- Aug 25, 2010
- 340
- 1
- 0
LOL - the eternal debate!
To make your eschatology work, you of Hebrew tongue has to rely on a 17th century, Shakespearean word definition and while you'd like to go against the rules of grammar taught by the experts and rely instead on good old mom - you STILL CANNOT make your interpretation line up with the totality of the conditions within Dan 9:27.
Since you cannot prove your point and show me ANY limited-time, seven-year covenant made by any means, even your warm, fuzzy "confirm" which does not reflect the plain meaning of gabar - you have to ignore the challenge rather than ever admit a fatal flaw in you Preterist view.
To make your eschatology work, you of Hebrew tongue has to rely on a 17th century, Shakespearean word definition and while you'd like to go against the rules of grammar taught by the experts and rely instead on good old mom - you STILL CANNOT make your interpretation line up with the totality of the conditions within Dan 9:27.
Since you cannot prove your point and show me ANY limited-time, seven-year covenant made by any means, even your warm, fuzzy "confirm" which does not reflect the plain meaning of gabar - you have to ignore the challenge rather than ever admit a fatal flaw in you Preterist view.