"Normal" Vaccine Alternatives to the mRNA Vaccine Are Coming!

[The Barbarian]

2 Chronicles 16:12-13
12 And in the thirty-ninth year of his reign, Asa became diseased in his feet, and his malady was severe; yet in his disease he did not seek the LORD, but the physicians. 13 So Asa rested with his fathers; he died in the forty-first year of his reign.

In my hometown, we had a family that were Christian Scientists. One of the children was unable to walk normally because of some disease they had; his parents sought God's healing, rather than getting medical care for him.

 

[Armour of God]

You're constantly peddling pseudoscience

I'm just opposing pseudo-science
Your the one peddling it

As an example, you were completely unaware of my comments about Christian ethics, even on this very thread. Your obsession with weird anti-science ideas seems to overwhelm anything else you might care about

I make more posts on other threads than these type of threads

 

[The Barbarian]

I'm just opposing pseudo-science

I see the denial. But your peddling of pseudo-science is more persuasive.

I make more posts on other threads than these type of threads

Maybe it would be healthy for you to spend more time on God and His message to us, and less time peddling all sorts of quack denier stories.

 

[Armour of God]

I see the denial. But your peddling of pseudo-science is more persuasive.


Maybe it would be healthy for you to spend more time on God and His message to us, and less time peddling all sorts of quack denier stories.

Your the Godless quack that peddles pseudo-science. It pulls people away from God, especially ToE. That pulls many people away from God as it did with me.

Believing we came from monkeys like Lucy is a Godless abomination that you try to teach that's only built on assumption, not real science.

That's why I can't stand it and I try stop people from getting pulled away from God with these erroneous claims. You try to pull people away from God with your pseudo-scientific lies.

I refuted your nonsense about the theory of evolution and covid, others did too and I witnessed others refute your nonsense on climate change.

All in all, very few people have fallen for your pseudo-science on this forum.
Thank God for that

 

[The Barbarian]

Your the Godless quack that peddles pseudo-science.

I get your denial, but I don't think it means you're Godless; you're just stuck in the cult of pseudo-science. For all I know, you could be a completely committed follower of Christ. If you got from my words that I doubt your faith in God, I do apologize. I never meant to accuse you of Godlessness.

Believing we came from monkeys

Humans never evolved from monkeys; they are too evolved in a different direction.

like Lucy

Lucy had no tail, was bipedal, and lacked thumbs on her feet. More like a human than like a monkey. A lot of ignorant people got this mixed up, harming both their faith and their understanding of what it means to be human.

That pulls many people away from God as it did with me.

I am truly sorry to hear that. But ignorance is curable.

I refuted your nonsense about the theory of evolution

You were asked which of the four points of Darwinian theory have been refuted, and you declined to tell us. Are you ready to do that now?

I witnessed others refute your nonsense on climate change.

I merely posted the data. Hard to refute reality. But for the cult it's not about reality, is it?

All in all, very few people have fallen for your pseudo-science on this forum.

There are a few. I'm asking them to just go and see the data for themselves. The first step to escaping the cult is to start thinking for yourself.

 

[Armour of God]

you're just stuck in the cult of pseudo-science.

Pseudo-science is only applied to the party claiming to be presenting the so called science. I'm not presenting the science, I'm refuting it.

And what's with the use of this word "cult". It's just a derogatory personal attack, an ad hominem. Attacking the person instead of the argument. Nothing "cult" debunking a scientific claim.

Humans never evolved from monkeys; they are too evolved in a different direction

Nonsense. Lucy is monkey, covered in hair. The tree of evolution says humans came from monkeys. Morphology also shows this in diagrams showing a monkey morphing into a man

Lucy had no tail, was bipedal, and lacked thumbs on her feet

Typical pseudo-science assumptions that has no foundation. Just a bunch of scattered bones from a monkey. No foot bones so you can only assume it had no thumb and was bipedal and the hip bone was modified to suit as shown in a documentary.

You were asked which of the four points of Darwinian theory have been refuted, and you declined to tell us. Are you ready to do that now?

I refuted them all, I'm not getting dragged into this nonsense again. The main point is that no species has ever been seen to come from another, not in a lab and in the field it is only assumed.

I merely posted the data. Hard to refute reality. But for the cult it's not about reality, is it?

Your data was full of assumptions and easy to refute. It was garbage, not scientific at all and everyone on this forum saw it.
And there's your personal attack again. It's not a "cult" to disagree with someone.

There are a few. I'm asking them to just go and see the data for themselves. The first step to escaping the cult is to start thinking for yourself

And again with your use of this word "cult".
If anything it's you that is in a cult.
The pseudo-science cult, run by God hating atheists that have deceived you.

 

[The Barbarian]

Pseudo-science is only applied to the party claiming to be presenting the so called science.

No.
Pseudoscience consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that claim to be scientific or factual but are inherently incompatible with the scientific method. Pseudoscience is often characterized by contradictory, exaggerated or unfalsifiable claims; reliance on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at refutation; lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; absence of systematic practices when developing hypotheses; and continued adherence long after the pseudoscientific hypotheses have been experimentally discredited.

Pseudoscience - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

And what's with the use of this word "cult".

‘It’s almost like grooming’: how anti‑vaxxers, conspiracy theorists, and the far‑right came together over COVID​

‘It’s almost like grooming’: how anti-vaxxers, conspiracy theorists, and the far-right came together over COVID

Far right nationalists, anti-vaxxers, libertarians and conspiracy theorists have come together over COVID, and capitalised on the anger and uncertainty simmering in some sections of the community.

theconversation.com

Humans never evolved from monkeys; they are too evolved in a different direction

Lucy is monkey

No. Because you don't know anything about biology, you've confused apes and monkeys, which are very different things.

The tree of evolution says humans came from monkeys.

No. Again, because you don't know anything about this issue, you're constantly making errors like this.

Morphology also shows this in diagrams showing a monkey morphing into a man

Sounds... odd. Show us that. I'm guessing we'll be seeing some creationist imaginings, rather than scientific literature. But let's see what you have.

Lucy had no tail, was bipedal, and lacked thumbs on her feet

Typical pseudo-science assumptions that has no foundation.

We have a lot of Australopithecine fossils. No tails. Bipedal stance and no thumbs on feet.

No foot bones so you can only assume it had no thumb

Actually, there are a good number of such bones. And not surprisingly, the big toe is apart from the other toes, but adapted to walking, intermediate between humans and other apes. One early species of Australopithecine might even have been able to grasp with the foot.

was bipedal and the hip bone was modified to suit as shown in a documentary.

They lied to you about that, too. It wasn't just the hip, which is transitional between humans and other apes. It's the angle of the femur that makes it clear that Australopithecines were bipedal.


You were asked which of the four points of Darwinian theory have been refuted, and you declined to tell us. Are you ready to do that now?

I refuted them all, I'm not getting dragged into this nonsense again.

You know, most people, if they had actually refuted something, would be eager to show people again. No one can find that "refutation" you claim. And you don't want to show us.

If anything it's you that is in a cult.

I'm just showing you the data. And you seem remarkably shy about showing us any. Everyone notices.