(Alpha and Omega;52672)
Look friend this has nothing to do with evolution at all. Thomas Chalmers was one of the first to teach this theory (1814). A full 45 years before Darwin even wrote his "Origin of Species" (1859). So the intent was not to compromise anything for evolution. The 2 subjects are completely different and unrelated. Furthermore, is the Bible wrong or the concordance? After all the concordance is not the word of God (although a great work in its own right). I'm sure it is prone to error. I'll take the literal wording in the Bible over the concordance any day. I have a question though. Was there oil before Noah's flood?
The bible is not wrong but then again we don't exactly have the bible in it's original text what we have is a translation which is why a lot of people use the concordance to try and get the fullest meaning. The concordance contains the actual words in Hebrew and Greek if you are going to take the literal word then a concordance is as close as you can get. I am not going to debate the evolutionary subject with you but it is evident that that is where all this springs up from the numbers e.t.c. Also I think the Word is clear you are of course like every one free to believe what you wish. I think I , treeoflife and a good many have expressed the young earth creation truth enough. At this point I think it's best to leave it to the HolySpirit to enlighten and fully reveal His truth in this matter, enough scriptures have been shared to touch hearts. Blessings to you and all those that have debated their stand.
Look friend this has nothing to do with evolution at all. Thomas Chalmers was one of the first to teach this theory (1814). A full 45 years before Darwin even wrote his "Origin of Species" (1859). So the intent was not to compromise anything for evolution. The 2 subjects are completely different and unrelated. Furthermore, is the Bible wrong or the concordance? After all the concordance is not the word of God (although a great work in its own right). I'm sure it is prone to error. I'll take the literal wording in the Bible over the concordance any day. I have a question though. Was there oil before Noah's flood?
The bible is not wrong but then again we don't exactly have the bible in it's original text what we have is a translation which is why a lot of people use the concordance to try and get the fullest meaning. The concordance contains the actual words in Hebrew and Greek if you are going to take the literal word then a concordance is as close as you can get. I am not going to debate the evolutionary subject with you but it is evident that that is where all this springs up from the numbers e.t.c. Also I think the Word is clear you are of course like every one free to believe what you wish. I think I , treeoflife and a good many have expressed the young earth creation truth enough. At this point I think it's best to leave it to the HolySpirit to enlighten and fully reveal His truth in this matter, enough scriptures have been shared to touch hearts. Blessings to you and all those that have debated their stand.