Proof: You were only forgiven of your past sins!

[Dave L]

I disagree with your view about CREEDS.
I disagree with your accusations toward me and other people.

And I have no interest in reading Creeds you are promoting.....and Zero interest in your diversion to whining about "poor you" being judged.

Perhaps a therapist would be beneficial for your issues.

Glory to God,
Taken

I accuse no body. I only say what the creeds say and what Christendom says.

 

[bbyrd009]

There is no unity apart from creeds.

i see a pretty unified front against your pov here Dave, just sayin'

 

[Dave L]

i see a pretty unified front against your pov here Dave, just sayin'

But, zero success for any proving their claims from scripture.

 

[bbyrd009]

But, zero success for any proving their claims from scripture.

omg Dave, you actually stayed on point? Still forwarding your opinion as fact, but ty
have a nice week ok

Bible Search: trinity
Bible Search: creeds

Still forwarding your opinion as fact says it all, ok

 

[Dave L]

omg Dave, you actually stayed on point? Still forwarding your opinion as fact, but ty
have a nice week ok

Bible Search: trinity

I posted the trinity error thread to give those who disagree a chance to prove their claims. Either the trinity doctrine is true, or those opposing it are wrong.

 

[Taken]

Better "receptive" than "deceptive" ...

A "mis-type" on a particular topic...

But then, on this topic of CREEDS....

Recieve it, Receive it, Receive it....being ones point.

Nay, Nay, Nay....not interested....in reading, considering, vowing.

Oh darn....

If you Won't READ IT......then come to my NEW THREAD, to get your opinion .....
RIGHT AFTER I POST IT, so YOU HAVE TO READ IT.

LOL. Come my little pretties...read, read, read, what you had no interest to read.....

...deception!

LOL-

 

[Dave L]

Better "receptive" than "deceptive" ...

A "mis-type" on a particular topic...

But then, on this topic of CREEDS....

Recieve it, Receive it, Receive it....being ones point.

Nay, Nay, Nay....not interested....in reading, considering, vowing.

Oh darn....

If you Won't READ IT......then come to my NEW THREAD, to get your opinion .....
RIGHT AFTER I POST IT, so YOU HAVE TO READ IT.

LOL. Come my little pretties...read, read, read, what you had no interest to read.....

...deception!

LOL-

Prove the doctrine wrong. It's posted for all to see.

 

[bbyrd009]

I posted the trinity error thread to give those who disagree a chance to prove their claims. Either the trinity doctrine is true, or those opposing it are wrong.

in posturing as though you seek proof you admit you are wrong Dave, there is no proof, and there will not be any proof wadr

we can see the same dynamic going on @ "organic food" v "food," no doubt you are fam with the argument already

you can't prove any trinity any better than anyone can disprove it of course

 

[bbyrd009]

Prove the doctrine wrong. It's posted for all to see.

may as well try to prove that organic food should be called food, and that other stuff should have to use a diff term
Dave. No one has to prove the trinity theory to be wrong, regardless of your feelings on the matter, ok

 

[Dave L]

may as well try to prove that organic food should be called food, and that other stuff should have to use a diff term
Dave

It's posted for all to take a swing at. Until they disprove it, they are wrong.

 

[Dave L]

in posturing as though you seek proof you admit you are wrong Dave, there is no proof, and there will not be any proof wadr

we can see the same dynamic going on @ "organic food" v "food," no doubt you are fam with the argument already

you can't prove any trinity any better than anyone can disprove it of course

So take the challenge...........

 

[bbyrd009]

It's posted for all to take a swing at. Until they disprove it, they are wrong.

no they aren't Dave, except possibly in your mind.

Doctrines are called doctrines bc there is no proof, see, otherwise we would call them Truths

 

[bbyrd009]

So take the challenge...........

there is no challenge, Dave

and "conversing" with you is a foregone conclusion anyway, "challenge" is really disingenuous wadr. To put it nicely

 

[Taken]

I accuse no body.

LOL

I only say what the creeds say and what Christendom says.

ONLY? LOL

Glory to God.

 

[Taken]

Prove the doctrine wrong. It's posted for all to see.

Prove "the doctrine" is Scripturally Required..
In lieu of, or, In addition to, Scripture.

I'll wait. LOL

Glory to God.

 

[Dave L]

LOL



ONLY? LOL

Glory to God.

Why not take a swing at disproving the trinity doctrine. You are wrong until you disprove it.

 

[Dave L]

Prove "the doctrine" is Scripturally Required..
In lieu of, or, In addition to, Scripture.

I'll wait. LOL

Glory to God.

It is all scripture proof if you take time read it.

 

[Taken]

Why not take a swing at disproving the trinity doctrine. You are wrong until you disprove it.

I accuse no body

Your are wrong...

LOL

Glory to God
Taken

 

[Dave L]

LOL

Glory to God
Taken

Let's see some cattle to go with that hat, prove the trinity doctrine wrong.

 

[Taken]

It is all scripture proof if you take time read it.

Thanks for your opinion....however it failed the evidentiary Proof request.

Glory to God,
Taken