Taken
Well-Known Member
Brothers and sisters of Jesus?
They are not the children of Mary!
Repeating yourself over and over OF HOW Mary disobey God, by not Multiplying, reproducing children with her husband, is rather disingenuous.
Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.
You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Brothers and sisters of Jesus?
They are not the children of Mary!
Repeating yourself over and over OF HOW Mary disobey God, by not Multiplying, reproducing children with her husband, is rather disingenuous.
I, too, came to the conclusion of the apostle "James" in Gal. 1:19 and the "James" in Matt. 13:55 and Mk. 6:3 are the same, but not just because a "James" is identified as a brother of Jesus in each of those verses, nor did I assume any of the meanings of the word "brother" apply.
Refer back to post #9 for why Apostle James of Alphaeus is the "James" in the aforementioned verses, and why he could not have been Jesus's brother, as in "born of the same father and/or mother."
that’s a generalization
In post #98 you acknowledged the word "brother" has a range of meanings. Why do none apply, except for "born of the same father and/or mother," beyond your assumption that meaning applies in Matt. 13:55, Mk. 6:3, and Gal. 1:19, etc?
I consider the Context, regarding the surrounding texts.
So what is your position?
Mary had children with her husband Joseph, or not?
How does the context in each verse (Matt. 13:55, Mk. 6:3, and Gal. 1:19, etc) support the meaning "born of the same father and/or mother" applies to the word "brother" in them?
Biological children? No.
What is and how does the context in each verse (Matt. 13:55, Mk. 6:3, and Gal. 1:19, etc) support the meaning "born of the same father and/or mother" applies to the word "brother" in them?
The Blessed Virgin Mary and [St.] Joseph had both chosen to be chaste.
I already know the context, and if your understanding of the context was the same, I would not have asked you to say what you believe the context is in each verse (Matt. 13:55, Mk. 6:3, and Gal. 1:19, etc), and explain how it supports the meaning "born of the same father and/or mother" applies to the word "brother" in them.
It is not mentioned in the Bible,
...details surrounding their betrothal and marriage,
Are you open to reading what is known as "extrabiblical" texts?
Or, are you not open, because you believe everything there is to know about the persons in the Bible is in the Bible?
I did not say I was confused about the context surrounding and in Matt. 13:55, Mk. 6:3, and Gal. 1:19. I asked you to say what you believe the context surrounding and in those verses is that supports the meaning "born of the same father and/or mother" applies to the word "brother" in them, beyond your assumption it does, but you just cited the verses themselves. That demonstrates to me an assumption is all you have.
Second there are no scriptures that say Jesus has siblings
none
Never
Perpetual Virgin according to scripture
You acknowledged the word "brother" has a range of meanings (#98),
and to assume
The point is, the details surrounding their betrothal and marriage, regardless of whether one finds that sufficient or not to know, is not in the Bible, but we know that information exists, based on the information that is in the Bible that says they were betrothed and married.
Ok, but that does not answer the question which is, again, do you believe everything there is to know about the persons in the Bible is in the Bible?