and intentional. One does not sleep with their mother-in-law by accident, and Paul says not only should they know better but even pagans know its wrong!

Okay, I have a minute here. Briefly, in answer to your question (thank you, by the way), yes. I believe a person who is living in sin should do so no longer. To continue in sin, especially after someone knows a behavior is inconsistent with a life of faith, is to put oneself in significant peril. While I believe there is forgiveness for one who backslides, I also believe someone can lose their salvation. Sin hardens the heart and continual, unrepentant sin can callous a person such that they walk away from the faith. This is my perspective on the matter. I'd be happy to provide more detail and scripture references that I think validate my position later when I have more time if you like.

In many ways I agree with you. However, I think it is clear that even Christians can get tangled in sin (Heb. 12:1-4). God's forgiveness for deliberate, willful sin is not a one shot deal in my mind. Sin is no joke and grace is not license. I am not an antinomianist, but neither do I believe that certain sins are only forgiven once.
 

Dodo_David

Melmacian in human guise
Jul 13, 2013
1,048
63
0
ScottAU said:
The example Paul gives in Romans 7 is a man who is carnal and sold under sin. Do you really believe that the salvation of God leaves you in a carnal state still sold under sin? That is quite astounding.
In Romans 7, the Apostle Paul is describing himself as he was as an Apostle.

In Romans 7:25 (ESV) Paul writes, "So then, I myself serve the law of God with my mind, but with my flesh I serve the law of sin."

In that verse, Paul is speaking in the present tense.
 

Tropical Islander

New Member
Dec 20, 2013
128
5
0
Romans 7:25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

that's the status report of "how things are" and also the last verse of Rom 7. Now we come to Rom 8 where the "yielding" part starts. So you want to stay in Rom 7 without hearing how to solve it?

And Rom 8 is nothing new, it's already introduced earlier,

Romans 6:13 Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.

Romans 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
 

ScottAU

New Member
Feb 27, 2013
209
25
0
Dodo_David said:
In Romans 7, the Apostle Paul is describing himself as he was as an Apostle.

In Romans 7:25 (ESV) Paul writes, "So then, I myself serve the law of God with my mind, but with my flesh I serve the law of sin."

In that verse, Paul is speaking in the present tense.
In Romans 7 Paul is using a grammatical device known as "historical present." He is doing this put emphasis on the point that the law cannot save, rather salvation is through the Spirit.

To teach that Paul is speaking of himself in the present as being a carnal wretch whom is still sold under sin and therefore cannot stop sinning is to put Paul at odds with his own words throughout his writings. Romans chapter 6 specifically speaks of being set free from the service of sin and Romans 8 specifically speaks of overcoming sin.

Romans 7 opens with...

Rom 7:1 Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?

Paul is speaking in the context of the law. He goes on...

Rom 7:6 But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.

The change from the Old Covenant to the New Covenant is one of the Spirit. We serve God in the Spirit as opposed to serving mere rules and regulations.

It was the rules and regulations which brought the knowledge of right conduct and it was through this knowledge that a human being can "choose" evil and hence "die to God." This is how sin kills through the law.

Rom 7:8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.
Rom 7:9 For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.
Rom 7:10 And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.
Rom 7:11 For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.

Now while the law was ordained to life instead brings death. Paul is defending the law from being perceived as evil because it brought death. The law didn't bring death, it was rebellion which brought death but rebellion can only exist through knowledge and the law brings knowledge.

Now Paul goes on from this defence of the law into to discuss the wretched men. It is the same man that died in verse 9...

Rom 7:12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
Rom 7:13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
Rom 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

Paul is speaking of the sinner who has rebelled against God and has therefore sold themselves into slavery to sin. The sinner is in total bondage.

Rom 7:15 For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
Rom 7:16 If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.
Rom 7:17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Rom 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
Rom 7:19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.
Rom 7:20 Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
Rom 7:21 I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.
Rom 7:22 For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:
Rom 7:23 But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.
Rom 7:24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

The above description is not that of a Christian who has been delivered from sin. It is a description of a sinner who is addicted to the lust of the flesh and lacks the spiritual life to do the right thing. The wretched man is a dead man.

The wretched man is plagued by the guilt of conscience for he has the law of God written on his heart and thus his conscience accuses him of his wrongdoing (see Rom 2:15). This wretched man is crying out for deliverance. This wretched man is crying out to be set free from this state of bondage. To claim that this wretched man is "saved" is to make a mockery of the salvation of God.

Paul goes on...

Rom 7:25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

Paul then thanks God through Jesus Christ and states that with the mind he serves the law of God but with the flesh he serves the law of sin. Yet it does not stop there for Paul then speaks of the solution to the dilemma of the wretched man whom the law cannot save...

Rom 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Rom 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
Rom 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
Rom 8:4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

There is no condemnation to those who are IN Christ Jesus who no longer walk after the flesh but instead walk after the Spirit.

Those who abide in Christ have CRUCIFIED THE FLESH and thus the "flesh that serves sin" is DEAD.
Rom 6:6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
Rom 6:7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.

The body of sin (the body that serves sin) has to be destroyed once and for all and this occurs through dying with Christ. This is how the wretched man is set free. Thus we are set free by the SPIRIT OF LIFE IN JESUS CHRIST. What are we set free from? We are set free from the law of sin and death which is simply that "you sin you die." By no longer serving sin we no longer die and thus we are ALIVE TO GOD.

This is not something the law could do because the law can only regulate the outer conduct of a man and not the heart. The Spirit of life in Jesus Christ on the other hand regulates the inner man whereby the righteousness of the law is fulfilled in us. Jesus condemned sin in his flesh by overcoming it through the Spirit and He did this as an example for us to follow that we too can condemn sin in the flesh by overcoming it through the Spirit and therefore have the righteousness of the law fulfilled in us.

Read Romans 8:1-4 again as I am not making this up, this is what Paul is teaching here, clear as day...

Rom 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Rom 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
Rom 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
Rom 8:4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.


Satan does not want people to experience this which is why the "crucifixion of the flesh" has been completely omitted from the Gospel in the modern church system and it doesn't really matter what denomination you pick. The apostasy and deception is massive.

Look at what Peter wrote...

1Pe 4:1 Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh, arm yourselves likewise with the same mind: for he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin;
1Pe 4:2 That he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men, but to the will of God.

Does verse 2 apply to a man who is still a wretch? A man who is carnal and sold under sin?

Look at this passage from Romans 6...

om 6:8 Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:
Rom 6:9 Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.
Rom 6:10 For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God.
Rom 6:11 Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Rom 6:12 Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof.
Rom 6:13 Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.

Let not sin reign in your mortal body? How does that fit in with the wretched man who cannot do anything but let sin reign in his mortal body.

See how perverted the modern Gospel has become? These wolves in the pulpits brainwash their congregations with their lies about the context of Romans 7, Isa 64:6 Psalm 51:5, 1Joh 1:8 and many other passages.

Strip all the fluff from their rhetoric and they are teaching "you can sin and not surely die" and they utterly deny "heart purity in salvation." They preach this total perversion of salvation which leaves people carnal wretches.

I wish people would wake up because this dark doctrine has enveloped the planet and there are very few people contending against it.
 

williemac

New Member
Apr 29, 2012
1,094
65
0
Canada
Tropical Islander said:
Romans 7:25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

that's the status report of "how things are" and also the last verse of Rom 7. Now we come to Rom 8 where the "yielding" part starts. So you want to stay in Rom 7 without hearing how to solve it?

And Rom 8 is nothing new, it's already introduced earlier,

Romans 6:13 Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.
Romans 6:16 Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Only one problem with this summary. It completely ignores the word "therefore" in 8:1. Chapter 8 is not meant to show how to solve ch.7. There is nothing in ch.7 to solve. Paul just got through revealing that because of his mindset, any sin in his life is not attributed to him.

As well, Rom. 8 is not the same as Rom.6. In ch.6, he is giving instructions on behavior and reasoning for it. In Rom.8, he is revealing the working of our freedom from condemnation, which is a mindset, as revealed in the previous chapter and confirmed in 8:5. He goes on to say that the carnal mind is enmity against God because it is not subject to the law of God. But again, this is a reflection of the mindset he was referring to in the previous chapter. The subjection to the law of God is a mental agreement with it. It is an agreement in principle..A MINDSET.

Then in 8:6, he states that those who are in the flesh cannot please God. But before we draw conclusions, we need to see the "but" in the next sentence..." but you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit IF INDEED THE SPIRIT OF GOD DWELLS IN YOU". All that is required to be in the Spirit is to have the Spirit.

The truth is that anyone who comes to God for salvation, comes to Him on the basis of the acknowledgment and confession of sin. This, by default, means that the person is in agreement with the law. The law reveals sin. One does not comes to salvation from sin if he disagrees with the conviction of it. It takes an agreement with the law to be saved.

Therefore, a person who has the Spirit of God obviously is saved, and thus has fulfilled the conditions laid out by Paul concerning the freedom from condemnation....agreement with the law, and the indwelling of the Spirit.

Our call to walk a Godly life is not the way that we get ourselves saved or keep ourselves saved. The Galatians learned that through the rebuke that they received. Have we not learned from it at all?
 

ScottAU

New Member
Feb 27, 2013
209
25
0
Wormwood said:
ScottAU,

Thanks for your thorough response. I don't have time to deal with the bulk of it, but I wanted to quickly say that you did qualify sin that was non-rebellious as basically that which is done due to ignorance or accident. I'll pull up the quote later if you like. My argument was that the Bible is full of corrections for Christians whose sin would go beyond how you define non-rebellious sin. Clearly their sins were willful and intentional. One does not sleep with their mother-in-law by accident Of course they don't, but do you believe this man was "saved" while he was actively engaged in this filthy behaviour?, and Paul says not only should they know better but even pagans know its wrong!

Okay, I have a minute here. Briefly, in answer to your question (thank you, by the way), yes. I believe a person who is living in sin should do so no longer. To continue in sin, especially after someone knows a behavior is inconsistent with a life of faith, is to put oneself in significant peril. While I believe there is forgiveness for one who backslides, I also believe someone can lose their salvation. When? When is it lost? The instant one rebels or some time later? Does this imply a revolving door of sin/repent/sinrepent ----- saved/lost/saved/lost.... I would really be interested how you perceive this "loss of salvation." What actually is salvation? All pertinant questions. Sin hardens the heart and continual, unrepentant sin can callous a person such that they walk away from the faith. So the walking away from the faith occurs after a period of time of being engaged in rebellion? So one can be saved and in rebellion at the same time? Doesn't this imply that salvation is purely an abstract position set apart from the actual condition of the heart? This is my perspective on the matter. I'd be happy to provide more detail and scripture references that I think validate my position later when I have more time if you like. Please do so.

In many ways I agree with you. However, I think it is clear that even Christians can get tangled in sin (Heb. 12:1-4). God's forgiveness for deliberate, willful sin is not a one shot deal in my mind. Sin is no joke and grace is not license. I am not an antinomianist, but neither do I believe that certain sins are only forgiven once.
Where does heart purity fit into your doctrine?

williemac said:
Only one problem with this summary. It completely ignores the word "therefore" in 8:1. Chapter 8 is not meant to show how to solve ch.7. There is nothing in ch.7 to solve. Paul just got through revealing that because of his mindset, any sin in his life is not attributed to him.

As well, Rom. 8 is not the same as Rom.6. In ch.6, he is giving instructions on behavior and reasoning for it. In Rom.8, he is revealing the working of our freedom from condemnation, which is a mindset, as revealed in the previous chapter and confirmed in 8:5. He goes on to say that the carnal mind is enmity against God because it is not subject to the law of God. But again, this is a reflection of the mindset he was referring to in the previous chapter. The subjection to the law of God is a mental agreement with it. It is an agreement in principle..A MINDSET.

Then in 8:6, he states that those who are in the flesh cannot please God. But before we draw conclusions, we need to see the "but" in the next sentence..." but you are not in the flesh but in the Spirit IF INDEED THE SPIRIT OF GOD DWELLS IN YOU". All that is required to be in the Spirit is to have the Spirit.

The truth is that anyone who comes to God for salvation, comes to Him on the basis of the acknowledgment and confession of sin. This, by default, means that the person is in agreement with the law. The law reveals sin. One does not comes to salvation from sin if he disagrees with the conviction of it. It takes an agreement with the law to be saved.

Therefore, a person who has the Spirit of God obviously is saved, and thus has fulfilled the conditions laid out by Paul concerning the freedom from condemnation....agreement with the law, and the indwelling of the Spirit.

Our call to walk a Godly life is not the way that we get ourselves saved or keep ourselves saved. The Galatians learned that through the rebuke that they received. Have we not learned from it at all?
Saved from what?

Certainly not sin because your notion of salvation still has "saved sinners in bondage."

Your salvation only appears to be "saved from judgement."



Your doctrine would clearly support a pedophile confessing their crimes to God but continuing to do them only with a "mindset" that they are spiritual. In fact you boldly claim that "any sin in his life is not attributed to him." What you are saying sounds very similar to gnostic dualism where deeds are disconnected from condition of the soul.
 

Madad21

Boast in Christ
Dec 28, 2013
1,108
39
0
Its not the deliberate sin that distinguishes the Christian, its the deliberate repentance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aspen

aspen

“"The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few
Apr 25, 2012
14,111
4,778
113
53
West Coast
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Madad21 said:
Its not the deliberate sin that distinguishes the Christian, its the deliberate repentance.
Beautifully stated.
 

williemac

New Member
Apr 29, 2012
1,094
65
0
Canada
ScottAU said:
Where does heart purity fit into your doctrine?


Saved from what?

Certainly not sin because your notion of salvation still has "saved sinners in bondage."

Your salvation only appears to be "saved from judgement."
Really. That's all you get from this? This subject has been going on for a long time and much of this has been explained from more than a few new covenant concepts. I would like to know what your notion of salvation from sin actually is. The truth is, any believer at any time has the ability to sin. Therefore, whatever you want to say about salvation from sin, it does not mean that sin is totally removed from the person.

Furthermore, you obviously fully understand that the responsibility to abstain from sin lies upon the believer. How then, does this translate to having been saved from sin, if it isn't first and foremost from the wages of it? We certainly have not been saved from the ability to sin, nor the possibility of sinning. So tell me, how does this mean that we are saved from sin, if it isn't what the bible says, that we are saved from wrath?

I would not minimize, if I were you, the relevancy of having been saved from judgment. Where do you think our emotional strength comes from to live a godly life? From threats and warnings of rejection and judgment, or the assurance of His love and acceptance?

I don't know where people get off thinking that they can climb into the mind of a man who is addicted to a perverted desire, and judge that man as though he is merely deviously taking advantage of a good thing (God's grace). That kind of assumption about another man is in itself a perversion. Would you be willing to come along side of such a person and assist them in overcoming their bondage? Or are you just going to stay your distance and turn your nose up at them as though they like what they are, enjoy what they are doing with no remorse or no longing to be rid of the burden on their souls? What has this person been saved from, that you think they should still be judged? If they had been saved from sin as you understand it, then why are they still in bondage? The day you can answer that without judging another brother in the process is the day I will be all ears. I have news for you. The accuser of the brethren is not another believer.
ScottAU said:
Your doctrine would clearly support a pedophile confessing their crimes to God but continuing to do them only with a "mindset" that they are spiritual. In fact you boldly claim that "any sin in his life is not attributed to him." What you are saying sounds very similar to gnostic dualism where deeds are disconnected from condition of the soul.
My doctrine? Be that as it may, as far as this label of "gnostic dualism" is concerned, I don't really care what someone else has done with Rom.7. My interpretation is that a person's sin can indeed be disconnected in a sense. This is exactly what Paul stated in two places...."it is not I who sin, but sin in me". I didn't say this. I didn't invent this idea. Your issue is with Paul and of course, the Holy Spirit, not with me.

As far as some people's excuse for Rom.7...It cannot be some state Paul was in 'before' salvation. If it was, there would have been no need to be saved, as he was presenting a concept where he was not being held responsible for any sin that he might be doing.

That may bother some people, but there's nothing I can do about that. We are a work in progress. What He began in us, He said it is HE who would finish. YOUR doctrine appears to reduce the finishing of the work to OUR responsibility and OUR accomplishment. Who gets the glory for that? Certainly not God.
 

Dodo_David

Melmacian in human guise
Jul 13, 2013
1,048
63
0
A person being spiritually saved doesn't make the person's flesh unable to sin anymore.
As williemac said, "We certainly have not been saved from the ability to sin, nor the possibility of sinning."

Yes, the Apostle Paul contrasts the carnal mindset with the spiritual mindset.

The carnal mindset doesn't care if sin occurs.
The spiritual mindset is sensitive to the presence of sin and repents when sin is discovered.
The spiritual mindset has an awareness of sin that drives it to the foot of the Cross, to having a constant awareness of a need for the Savior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: williemac

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
ScottAU,

One does not sleep with their mother-in-law by accident Of course they don't, but do you believe this man was "saved" while he was actively engaged in this filthy behaviour?, and Paul says not only should they know better but even pagans know its wrong!
Let me ask you, if someone intentionally lies while they are a believer, are they no longer "saved" due to their filthy behavior? I mean, God doesn't save liars right? Where do we draw the lines here and who draws them? If, due to peer pressure, depression and maybe some other circumstances in their life, a person goes out and gets drunk and winds up engaging in terrible activities (fighting, sexual immorality, etc.) are you saying that person is now eternally condemned if they were "saved"? Or, are you suggesting a "saved" person could never have such a moment of weakness. I think if you argue the first point, then you drastically misunderstand God's grace and the current battle we have between us and our flesh. Someone with the Spirit of Christ does not cease to wrestle with the flesh, and they are not always victorious in that wrestling (else it really wouldn't be wrestling would it?). If you argue the second point, then I think your perspective is very different than what is clearly portrayed in the early church. Paul speaks to the Corinthians as "set apart in Christ" even though they were wrestling with a host of sins.

While I believe there is forgiveness for one who backslides, I also believe someone can lose their salvation. When? When is it lost? The instant one rebels or some time later? Does this imply a revolving door of sin/repent/sinrepent ----- saved/lost/saved/lost.... I would really be interested how you perceive this "loss of salvation." What actually is salvation? All pertinant questions.
A person is not "lost" because they sin too much. A person is lost because they are without faith and separated from Christ. The power of Christ's blood can cover even the most vile of sins. However, sin hardens the heart and can cause a person to stop believing (and often is the fruit of unbelief). I see it as a downward cycle. A person, due to weak faith can sin. If they continue in that sin, they can become calloused and hardened. Through that hardening they can drift from the truth and eventually give up the faith. When a person has done this, they are incapable of repentance, as God will not allow Christ to be crucified all over again. Someone who claims to "believe" but lives in perpetual, unrepentant sin can not be said to be someone who lives by faith (unless they are totally ignorant that their sin is sin...and they need instruction on the matter). Of course, it is not for us to make judgments about when a person has ceased to believe due to their sin, but it is clear to me that Scripture warns that sin, false teaching, and legalism are all means by which a person can drift from the faith and put themselves in true eternal danger.


Sin hardens the heart and continual, unrepentant sin can callous a person such that they walk away from the faith. So the walking away from the faith occurs after a period of time of being engaged in rebellion? So one can be saved and in rebellion at the same time? Doesn't this imply that salvation is purely an abstract position set apart from the actual condition of the heart?
No, salvation is not abstract and it is also not without fruit. However, it seems to me that you so aligned salvation with good works that the two become indistinguishable in all practical senses. This is a dangerous road to travel. If my salvation is only proven through complete, unwavering obedience and a life free from knowing, intentional sin, then ultimately this becomes a situation where I must show that I am truly saved by my own goodness. Although the claim is still made that salvation is by grace, the maintaining of that salvation is then validated through ones personal holiness and obedience to law. This is a heresy known as Galatianism and is precisely what Paul was angry about with the Galatian churches. They had received their salvation by grace but now where trying to maintain it through works of the law. Paul said they were falling from grace when they did this. Whether the law you turn to is circumcision or a life of complete moral integrity, the common denominator is the same - salvation gained by grace but maintained by personal effort. Saying the Holy Spirit empowers the personal effort is still pointless because maintaining salvation ultimately boils down not to the cross, but to personal actions.

Im out of time now. Ill try to dive into Scripture and my understanding of it later tonight.

This is my perspective on the matter. I'd be happy to provide more detail and scripture references that I think validate my position later when I have more time if you like. Please do so.
 

Wormwood

Chaps
Apr 9, 2013
2,346
332
83
47
California
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
2 Cor. 13:5-9 - Paul links faith with obedience. However, here he makes it clear that his desire is that they move toward perfection. He does not assume perfection because they are in the faith, but wants them to evaluate their faith by their ongoing effort to live sanctified lives. Faith is the key here, not freedom from sin.

Romans 3:21-31 - Paul shows that we are saved by faith, not works of the law. He does not, however, say that after one is "saved" that they are then obliged to obedience to the law. The law does not bring salvation, faith does. Paul shows though that "this faith" we have in Christ causes us to uphold the law through. So, the point here is that a person is saved by faith, not obedience. Our faith does make us obedient people, but it is faith that is the crux of the matter, not perfect obedience.

Romans 6:11-14 - A key series of verses that show that we are saved by faith to live a new life in Christ. Paul encourages the Romans to not let sin "reign" in their bodies. This clearly shows that 1) Paul rejects the false teaching that faith gives people freedom to live lawlessly but 2) that this does not mean we cease to find salvation by faith. A true understanding of the faith brings one to desire to serve Christ rather than sin. This does NOT mean a person will not sin nor that some are not allowing sin to "reign" in their bodies presently. However, God's grace empowers a person to throw off the sin. Striving to establish righteousness through personal works of holiness and law only empowers sin (see Rom. 7:8). The stronger a person's faith is in God's grace, the more it will be reflected in their lives by their ability to overcome sin. This does NOT mean they will no longer sin. Paul does not say that. He says, "don't let sin reign in your mortal bodies." He does not say, "True Christians cannot or will not have sin reign in their bodies."

Hebrews 6:1-12 - This section of verses show the importance of growing in the faith so that one will not, due to immature faith, end up falling away. The author encourages the believers to mature in the faith so that they will not fall away. Faith is the key issue regarding whether or not someone "falls" not sin. Verse 12 is especially important as it teaches that through "faith and patience" the promises are inherited.

These verses are particularly important so I will just quote them here:
“For who were those who heard and yet rebelled? Was it not all those who left Egypt led by Moses? And with whom was he provoked for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the wilderness? And to whom did he swear that they would not enter his rest, but to those who were disobedient? So we see that they were unable to enter because of unbelief. Therefore, while the promise of entering his rest still stands, let us fear lest any of you should seem to have failed to reach it. For good news came to us just as to them, but the message they heard did not benefit them, because they were not united by faith with those who listened.” (Hebrews 3:16 - 4:1–2, ESV)
Here we see a clear link between unbelief and disobedience. The author puts the emphasis on unbelief here as the reason the Israelites did not enter the promised land and links that to the Christian life. The disobedience was merely a symptom of the disease (unbelief). It was not one act of disobedience that ultimately led to Israel's failure to enter the promised land, but ongoing, perpetual unbelief that resulted in continual disobedience (rebellion against Moses, grumbling about food and water, sexual immorality, refusal to enter the land for fear of the people, etc.). The author does not say, "let us fear lest any of you sin in a rebellious nature." Rather, he emphasizes the faith that resulted in ongoing obedience. Ongoing belief is always the issue that biblical authors point to with regard to falling away or enduring to the end. Sinning is simply not the issue they point toward.

Im out of time.
 

snr5557

Member
Jan 19, 2014
307
2
18
Then it is impossible to be a Christian. If what you say is true, we've all been lying to ourselves. Then everyone should stop going to church, praying etc because it would be pointless. Everyone has sinned, both intentionally and unintentionally. Stop being so judgemental.

Please note I was being sarcastic when I said to stop going to church and praying.
 

horsecamp

New Member
Feb 1, 2008
765
23
0
I have been thinking about this for several days now and I have come up with the answer that every one MUST be satisfied with... unless they just want to be a horses pa tut !

so if your a horses pa tut every one will know it now..


the original statement states--- I believes any one who deliberately sins is not a Christian.


From now every one must deliberately sin in couples or more !!!

no more of this just one person deliberately sinning at a time ..

and I think there is enough people in the world deliberately sinning that its covered .

so people that deliberately sin are still Christians .. and you cant change your statement or your a horses
pa tut.. and deliberately sinning your self so there..

.

this debate is now over and iam declaring my self the winner.once .again