Mask Control: Prove COVID-19 exists...I dare you!

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Status
Not open for further replies.

jaybird

Well-Known Member
Feb 29, 2016
1,595
559
113
You're talking out of your hat.
You must be thinking of John Lennon. Though John was evil too. He wrote about peace and yet physically abused his women and neglected his kids.
Everything else you've stated there is without merit and is not supported by actual history.
Lenin was a devil. He was responsible for the murder of millions and the last Tsar he had killed was Romanov. The Romanov's were Russian.
U got lenin confused with stalin. The romanovs were more german than russian.
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
8,838
9,578
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Top Ten Reasons to Get Out of the UN
November 19, 2020

emblems.jpeg


THE SCAMDEMIC IS BEST UNDERSTOOD IN TERMS OF A CONSPIRACY FOR WORLD GOVERNMENT TYRANNY
BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS' AGENDA FOR THE 21 CENTURY. IT APPEARS THAT MANY OF OUR LEADERS HAVE SIGNED ON
WITHOUT CONSULTING US. THIS EXPLAINS WHY THEY HAVE SOLD US OUT NOW.


BELOW JOHN MCMANUS EXPLAINS THAT THE UN REALLY REPRESENTS COMMUNIST TYRANNY.

"Top 10 Reasons to Get US Out! of the UN,"
by John F. McManus (JBS Bulletin Aug 2019)
Are You Aware?
Many of our nation's leaders
have been working for decades to deliver the United States to the United Nations as the major step in building an UN-controlled New World Order.
Each year since the founding of the UN in 1945, the conspirators for global control have taken steps that threaten to destroy the independence of our nation and the freedoms of the American people.

Please read what follows and join in the campaign to Get US Out! of the United Nations.
1.
Incompatibility of the U.S. and UN Systems of Government
U.S. System: Basic rights are given by God and cannot be overruled. Freedom prevails. (See U.S. Declaration of Independence, 1776.)
UN System: Basic rights are granted by the UN government and can be canceled "by law." No recognition of God. The world body lists rights it recognizes and then claims power to abolish them "by law." (See the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, and the UN's International Covenant On Civil and Political Rights, 1966.)

2. UN Seeks to Disarm American Citizens and Cancel the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution
The UN has always sought to ban private ownership of weapons. For instance, the world body published Our Global Neighborhood in 1995, calling for "the disarming of civilians."
The UN Arms Trade Treaty (adopted by the UN in 2013) would ultimately disarm Americans. It was signed by the U.S. in 2013, but has not been ratified by the U.S. Senate.

3. The UN Is a Lawless Body; It Violates Article 2 of Its Own Charter
Article 2 of the UN Charter states: "Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state [nation]...."
Examples of UN violation of its own Charter include: (a) forcing U.S. citizens to cancel plans to mine gold in Montana; (b) targeting U.S. law that permits capital punishment; (c) condemning the U.S. Border Patrol for efforts to bar entry of illegal immigrants; and (d) urging independence of Puerto Rico when even the people of that U.S. possession have repeatedly indicated they don't want their relationship to the U.S. changed.
hiss876.jpeg

(Alger Hiss)

4. Every UN Secretary-General Has Been Either a Communist or a Socialist
1945-46: Alger Hiss, Communist (United States)
1946-53: Trygve Lie, Socialist (Norway)
1953-61: Dag Hammarskjold, Socialist (Sweden)
1962-71: U Thant, Socialist (Burma, now Myanmar)
1972-81: Kurt Waldheim, Nazi Socialist (Austria)
1982-91: Javier Perez de Cuellar, Socialist (Peru)
1992-96: Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Socialist (Egypt)
1997-06: Kofi Annan, Socialist (Ghana)
2007-16: Ban Ki-moon, Socialist (South Korea)
2017- : Antonio Guterres, Communist (Portugal)

5. UN Charter's Article 25 Overrides U.S. Constitution and American Sovereignty
The complete text of Article 25 states: "The Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the [UN] Security Council in accordance with the present Charter."
No President or member of Congress who has sworn a solemn oath to abide by the U.S. Constitution can permit Article 25 to dictate U.S. policy. However, most of America's elected officials believe our nation is obliged to deliver forces and arms when the UN calls for them.

6. Articles 39-51 of the UN Charter authorized the UN to direct U.S. participation in the "undeclared," "no-win" Korean War. Articles 52-54 of the UN Charter authorized creation of NATO and SEATO as UN "regional alliances," which led to U.S. involvement in "undeclared," "no-win" wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan.
Established in 1945, the UN directed the Korean War (34,000 Americans killed and 92,000 wounded). This war has never been settled.
Formed in 1954, SEATO directed the Vietnam War (47,000 Americans killed and 153,000 wounded). The Vietnam War could have been won but for restrictions from on high. This war marked the first defeat in our nation's history.
Congress declared neither the Korean War nor the Vietnam War as required by the U.S. Constitution. United States involvement in these two wars was due to our membership in the UN and SEATO.
Established in 1949, NATO conducted the "undeclared," "no-win" war in Afghanistan from August 2003 to December 2014 as the leader of a UN-mandated coalition of 50 nations, which included the United States, and which at its height had 130,000 troops.

7. UN Leaders Oppose National Sovereignty, Favor a UN-Led World Government
U Thant (1970): "Lenin's ideals of peace are in line with the aims of the UN Charter."
Boutros-Ghali (1992): "The time of absolute and exclusive sovereignty has passed. It's time to rethink the question of sovereignty."
Kofi Annan (2000): "There must be new forms of global governance and global rules."

8. State Department Officials Bow to United Nations.
Secretary of State Dean Acheson, 1949: "NATO is designed to fit precisely into the framework of the United Nations."
John-Foster-Dulles.jpg

Left, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, 1957: "I have never seen any proposal made for ... world government or for world federation which could not be carried out either by the United Nations or under the United Nations Charter."
State Department Official Richard N. Gardner, 1974: "In short, the house of world order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down [via] an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece...."
Secretary of State Colin Powell, 2001: "When it comes to our role as a member of the Security Council, we obviously are bound by UN resolutions and we're not trying to modify that."

9. Numerous Divisions of the United Nations Headquartered in Huge Buildings Throughout the World Continue to Build the UN's Power Over All of Mankind.

The UN's Organizational Chart shows the presence and indicates control of the world body in the fields of education, population, children, women, environment, trade, finance, health, agriculture, labor, military, science, culture, atomic power, telecommunications, aviation, industrial development, narcotics, refugees, immigration, property rights, and more.

10. Disarmament for All -- Except the United Nations.
In 1961, the U.S. State Department issued a 19-page booklet entitled "Freedom From War: The U.S. Program For General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World."
This document's plan, never withdrawn, called for "progressive steps" leading to UN-dominated new world order. It summarizes elements of this frightening plan as follows:
(a) "States would retain only those forces and non-nuclear armaments ... required for maintaining internal order."
(b) "The UN Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning."
(c) "The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the UN Peace Force.... All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes."
(d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the UN would be sufficiently strong ... as to assure peace ... in a disarmed world."
Resistance to this hellish proposal generated by The John Birch Society over many years has led to its non-implementation. But appropriate government officials have frequently admitted that it is still the fixed and determined policy of several U.S. agencies and departments.

CONCLUSION
The United Nations is not taking over the United States. What is occurring is that the United States is being delivered to the United Nations. This delivery must be stopped. The course is clear. Withdrawal from the United Nations must be accomplished while there is still time to do so. Get US Out! of the United Nations.

---OUT OF THE GODLESS UN ..NOW----------------------
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
8,838
9,578
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Requires Storage At -70*C Because It Contains Experimental Nanotech Components That Have NEVER Been Used In Vaccines Before
HAF-Logo-64x64.png
HAFNovember 19, 2020

You’re seeing the reports all over the news: Pfizer’s new coronavirus vaccine requires storage at -70*C (-94F), which is much colder than the North Pole. If it’s not stored at this temperature, its ingredients begin to break down and it fails to work.

Currently Pfizer is claiming, without evidence, that its vaccine is “90% effective.” But this claim is little more than corporate propaganda designed to drive up stock prices through false projections.

But why do these vaccines need to be kept at -70*C in the first place?

Pfizer-COVID-19-Vaccine-Requires-Storage-at-70C-Experimental-Nanotech-e1605789703261.png


The answer, it turns out, is because they contain potentially hazardous ingredients that have never been used in vaccines before.


As Children’s Health Defense explained in an August 6th article, “mRNA vaccines undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna vaccine, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG).”

CHD goes on to explain:

The use of PEG in drugs and vaccines is increasingly controversial due to the well-documented incidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylaxis.

Roughly seven in ten Americans may already be sensitized to PEG, which may result in reduced efficacy of the vaccine and an increase in adverse side effects.

If a PEG-containing mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 gains FDA approval, the uptick in exposure to PEG will be unprecedented — and potentially disastrous.

Moderna documents and publications indicate that the company is well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology but is more concerned with its bottom line.


Learn more about the super cold temperature requirements for the coronavirus vaccine in my Daily News Brief for Nov. 18th, 2020:



Lipid Nanoparticles Cause Hyperinflammatory Responses In The Body, Leading To Severe Reactions, Hospitalization And Potentially DEATH
Why are LNPs (Lipid Nanoparticles) used in these vaccines?

As CHD further explains:

LNPs “encapsulate the mRNA constructs to protect them from degradation and promote cellular uptake” and, additionally, rev up the immune system (a property that vaccine scientists tamely describe as LNPs’ “inherent adjuvant properties”).

In other words, the LNPs are adjuvants, meaning they are designed to cause hyperinflammatory responses in human beings, once injected.

This is done in an effort to induce the creation of antibodies that then allow the vaccine manufacturer to claim high “effectiveness” rates, even when those very same adjuvants cause severe adverse reactions.

According to recent vaccine trials conducted by Moderna, 100% of human subjects in the high-dose vaccine trial group experienced adverse reactions.
 

Bobby Jo

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2019
8,041
3,778
113
United States
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
...
According to recent vaccine trials conducted by Moderna, 100% of human subjects in the high-dose vaccine trial group experienced adverse reactions.

I'm reminded of:

Rev. 16:2 So the first angel went and poured his bowl on the earth, and foul and evil sores came upon the men who bore the mark of the beast and worshiped its image.


Of course I couldn't previously reconcile how the Right Hand and Forehead, -- palm & retinal scans --, could cause an immune system response. Thus I had to leave open the prospect for an implanted "chip". But now it appears there's a NEW aspect which accounts for being included in the Electronic Currency System, -- an Immunization Certificate --, with the subsequent physiological reaction.

Whoda guessed?!?
Bobby Jo
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
8,838
9,578
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
I'm reminded of:

Rev. 16:2 So the first angel went and poured his bowl on the earth, and foul and evil sores came upon the men who bore the mark of the beast and worshiped its image.


Of course I couldn't previously reconcile how the Right Hand and Forehead, -- palm & retinal scans --, could cause an immune system response. Thus I had to leave open the prospect for an implanted "chip". But now it appears there's a NEW aspect which accounts for being included in the Electronic Currency System, -- an Immunization Certificate --, with the subsequent physiological reaction.

Whoda guessed?!?
Bobby Jo
REV 16:2 comes to my mind as well ...the body will violently react to the foreign objects - the nano tech materials and the synthetic poisons within the body will emerge as deformities and huge sores
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby Jo

WaterSong

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2020
2,245
2,277
113
Kansas City
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Below is an article that appears on law.com. However, the public cannot access it because it is behind a subscriber wall. This is that article.



New York State Bar Passes Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Recommendation
Sun, 11/08/2020 - 00:53 — legitgov
New York State Bar Passes Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccination Recommendation | 07 Nov 2020 | The New York State Bar Association on Saturday passed a resolution urging the state to consider making it mandatory for all New Yorkers to undergo COVID-19 vaccination when a vaccine becomes available, even if people object to it for "religious, philosophical or personal reasons." The resolution, which was passed by a majority of the bar association's 277-member House of Delegates and which speaks on behalf of the 70,000-lawyer organization, includes conditions limiting its scope. Those include that the state government should only consider making COVID-19 vaccinations mandatory if voluntary vaccinations fall short of producing needed levels of population immunity; that an assessment of the health threat to various communities be made so that perhaps the mandate can be targeted; and that a mandate only be considered after there is expert consensus regarding the vaccine's safety and efficacy...The report had recommended that it should be mandatory for all Americans to undergo COVID-19 vaccination, despite people's objections, with the one exception being the doctor-ordered medical reason for not being vaccinated. There was no language about the mandate being limited to New York state residents, and no language saying that a public recommendation made to the government should only be for a government to "consider" employing the mandate. [*We'll take your shot after you take ours.*]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby Jo

JohnDB

Well-Known Member
Feb 7, 2010
4,342
2,837
113
TN
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well,
Considering that there are more people that truly believe that lizard people from outer space are actually running the Government than the number of practicing Jews in the world...

They are going to stamp out the crazy theories by making it mandatory.

There's nothing else to do with it.
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
8,838
9,578
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Major New Study: No Evidence Masks Work
HAF-Logo-64x64.png
HAFNovember 20, 2020

In the first comprehensive, peer-reviewed study the efficacy of face masks to prevent the spread of Covid has been called into question.

Within the margin of error there is virtually no difference between a masked group and an unmasked group, Danish scientists discovered.

Masks-dont-work.jpeg


Yet this major discovery about the virus is being completely ignored by authoritarian governors who are demanding even MORE intrusive mask mandates.

Are we really following “the science”? Or politics…


Sweden: No Hard Lockdowns, Masks, Or Social Distancing And One Of The Lowest COVID-19 Fatality Rate In Europe
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby Jo

JohnDB

Well-Known Member
Feb 7, 2010
4,342
2,837
113
TN
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Major New Study: No Evidence Masks Work
HAF-Logo-64x64.png
HAFNovember 20, 2020

In the first comprehensive, peer-reviewed study the efficacy of face masks to prevent the spread of Covid has been called into question.

Within the margin of error there is virtually no difference between a masked group and an unmasked group, Danish scientists discovered.

Masks-dont-work.jpeg


Yet this major discovery about the virus is being completely ignored by authoritarian governors who are demanding even MORE intrusive mask mandates.

Are we really following “the science”? Or politics…


Sweden: No Hard Lockdowns, Masks, Or Social Distancing And One Of The Lowest COVID-19 Fatality Rate In Europe

A completely different culture.

Not the same as American culture.
 

JohnDB

Well-Known Member
Feb 7, 2010
4,342
2,837
113
TN
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Well.
Here in Nashville TN Vanderland University hospital is full. They are now putting new patients in children's hospital because they have empty beds.

I'm not sorry to wear a mask and possibly save my life or more importantly someone else's from catching it from me. (I quarantine a lot)

My life isn't as important as others is.

Anti Mask people simply don't care if they kill anyone by not wearing a mask.
 

Reggie Belafonte

Well-Known Member
Mar 16, 2018
5,803
2,893
113
63
Brisbane
Faith
Christian
Country
Australia
Major New Study: No Evidence Masks Work
HAF-Logo-64x64.png
HAFNovember 20, 2020

In the first comprehensive, peer-reviewed study the efficacy of face masks to prevent the spread of Covid has been called into question.

Within the margin of error there is virtually no difference between a masked group and an unmasked group, Danish scientists discovered.

Masks-dont-work.jpeg


Yet this major discovery about the virus is being completely ignored by authoritarian governors who are demanding even MORE intrusive mask mandates.

Are we really following “the science”? Or politics…


Sweden: No Hard Lockdowns, Masks, Or Social Distancing And One Of The Lowest COVID-19 Fatality Rate In Europe
Face diaper is the real name for such.
I have copped flack from calling such a Face Diaper, people do not like it called that, but that is what it is.
If you have covid or you think you may have it, you should have a Face diaper on and if you are talking to others or such especially because if you cough or sneeze.
You get some idiots who have to talk real close to you and some times I have had bits of sober come shooting out on you when they speak to you, this type are a pain and should have a fact diaper on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: APAK

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
8,838
9,578
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Portuguese Court Rules: PCR Tests Are Unreliable – It’s Unlawful To Quarantine People
HAF-Logo-64x64.png
HAFNovember 20, 2020

A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that…

“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”

Portuguese-Court-Rules-PCR-Tests-Are-Unreliable-%E2%80%93-Its-Unlawful-to-Quarantine-People.jpg


The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown.


The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%.

To better understand how testing is done, please read this article: Fauci States COVID Test Has Fatal Flaw

This case concerned the fact that four people had been quarantined by the Regional Health Authority.

Of these, one had tested positive for COVID using a PCR test; the other three were deemed to have undergone a high risk of exposure.

Consequently, the Regional Health Authority decided that all four were infectious and a health hazard, which required that they go into isolation.

The court’s summary of the case to rule against the Regional Health Authority’s appeal reads as follows:


“Given how much scientific doubt exists — as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter — about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it.”
 

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
8,838
9,578
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Britons who test negative for Covid twice in a week are set to receive a 'freedom pass' under government scheme that will allow them to live a normal life
  • It is hoped the scheme could allow Britons to go back to a relatively normal life
  • To earn a freedom pass people will need to get a negative test twice a week
  • Pass will allow you to mix with friends and family without distancing or masks
By DANYAL HUSSAIN FOR MAILONLINE

PUBLISHED: 03:17 EST, 22 November 2020 | UPDATED: 03:21 EST, 22 November 2020


Britons are set to be given Covid 'freedom passes' as long as they test negative for the virus twice in a week, it has been suggested.

The details of the scheme are still being ironed out by officials in Whitehall, who hope it will allow the country to get back to normal next year.

To earn the freedom pass, people will need to be tested regularly and, provided the results come back negative, they will then be given a letter, card or document they can show to people as they move around.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

So the government will the use the sheep to restrict/permit God-fearing people, their God-given right and freedom to move about ans assemble with each other....a neat self-policing trick...allowing and empower the sheep in the pen as in a prison to enforce the government edicts as they think it is their own law...the mob's gang law..very deceitful and evil..

APAK
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby Jo

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
8,838
9,578
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
UK Supreme Court Judge Slams ‘Totalitarian’ COVID ‘Control Freaks’ In Government
by Steve Watson

A British Supreme Court judge has slammed the UK government as ‘control freaks’ for attempting to control people’s lives under the guise of COVID, and labeled it “morally and constitutionally indefensible” to define what freedoms the public should and shouldn’t have.

UK Supreme Court Judge Slams ‘Totalitarian’ COVID ‘Control Freaks’ In Government

In an op-ed published Sunday, Lord Sumption noted that the “debate about whether to let us have a family Christmas perfectly sums up what is wrong with this Government’s handling” of the crisis.

Sumption wrote that there are “many different answers to the dilemmas of a Covid Christmas”, yet the crux of the matter is “whether we should be allowed to make the choice for ourselves, instead of having it imposed on us by law.”

“But for the Jacobins of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) and the control freaks in the Department of Health, theirs is the only answer,” Sumption urged.

The British government has posited allowing people to spend 5 days in the company of their relatives over Christmas, but with the caveat that in January they will have to pay back the privilege with more lockdown time, specifically another 25 days.

Lord Sumption, who served as a senior judge on the Supreme Court of the UK between between 2012 and 2018, slammed the Prime Minister Boris Johnson, suggesting he is engaging in “public relations management” rather than leadership.

“Boris Johnson knows that restrictions over Christmas would be deeply unpopular, widely ignored and catastrophic for the retail and hospitality industries,” Sumption asserted.


“So he will soon announce their temporary suspension, behaving as if our lives belonged to the state and Christmas was an act of indulgence on his part,” the judge added.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bobby Jo

APAK

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2018
8,838
9,578
113
Florida
Faith
Christian
Country
United States
Head of WHO Suggests COVID Restrictions Will Continue Even After Vaccine
by Paul Joseph Watson
The head of the World Health Organization has suggested that coronavirus restrictions will continue even after a vaccine has been made widely available.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus made the comments on Twitter after news broke of several new vaccines said to be effective in fighting COVID-19 coming closer to fruition.

“Since the beginning of the #COVID19 pandemic, we knew that a vaccine would be essential for bringing the pandemic under control. But it’s important to emphasise that a vaccine will complement the other tools we have, not replace them,” said Ghebreyesus.

Head of WHO Suggests COVID Restrictions Will Continue Even After Vaccine

He went on to add that quarantines, surveillance, contact tracing and other measures would all be continued even after vaccine uptake becomes widespread.



As we have exhaustively highlighted, numerous other prominent individuals have asserted that rolling lockdowns, mask wearing, social distancing and other restrictions are here to stay after the pandemic is over.

In his book Covid-19: The Great Reset, World Economic Forum globalist Klaus Schwab asserts that the world will “never” return to normal, despite him admitting that coronavirus “doesn’t pose a new existential threat.”

A senior U.S. Army official also said that mask wearing and social distancing will become permanent, while CNN’s international security editor Nick Paton Walsh asserted that the mandatory wearing of masks will become “permanent,” “just part of life,” and that the public would need to “come to terms with it.”

Commenting on the issue, Joseph Massey said Ghebreyesus’ statement re-affirmed the fact that COVID lockdowns are more about “social engineering” than ending a pandemic.

“I’m not a conspiracy theorist, nor am I a COVID denier, but people like this make it difficult not to believe that lockdowns are more about social engineering than they are about stopping the virus,” he tweeted. “A vaccine is not a “complement” to being isolated and muzzled like an animal.”

———————————————————————————————————————
 
Status
Not open for further replies.