other bible jws use.

[Mister Michael]

I can think of another person, and no it doesn't surprise me one bit.

I did. It was in regards Daniel, which every JW knows within the first few Bible studies, and must know in order to explain Revelation.

Was refering to @ozpen

 

[Jane_Doe22]

In nwt i believe it's message is that Jesus isn't the true God

while the Kjv for example saying that Jesus is in fact God and part of the "Trinity"

To be more accurate, the Bible says that Christ is the Son of God.

 

[Willie T]

Also we jws believe he was created as a spirit being in the beginning. So spirit beings could be the "gods"

But is there any verse that says Jesus was "created?" I read it that He already existed "in the beginning." Then, of course, we have to go to work and determine just what "the beginning" was. (Do you suppose you can do that from those same verses?)

 

[TheHolyBookEnds]

What about the NWT/JW use of the Emphatic Diaglott (also purplish cover)? - Emphatic Diaglott - Wikipedia

Which is based upon the Vatican MSS (Revelation 17)? - The emphatic diaglott: containing the original Greek text of what is commonly styled the New Testament (according to the recension of J.J. Griesbach) with an interlineary word for word English translation; a new emphatic version, based on the interlineary translation, on the renderings of eminent critics, and on the various readings of the Vatican manuscript no. 1209 in the Vatican Library; together with illustrative and explanatory foot notes, and a copious selection of references; to the whole of which is added a valuable alphabetical appendix

 

[Mister Michael]

But is there any verse that says Jesus was "created?" I read it that He already existed "in the beginning." Then, of course, we have to go to work and determine just what "the beginning" was. (Do you suppose you can do that from those same verses?)

From the Jw
Org
God created Jesus before creating Adam. In fact, God created Jesus and then used him to make everything else, including the angels. That is why the Bible calls Jesus “the firstborn of all creation” by God.—Read Colossians 1:15, 16.

Before he was born in Bethlehem, Jesus lived as a spirit creature in heaven. When the time came, God transferred Jesus’ life from heaven to Mary’s womb so that he could be born as a human.—Read Luke 1:30-32; John 6:38; 8:23.

 

[TheHolyBookEnds]

I don't see that much of a big differences besides JOHN 1:1 where it places "was God "with "Was A god"

 

[Jane_Doe22]

And here we go to the pointless loop of "my interpretation is better than yours"....

 

[Mister Michael]

And here we go to the pointless loop of "my interpretation is better than yours"....

I didn't say that lol.

 

[Jane_Doe22]

I didn't say that lol.

Oh but it's coming in the response, just wait for it.

 

[Mister Michael]

Oh but it's coming in the response, just wait for it.

Well jws use it and therefore i am a jw.

So i must use nwt and think it's the best.

Same goes with KJV onlyists

 

[TheHolyBookEnds]

Well jws use it and therefore i am a jw.

So i must use nwt and think it's the best.

Same goes with KJV onlyists

What about the NWT/JW use of the Emphatic Diaglott (also purplish cover)? - Emphatic Diaglott - Wikipedia

Which is based upon the Vatican MSS (Revelation 17)? - The emphatic diaglott: containing the original Greek text of what is commonly styled the New Testament (according to the recension of J.J. Griesbach) with an interlineary word for word English translation; a new emphatic version, based on the interlineary translation, on the renderings of eminent critics, and on the various readings of the Vatican manuscript no. 1209 in the Vatican Library; together with illustrative and explanatory foot notes, and a copious selection of references; to the whole of which is added a valuable alphabetical appendix

 

[Mister Michael]

lol propaganda

 

[Willie T]

It isn't whose interpretation is better, or "right", but which interpretation best expresses the original intent.

 

[OzSpen]

Do you look up "ten top wayz to defeat jws"

Curious cause it sounds like you use every opposing claim made by those people who make such lists such as. Who the translator.

How bout you ask me a genuine question throw away the script and actually ask me something

Michael,

These are false accusations against me:

1. I have never ever heard of the 'Ten top ways to defeat JWs'. That's a new one on me.
   
2. 'it sounds like you use every opposing claim made by those people who make such lists such as. Who the translator'. It is absolutely false that I 'use every opposing claim'. I made not one opposing claim. I asked for you to fulfill a simple request: Who are the translators of the NWT and what are their linguistic qualifications in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek?
   
3. My genuine question to you has been and still is: Please tell me the names of the translators of the NWT and their qualifications in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek!

I'm not being difficult. I would like for you to obtain this information and share with us to see if these translators are qualified to translate the Bible.

Oz

 

[Mister Michael]

Michael,

These are false accusations against me:

1. I have never ever heard of the 'Ten top ways to defeat JWs'. That's a new one on me.
   
2. 'it sounds like you use every opposing claim made by those people who make such lists such as. Who the translator'. It is absolutely false that I 'use every opposing claim'. I made not one opposing claim. I asked for you to fulfill a simple request: Who are the translators of the NWT and what are their linguistic qualifications in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek?
   
3. My genuine question to you has been and still is: Please tell me the names of the translators of the NWT and their qualifications in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek!

I'm not being difficult. I would like for you to obtain this information and share with us to see if these translators are qualified to translate the Bible.

Oz

Don't talk to me.

 

[OzSpen]

Give me one good reason and one only why i should know the "bible truth"

What is 'bible truth'?

 

[Mister Michael]

Don't talk to me.

Michael,

These are false accusations against me:

1. I have never ever heard of the 'Ten top ways to defeat JWs'. That's a new one on me.
   
2. 'it sounds like you use every opposing claim made by those people who make such lists such as. Who the translator'. It is absolutely false that I 'use every opposing claim'. I made not one opposing claim. I asked for you to fulfill a simple request: Who are the translators of the NWT and what are their linguistic qualifications in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek?
   
3. My genuine question to you has been and still is: Please tell me the names of the translators of the NWT and their qualifications in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek!

I'm not being difficult. I would like for you to obtain this information and share with us to see if these translators are qualified to translate the Bible.

Oz

I ALREADY TOLD YOU I DON'T KNOW AND NO I AM NOT ASKING THE ELDERS OR HIGHER UPS IN THE JWS SO STOP BUGGING ME I DON'T HAVE YOUR ANSWER CAN YOU SEE THAT. WHY YOU SO OBSESSED WITH JW THINGS. YOU WANT WANT TO DESTROY MY FAITH IN GOD SO I CAN FOLLOW YOUR GOD WELL NO THANK YOU I WON'T RESPOND TO ANY MORE MESSAGES. Thank you

 

[TheHolyBookEnds]

lol propaganda

 

[TheHolyBookEnds]

lol propaganda

Explain in detail please. I am all ready to hear.

 

[Jane_Doe22]

Well jws use it and therefore i am a jw.

So i must use nwt and think it's the best.

Same goes with KJV onlyists

No....