I hope you know that Romans 7:4 is speaking about The Law.....not good works.
We are dead to the Mosaic Law.
This is quite beside my point in offering the verse, which was to demonstrate that the Bible does give "shoulds" to the Christian, which you said that it didn't. In the case of
Romans 7:4, the "should" is concerning "bearing fruit to God." As Paul wrote, the Christian
should do so.
If the Moral Law is still in effect, we cannot say that a Christian SHOULD obey God.
Why is this difficult to understand??
We do NOT have a choice.
We are REQUIRED to obey God.
When we don't it's a sin, we ask forgiveness, and carry on.
Should means we could choose NOT to obey,,,
sin willfully, and not worry too much because we have a choice.
Now, you may be meaning that God does not FORCE us to obey Him.
IF this is what you mean, then I agree with you.
However, the wording you use is not in keeping with what Jesus taught.
I have no idea why you hold to the thinking that you do in the above quotation. Yes, God's Moral Law is in effect for all, Christian and non-Christian. We all ought to obey it; we should obey it. But Christians
don't obey God's Moral Law, as the NT recounts many times. About this sort of Christian, about the Christian who has not obeyed God, it is correct to say that they
should have obeyed God. And one ought to say this because
God has given the command that they disobeyed. This is not at all a controversial or complex thing to grasp...
When I say that the Christian has a choice about whether or not to obey God, I am not saying that God's Moral Laws are mere suggestions that a Christian can take or leave, as they like. Obviously. I mean only that Christians have free agency that they exercise in every moral or spiritual choice that they face.
In any case, it is doubly peculiar to read your "We do NOT have a choice" statement and then two lines down, read "When we don't, it's a sin, we ask forgiveness, and carry on." Your later statement indicates that a Christian may chose to disobey God and sin in direct contradiction of your earlier statement that they
have no choice but to obey God. Well, which is it? If Christians have no choice about obeying God, then they cannot choose to disobey Him which you say that they
can do.
Nowhere in anything that I've written in this thread do I ever indicate "should obey God" means "sin willfully and not worry too much" about it. This seems to me a good example of how, in this thread, you have tacked things onto what you read, adding to, and "spinning" what you've read to suit your view. In any case, I have, in this thread, repeatedly written that God does not force or compel His children to obey. Why only now are you tentatively acknowledging this? Shall I go through my past posts to you in this thread and quote the times I've said this very thing to you?
As far as my "wording" goes, nothing I've written is out of keeping with Christ's teachings. The only problem you seem to actually have with my posts is the blinding effect of your doctrinal bias and a practice of assuming and/or imagining what other posters you disagree with mean by what they've written.