You are projecting. I'm not the one who is angry. But you seem to be. You are the one throwing insults. You are the one who can't stand to hear the truth about the RCC. Why? Because it's your religion. Religious people affirm dogma, which was not the product of sound argument, which is why dogma isn't defended with rational argument. And because they can't defend their conclusions through rational argument, when the truth is presented to them, they strike out, attacking the man, rather than his arguments.
This must be frustrating to you, especially when you encounter a free-thinker like me. Among Catholics, all you need to do is quote dogma and among your fellow Catholics, that is enough. Why? Dogma isn't the conclusion to a rational argument; dogma is a set of ideas that one must affirm in order to be a member in good standing with the Catholic church. For Catholics, "tradition" answers to the question, "Isn't this what we have always affirmed?" Without tradition and the Catholic dogma that comes with it, one cannot be a Catholic.
The doctrine of Sola Scriptura has jettisoned Catholic dogma altogether, which is a threat to the Catholic religion. For this reason, Catholic Apologists resort to "proof-texting", taking verses out of context, and a bit of equivocation, in an attempt to convince Christians that a rejection of "tradition" is a rejection of God's truth. In fact, a rejection of Catholic dogma means nothing more than freedom from the Catholic religion, which is another form of slavery, bondage, and a system of control.
Yes, I am against Catholicism, which is a wolf in sheep's clothing. I am against all religion, but especially Catholicism because it remains a pagan religion pretending to be Christian. On the other hand, I am not against all those who claim to be Catholics because the Lord has planted many good men and women in those churches where mass is held. Some stay to evangelize the lost, many leave having come to a more complete knowledge of the truth.
I gave you good arguments for what I believe. Since religious people are unaccustomed to evaluating arguments to see whether they are good arguments or those that fail, some of them can't tell the difference between a good argument and a bad one. Perhaps you are out of practice?