Good question! I wonder if they are firing any BLM protesters for their actual illegal acts.
Problem is, no one has found any BLM members doing that, yet.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Good question! I wonder if they are firing any BLM protesters for their actual illegal acts.
Well, Yehren, since you know everything, you KNOW that the policeman intended to the kill the guy, right?? You drive me to sarcasm with your incessant liberal gibberish.I'd say trying to excuse murder is immoral. How about you?
Um . . . I don't think that's too popular right now. Due process? I don't think people want that.Why not leave it to the judge and jury who try this case to determine if the officer is guilty of murder, okay?
I think it's been changing for a long time. The more you can get people on the dole, the better you can control them.Why are so many calling for action? Because they can. The debate is not about the past, but how we view it. The problem is everything is a perspective and our culture and morality is fluid.
Too many disadvantaged people need an outlet. What happens if solutions are not forth coming? The answers do not come overnight. The USA was founded on trying things out, not looking for handouts. Is this changing?
Let's go simple and easy to start.
BLM protestors leaving their agreed protest areas to illegally enter freeways and impede traffic, while harrassing and intimidating auto drivers and passengers while doing it.
Problem is, no one has found any BLM members doing that, yet.
Well, Yehren, since you know everything
you KNOW that the policeman intended to the kill the guy, right?
You drive me to sarcasm with your incessant liberal gibberish.
LOL! No, more like someone got HER knickers wadded! Keep it rational? Okay, please do.Someone's got his knickers wadded. Try to keep it rational, um?
I think it's been changing for a long time. The more you can get people on the dole, the better you can control them.
LOL! No, more like someone got HER knickers wadded!
Fact is . . . had he complied with their original lawful orders, I think all that would have happened is that they would have loaded him into a police car and taken him to jail.
Why not leave it to the judge and jury who try this case to determine if the officer is guilty of murder, okay?
Someone's got his knickers wadded. Try to keep it rational, um?
Hmm... he knew compressing the carotid artery for a long time is lethal. The handcuffed victim repeatedly said he couldn't breathe, yet the killer continued to kneel on his neck. When he went limp, the killer continued to kneel on his neck for several minutes afterward.
You figure it out.
Anger isn't a symptom of rationality. Might be an important clue for you.
It certainly APPEARS that the officer used excessive force, but you would think that if a procedure for restraint routinely used by police departments is known to cause death, they wouldn't use it. Something is not making sense.Here is the problem, what that officer did is policy...a prescribed and trained procedure...process. He did it too long.
That is going to be the argument. The officer was showing no emotion in the video so he can argue that he was doing what he was trained to do. Obviously he did wrong. The question is how wrong? Then the problem is everyone wants the highest charge....The higher the charge the less likely they are going to get that conviction. A good lawyer and they may not even get manslaughter.
He had a secondary health condition. Actually I believe he had heart disease and Covid.It certainly APPEARS that the officer used excessive force, but you would think that if a procedure for restraint routinely used by police departments is known to cause death, they wouldn't use it. Something is not making sense.
Good post! This is the problem. People think they know, but they don't KNOW, so we get more and more lunacy from the left.You are trying this guy based on media evidence, and have found him guilty. "applied capital punishment" = premeditated murder. Where is you evidence? How do you know this cop didn't expect George Floyd to survive?
In fact it is not known to cause death...that is the point that is in the police officer's benefit. There is no doubt that he did wrong, but police officers do not always believe what they are told during an arrest. Still wrong was done, the question is how wrong. Did the officer look like he was angry and had an intent to hurt him. All that is going to be argued. But trying to get him and the others convict of murder is not likely.It certainly APPEARS that the officer used excessive force, but you would think that if a procedure for restraint routinely used by police departments is known to cause death, they wouldn't use it. Something is not making sense.
He may not have died had he not had a heart condition.
You are trying this guy based on media evidence,
and have found him guilty.
"applied capital punishment" = premeditated murder.
why pick out this death to spin it into the excuse to burn and loot our cities?
40 years pass, and I can now see how easily this could happen in the United States and how evil could take over! We are not the Constitution loving, 'Freedom and Liberty' giants I thought we were!