Proof of God

[Cahn333]

1=1 Two tokens of a thing are the bare necessities in order for a formulation of identity, it now 1 as type being communicated. Every thing is 1 and there is a potentially infinite number of them. So, our law gives (a transcendent) The One securing infinity.

 

[Mancunian]

Which God?

 

[Cahn333]

Funnily enough, the "one" God.

 

[PeterAndroz]

Funnily enough, the "one" God.

Yes, the ONE that you are hoping isn't waiting for you after your last breath, bet you won't be so smart then hey funny boy

 

[Mancunian]

Yes, the ONE that you are hoping isn't waiting for you after your last breath, bet you won't be so smart then hey funny boy

I'm not scared by your silly threats. If you want to live your life in fear that's up to you Peter.
I'm not hoping for anything.... When you're dead, you're dead.

 

[Mancunian]

Funnily enough, the "one" God.

Ahh, the one 'true' God.

 

[Cahn333]

Sure about that, you certain, cause Im certain she will be.

 

[Wrangler]

Which God?

Funnily enough, the "one" God.

Ahh, the one 'true' God.

@Mancunian, isn’t asking ’which God’ moving the goal post of this thread? Asking which God implies acceptance that the existence of God has been proven.

(I hold there are 4 categories of proofs and this thread seems to have convinced you via a 5th category @Cahn333 concisely articulated.) Yesterday, I was listening g to a podcast yesterday of transcendental meditation and mystical visions. How does an Atheist process such testimony?

 

[Mancunian]

@Mancunian, isn’t asking ’which God’ moving the goal post of this thread? Asking which God implies acceptance that the existence of God has been proven.

(I hold there are 4 categories of proofs and this thread seems to have convinced you via a 5th category @Cahn333 concisely articulated.) Yesterday, I was listening g to a podcast yesterday of transcendental meditation and mystical visions. How does an Atheist process such testimony?

I asked which God because Cahn333 has identified as other faith?

I would process each testimony on it's own merit.
How would a theist process it?

 

[Matthias]

I asked which God because Cahn333 has identified as other faith?

I would process each testimony on it's own merit.
How would a theist process it?

A Jewish monotheist would do it by searching the scriptures.

 

[Mancunian]

A Jewish monotheist would do it by searching the scriptures.

I haven't got time for that, remember, I believe that life is finite.
I won't be wasting much more of my time here.... I've got a large garden that needs to be prepared for winter.

 

[Mancunian]

A few more rubbish jokes maybe, and I'm out.

 

[Matthias]

I haven't got time for that, remember, I believe that life is finite.

You asked how a theist would do it. I told you how a Jewish monotheist would do it. Not all theists would do it the way a Jewish monotheist would.

I won't be wasting much more of my time here.... I've got a large garden that needs to be prepared for winter.

Go in peace.

 

[Mancunian]

I know that deep down you'll all miss me.

 

[Matthias]

I know that deep down you'll all miss me.

You’re either speaking tongue in cheek or you’re a poor observer of people. My money, if I were to wager it, would be on the former.

I, for one, will miss you. At least for a little while.

 

[Matthias]

Ahh, the one 'true' God.

John 17:3, not that you care what the Messiah thinks. It’s enough for me that you know what he thinks.

 

[Matthias]

A few more rubbish jokes maybe, and I'm out.

How long will that and preparing your large garden for winter take? Whatever it is, it’s virtually nothing in the eyes of the one true God.

 

[Mancunian]

How long will that and preparing your large garden for winter take? Whatever it is, it’s virtually nothing in the eyes of the one true God.

Ok, I can't help myself, I've got to reply to your nonsense.
I have as you do, a finite amount of time...
I like you get on with my day to day life, it will take me a few weeks to protect my delicate plants and bring inside my succulents.
Your God won't protect them, he's spent the last 2000 years sleeping/not existing.

Your God does nothing, he only exists in the minds of his misguided followers.... He does nothing to ease the suffering of the many because he's about as real as the Loch Ness Monster....

You're wasting your one and only life promoting superstitious nonsense from antiquity.
Wake up Matthias. Stop lying for Jesus and pretending that you're "in the know".

You know nothing, you're guessing, and your guesswork is ill informed and quite frankly ridiculous.

Your God didn't create the universe, your God used illiterate superstitious goat herders to spread the word?

I'm not a scared little man hiding behind his Bible. I'm living my life and being honest and true to myself. I pity you.

 

[Mancunian]

Apologies to everyone else.

 

[Wrangler]

How would a theist process it?

Putting aside tribalistic tendencies, I think, generally speaking, different things speak more to different people.

In the big trial at this time, Lindsay Clancy, it is obviously the case. Not only is their polarity, there is a passionate intensity in the public sphere.

While I’m not inclined to disparage any assertion that proves the existence of God, I didn’t find this particular argument the most compelling. If you’re interested, I’ll dig up a vid that shows how math proves the existence of God. Ever hear of THE UNREASONABLE EFFECTIVENESS OF MATHEMATICS IN THE NATURAL SCIENCES By Eugene Wigner?