tabletalk said:
Can you explain your statement: "...Christ was not a Christian"? Wasn't He the first one? At the very least, a Christian must be "in Christ", so Jesus was that for sure!
well, i guess that is an ongoing debate, maybe--most scholars deem Jesus a Jew. But Christ did institute a new dispensation; whether or not that was meant to inculcate a new religion is debatable, even if that was inevitable; it would depend upon how you interpret many passages in Scripture that suggest otherwise, maybe--Paul's "I know that as soon as i leave, the wolves will take over," Christ's comparison of those who follow Him and those who will hear "I never knew you" using the same language and symbology, etc.
So maybe one way to look at that is that there is "Christianity," a sanctioned system of beliefs, wherein we commend each other to each other, that Christ surely would have avoided, and then there is following Christ, a spiritual pursuit that might chiefly be manifested wherever two or three are gathered "in His Name," which we might assume means 2 or 3 people getting together to talk about Jesus, but is more likely wherever 2 or 3 people gather around a need, in service to another.
So, if you consider Christ the first Christian, imo it becomes fair to ask if there have been any others produced by that system of beliefs. Paul and the Apostles certainly were, but they surely had a much different understanding than the one we have in common now. They literally did go out by twos, as Christ commanded the 12 and the 70, etc. What Christian sect teaches this now? I've yet to hear a sermon on it. The Apostles also would have been aghast at our current conception of a Hell in the afterlife, or any vain imaginings of going to Heaven when you die; these have all been constructed by the Christian church, and are not borne out in a holistic view of Scripture. Isaiah describes these as a "Covenant with death," which is a pretty accurate description of many believers (at least initial) concept of salvation; but again, i am confident that you will never hear a sermon on this, or at least i have not. Certainly not by any Established Christian church.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=covenant+with+death
might be something valid in there; but the couple i scanned seem to be pointing fingers at whatever group is considered "other" for the most part. Atheists, or Jews, Israelites, America, JWs, Black America, etc. So the passages that people most need to take to heart for themselves are deemed important, but for someone else iow. No one wants to see themselves as "two men in a bed." And after all why should they, if "getting saved" cured them from all that? Ha. This person is now possessed of seven worse spirits, most likely. At least that is what happened to me.
Vast passages of Scripture are then made moot to them, and cannot be personally applied, an "us" and a "them" is of course immediately installed, and reinforced now by Scripture, supposedly, no mind-changing can occur at all. Anyone who disagrees is judged to be lost. Paul is usually almost exclusively misquoted for this pov, and you might note that quoting Christ is generally frowned upon. Vast eschatologies concerning their "future existence" are constructed, and encouraged. Paul is deemed to have been suicidal or otherwise desirous of death, so that he might be "absent from the body, and present with the Lord."
Contracts for Jesus will be a feature of this belief system, wherein financial accommodations are made for those who (inevitably) espouse the Contract with Death. Not saying that there are not churches that recognize and eschew this, as there certainly are. Many. When you find a pastor who is able to relate how you can apply the lessons of Cain to yourself, you have found a gem. But they are few and far between.