”meat is for those who have eaten from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil”
“senses”
have all eaten from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil? The hard part for me is evil comes naturally so I must of eaten of the tree? So naturally it seems impossible to do anything except that. It is doing better or learning something new that His Word seems to help with….leads, guides, teaches? So, I’m not sure what you saying here…the reason I thought of the passage where Paul says he will eat no meat if it causes his brother to offend. Is because would it have crossed Sauls mind, so Paul (to me) has a discerning of evil and good in knowing the difference, or at least that is an opinion. Paul could have eaten the meat to prove his own liberty in doing so and destroyed his brother as one who lacks the same liberty. You mentioned ‘puffs’ up as not a good thing. I think you were asking how am I seeing puffed up… as a good thing or bad …there be giants in the land?
The passage where Paul speaks of eating no meat if it causes his brother to offend. Interesting is ‘meat commends us not to God’
1 Corinthians 8:8
Romans 14:16-17 Let not then your good be evil spoken of: [17] For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.
A verse that has changed in some way to me since this thread is Philippians 4:8. Because of the above ‘whatsoever is of a good report’ and also where Paul spoke of even though they appeared as being reprobates he wished they would do what is honest, not so he would appear approved but that he encouraged their perfection. ‘Do what is honest’. That is why the following changed because I’ve always been taught or saw it as to think on pure things was to think on ‘lovely things’ like puppies, kittens and rainbows. But is that what it is saying? To think on fluffy thoughts as a way of checking out of reality? ‘Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true,
whatsoever things are honest(even though we appear as reprobate), whatsoever things
are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are
of good report; if there be any virtue, and if
there be any praise, think on these things.’
Which, again, only an opinion but it appears Paul did ‘think on these things’ and was changed because of and for ‘these things’. So I question what commends us unto God when meat commends us not unto God, (neither are we worse or better) instead what commends us unto God … “against such there is no law”: But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, [23] Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. [24] And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts. [25] If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit. [26] Let us not be desirous of vain glory, provoking one another, envying one another.
Consider
Philippians 4:8 Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.
Is somewhere in there ‘And they that are Christ's have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.’?