First of all - my apologies, these two posts of mine (this one and "Various Questions") I have been reading, but just wanted a little space to think before I came back to answer.(Hawkins;40970)
As the same thing may have different effect on different persons, why not jus try to figure it out by yourself.
I understand this, however it can be a little hard to grasp when that hasn't happened to you. That effect you haven't felt.
Then I figured out that there's another way of thinking, other than the scientific way of thinking, which leads to another set of knowledge. It's more like I have two sets of keys for the opening of two kinds of locked boxes. Logically speaking, what I have now is a superset of what I had in the past, what I had in the past is a subset of what I have now.The other day when I chatted with my brother-in-law who is a hardliner unbeliever, I said to him that I understand exactly the way how he thinks because I used to think the same way as how he thinks. Yet he doesn't understand how I think because he never experiences this way of seeking and searching, I have one more set of tools to use to assist my thinking.
When I was a Christian, science and my religion were quite seperate not really intentionally... that's just how it was, so to some degree. I understand.
I understand. Yet by Covenant we are saved by Faith. If to us, He's unmistakably God, how can we be saved?
You have a good point. But also he is God and he can save people if he chooses to.
I can actually make that example abit more 'scientific' to be illustrative. Almost all scientific truth are somewhat substantial or material in nature. They are about substances located in our 3-dimensional space.For the sake of arguement, spiritual beings substantially reside outside this 3D space but in an upper spatial dimension, which humans were made not to perceive.So now it becomes how effective we are going to explore things within our realm and things outside our 3D realm. Again,Science = easy, Spirituality = difficultWe might need another set of more correct tools to do the exploring, at least we try it another way around.
I do understand what you're saying on this, as there may well be other dimensons which we cannot see... but whether they contain God is a different question. Proving either or both is very difficult scientifically or not.
If so, try it by yourself. That's actually what is recommended.
I'm trying.
Well, I tried to speak in your language, a scientific one. Actually, it's quite interesting to speculate how those Christians speak highly spiritually to keep the other side clueless about what are said. They speak another language that the other side failed to grasp. Hehe...
There has to be some give and take to get to an understand to work from.
As the same thing may have different effect on different persons, why not jus try to figure it out by yourself.
I understand this, however it can be a little hard to grasp when that hasn't happened to you. That effect you haven't felt.
Then I figured out that there's another way of thinking, other than the scientific way of thinking, which leads to another set of knowledge. It's more like I have two sets of keys for the opening of two kinds of locked boxes. Logically speaking, what I have now is a superset of what I had in the past, what I had in the past is a subset of what I have now.The other day when I chatted with my brother-in-law who is a hardliner unbeliever, I said to him that I understand exactly the way how he thinks because I used to think the same way as how he thinks. Yet he doesn't understand how I think because he never experiences this way of seeking and searching, I have one more set of tools to use to assist my thinking.
When I was a Christian, science and my religion were quite seperate not really intentionally... that's just how it was, so to some degree. I understand.
I understand. Yet by Covenant we are saved by Faith. If to us, He's unmistakably God, how can we be saved?
You have a good point. But also he is God and he can save people if he chooses to.
I can actually make that example abit more 'scientific' to be illustrative. Almost all scientific truth are somewhat substantial or material in nature. They are about substances located in our 3-dimensional space.For the sake of arguement, spiritual beings substantially reside outside this 3D space but in an upper spatial dimension, which humans were made not to perceive.So now it becomes how effective we are going to explore things within our realm and things outside our 3D realm. Again,Science = easy, Spirituality = difficultWe might need another set of more correct tools to do the exploring, at least we try it another way around.
I do understand what you're saying on this, as there may well be other dimensons which we cannot see... but whether they contain God is a different question. Proving either or both is very difficult scientifically or not.
If so, try it by yourself. That's actually what is recommended.
I'm trying.
Well, I tried to speak in your language, a scientific one. Actually, it's quite interesting to speculate how those Christians speak highly spiritually to keep the other side clueless about what are said. They speak another language that the other side failed to grasp. Hehe...

There has to be some give and take to get to an understand to work from.
