Polt said:When Peter was called out by Paul for judaizing, Peter should have used that line. Oh wait, Peter did the right thing and saw his error.
The only form of Judaism that all the world's Jewish denominations agree to is rejecting Jesus.
Galatians 1:18-20 KJVdaq said:Have you never looked into the mirror and said to the one staring back at you, "Get thee behind me"? Two separate Apostles would not openly dispute each other in public before the congregation or elders and the anthropos Paulos would certainly not openly rebuke the one whom Yeshua clearly commanded to go not only to the Circumcision but also to the Uncircumcision when Simon Ioannou received the three commissions, "Feed my arnion-lambkins", "Shepherd my probaton-sheep", "Feed my probaton-sheep". Therefore divide yourself in twain and perhaps then you might understand Petros/Paulos. Otherwise when you stand at the pearly gates expecting to be let in by Paulos you will find Petros. :lol:
Do you not think it strange that Peter is actually the one who states the very things which Paul claims to have confronted him about in front of the apostles and elders? Do you not find it a little odd that Peter is the one whom God made choice among all of them in order that the Gentiles should hear the Gospel by his mouth and believe? Paul states that he walks according to the Spirit and therefore this is the Light of everything he teaches. If we do not understand his writings in this Light, and ourselves walking according to the Spirit of the Word, then it is not possible that the natural mind of the natural man will understand. For the same reason the translators have butchered the passage which you reference from Galatians where not even the names "Kephas" and "Petros" are in agreement in all of the manuscripts.
Acts 15:5-11 KJV
5. But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses.
6. And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter.
7. And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
8. And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us;
9. And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
10. Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?
11. But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.
17. Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus.
18. Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days.
19. But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.
20. Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not.
Galatians 1:17-20 ASV
17. neither went I up to Jerusalem to them that were apostles before me: but I went away into Arabia; and again I returned unto Damascus.
18. Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to visit Cephas, and tarried with him fifteen days.
19. But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.
20. Now touching the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not.
The fact that Paul feels the need to even make the statement here, that he is "not lying", should be enough to raise a red flag to what he is about to say. If that were not enough there is a discrepancy in whether he writes that he went to see "Petros" or "Kephas". Which one is it and why does it matter? In addition the reason Paul states here that before God he is "not lying" is because on the surface there is indeed a direct contradiction in what he states here compared to what is recorded in the Acts when he returned from Damascus:
Acts 9:26-28 KJV
26. And when Saul was come to Jerusalem, he assayed to join himself to the disciples: but they were all afraid of him, and believed not that he was a disciple.
27. But Barnabas took him, and brought him to the apostles, and declared unto them how he had seen the Lord in the way, and that he had spoken to him, and how he had preached boldly at Damascus in the name of Jesus.
28. And he was with them coming in and going out at Jerusalem.
It is fairly obvious that Paul is purposely drawing attention to these things and is therefore truly NOT lying; otherwise why would he draw attention to the facts? Now either you will go find out what all of this means or continue happily on your merry way believing a tainted version of Paul, and who he is, and what he is truly stating to be the case in Galatians. However, the popular flesh minded version of Paul is disqualified for making the Scripture into a lie, yet thankfully my version and understanding of Paulos is perfectly in accordance with the Truth of the Scripture and the Spirit thereof, whether you and your friends think of these things as "fruitcake recipes", "hook and crook paganism", or whatever other vain attempts at character assassination your feeble minds may conjure up. :lol: