To followerofChrist,(followerofchrist;40881)
Another book of similar type is called the Case for Christ by Lee Strobel
(remagoen)
I did research on Strobel once before a while back. I'm not too sure about his credentials.
Yesterday at on lunch at work, I went back to pick up Mere Christianity again and do some reading when I looked for any of Strobel's works. It had hit me that I had made an ad hominem attack on Strobel by arguing, "because he has bad credentials, he can't possibly have anything noteworthy to say".I was wrong, I apologize.We had only one book of his (Case of a Creator, I think it was, involving ID) and I read the back of the book. Line after line, I read things that scientists have proven time and time again to be wrong. Even flipping through it, I found so many confusions about how science works, how evolutions work, and other outright wrongs. From there alone, I'm not too sure about Strobel once again.Anyway, on to Lewis.Browsing the ToC, I found the section of faith rather interesting, so I thumbed over to it. What I read shocked me and made complete sense, and I think I'll refer other Atheists over to it. Basically, if I don't believe in faith, don't worry about it, just skip over it (though he didn't say don't read anything), and come back at a later time. He said, faith is something that comes naturally, and that I should just let it be.That makes sense. It really does.Seeing how I now had nothing to read, I went over to Sexual Morality, as it is something I'm very passionate about. He gave three examples (the first to of which I thoroughly agree with, the third I couldn't accept [forgot why] but do acknowledge) of comparing sex and food, and I see no reason to change this excellent analogy. I don't remember them exactly from the top of my head but the basics are as follows:Sex and food are both necessary. Food is for sustaining the body with energy, while sex is to further the human race. We wouldn't go around eating everything in sight, so why should we go around and have sex with everything in sight. That makes perfect sense. (Rereading what I just said really does no justice for Lewis said, and I totally encourage anyone reading this to go and read it his or herself.)He fails to cover something interesting, however. Whether that is an actual failure or just a ignorance from the time he was living in (with the lack of recent studies and advances in biology), I don't know. That point he missed is about the health benefits of having sex, including having a healthier immune system, healthier heart, and clearer mind. These right here would be like, keeling with his analogy, taking vitamins. (Again, rereading that, I think that's a bad comparison. If someone finds it weak, please ask me to make it clearer.)Of course, I don't mention this with the idea of supporting rape or orgies; both partners should be consenting, mature individuals.