KJV The Pure Word of God?

[ByGraceThroughFaith]

What Scriptures did the Gentile world use during the early church?

Did they have to learn Hebrew to know the Scriptures? You're just like a KJVOist. You require others to learn another language to get the "Word of God".....

Lets see your answer to #338

 

[praise_yeshua]

You simply don't understand. IF any of the quotes in the New Testament are from the LXX then either the LXX is equally Inspired like the Hebrew Old Testament or the NT quotes from an UNINSPIRED work

Everyone believes in some form of derivative inspiration. You are too inexperienced to know differently.

In any language, wherein the Truth is expressed properly those "works" can themselves carry with them the same authority of inspired Scriptures.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Lets see your answer to #338

Learning as you go..... Yeah. I noticed that....

 

[ByGraceThroughFaith]

Everyone believes in some form of derivative inspiration. You are too inexperienced to know differently.

In any language, wherein the Truth is expressed properly those "works" can themselves carry with them the same authority of inspired Scriptures.

With your foolish view the New Testament is not ALL the Word of God in the Original but also the words of fallible humans!

 

[praise_yeshua]

You do not know what you are talking about. It is complete RUBBISH

Arrogant Brits...... Always thinking they are the smartest ones in the room.....

So are you a loyal servant to the Crown of England? The "Church" lead by your Queen's choice?

 

[ByGraceThroughFaith]

Learning as you go..... Yeah. I noticed that....

Your view makes the NT NOT the complete Word of God

 

[praise_yeshua]

With your foolish view the New Testament is not ALL the Word of God in the Original but also the words of fallible humans!

Do tell. What might those be?

 

[ByGraceThroughFaith]

Arrogant Brits...... Always thinking they are the smartest ones in the room.....

So are you a loyal servant to the Crown of England? The "Church" lead by your Queen's choice?

I know when you are BEAT!

 

[ByGraceThroughFaith]

Do tell. What might those be?

334

 

[praise_yeshua]

Your view makes the NT NOT the complete Word of God

The NT itself witness to its own "short comings"....

Joh 21:25 And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.

The "Word of God" is not bound by the choices and sins of men.

 

[praise_yeshua]

334

Wrong connection. There are other choices true to the LXX. Look again.

 

[ByGraceThroughFaith]

The NT itself witness to its own "short comings"....

Joh 21:25 And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.

The "Word of God" is not bound by the choices and sins of men.

Do you believe this?

2 Timothy 3:16
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness :

 

[praise_yeshua]

How about Matthew 11:10, and Malachi 3:1?

You are out of your depth here!

How about Matthew 11:10, and Malachi 3:1?

You are out of your depth here!

Just so you know.... and gain a little experience so you don't have to rely upon "Google"...

Isa 40:3 The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the LORD, make straight in the desert a highway for our God.

Is distinctly of Greek origin.

Jerome witnessed the fact that Matthew was originally written in Hebrew and later converted to Greek. As such, this is a mistake in that process.

Do a little research for yourself...

 

[praise_yeshua]

Do you believe this?

2 Timothy 3:16
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness :

Tell you what. You want to debate this verse? I don't want you "running off". Stick around. I'll put forth the effort if you will too????

I'll wait for your response.

Needless to say. Yes. I believe in the inspiration of Scripture. Paul was referencing the LXX canon. Nothing more.

 

[Jim B]

The original Greek has “Jesus”.

You can cry all you want. The KJV translates the Greek correctly.

Original Greek? a) There are no original Bible texts. b) Jesus is an English word.

It's nonsense to say that the KJV translates the Greek correctly. Furthermore, we are discussing the Old Testament, where the Hebrew states "Joshua", not "Jesus". The KJV has it wrong.

Once again, Joshua was the leader who dispossessed the nations. Why are you distorting what God's word clearly says about Israel's history?

 

[ByGraceThroughFaith]

Tell you what. You want to debate this verse? I don't want you "running off". Stick around. I'll put forth the effort if you will too????

I'll wait for your response.

Needless to say. Yes. I believe in the inspiration of Scripture. Paul was referencing the LXX canon. Nothing more.

If ALL Scripture is God Inspired and the New Testament Writers quote from the LXX then the LXX is also Inspired. Is this what you believe?

 

[ByGraceThroughFaith]

Tell you what. You want to debate this verse? I don't want you "running off". Stick around. I'll put forth the effort if you will too????

I'll wait for your response.

Needless to say. Yes. I believe in the inspiration of Scripture. Paul was referencing the LXX canon. Nothing more.

The LXX canon has the apocrypha!

 

[praise_yeshua]

If ALL Scripture is God Inspired and the New Testament Writers quote from the LXX then the LXX is also Inspired. Is this what you believe?

Yes. Like I have said and you ignore. Where any manuscript rightfully expresses the Truth of the originals, then they too can be considered "inspired".

The LXX is superior to the MT. If Jerome would have just listened to Augustine, we wouldn't be having this argument. Jerome had to do things "his own way".....

You don't know this because you are inexperienced with the subject. I encourage you to study it yourself.

 

[ByGraceThroughFaith]

Yes. Like I have said and you ignore. Where any manuscript rightfully expresses the Truth of the originals, then they too can be considered "inspired".

The LXX is superior to the MT. If Jerome would have just listened to Augustine, we would be having this argument. Jerome had to do things "his own way".....

You don't know this because you are inexperienced with the subject. I encourage you to study it yourself.

Your arguments are heresy

 

[praise_yeshua]

The LXX canon has the apocrypha!

There actually varying editions referenced as the "LXX". I focus upon Codex Alexandrinus.

Did you know that the NT quotes words from Maccabees?