Wormwood
Chaps
Raeneske,
I appreciate your well thought out reply. However, I do not agree that the 10 commandments were seen as "The Moral Law" whereas the rest of the law had no basis in morality. This is simply not true. Aren't homosexuality, gluttony, etc. moral issues? I think we have to be very careful about how we embrace the OT law and see it pertain to our lives today. I believe we died to the law, completely. I do not live under law, but under grace. The Bible is very clear about this. Does this mean we can murder, steal and engage in all kinds of sexual impurity? Certainly not. As Christians, we strive to love God and love others, which is the summary of the law and prophets. So, the question then becomes, "Is observing the Sabbath a critical component to what it means to love God?" Certainly we cannot say we love God if we hate our brothers or murder. We also cannot say we love God and engage in sexual immorality. The Acts 15 passage makes it clear (as well as other passages), that sexual immorality is incompatible with our holy calling. So, back to the question. "Is observing the Sabbath a critical component to what it means to love God?"
I believe the NT clearly teaches that the answer is "No." Allow me to list the following reasons:
1) We see no command in the NT for Gentile believers that observing the Sabbath was a similar expectation as that of abstaining from idolatry and sexual immorality. Why wouldn't the Jewish Christians send out the decree that newly converted Gentiles should keep the Sabbath? I mean, this council in Acts 15 is addressing a HUGE issue in circumcision. They declared that circumcision was unnecessary (EVEN THOUGH IT PREDATED THE LAW!). Circumcision was perhaps the most significant observance of among the Jewish people. If they are going to cast out circumcision, one would think that they would make special note that they are NOT casting out Sabbath observations. Moreover, one would expect that they would expressly command Gentiles to observe the Sabbath since this was not part of the Gentile culture at all. They declared that NO burden should be put on the Gentiles in relation to Jewish customs and observations other than abstaining from the above items. The fact that they don't mention the Sabbath is an overwhelming statement from this council.
2) All kinds of laws such as dietary laws, circumcision, and sacrifices were "types and shadows" to point us to Christ. I believe the Sabbath was also a "type" to point us to Christ. Just as the sacrifices pointed to the sacrifice of Jesus, so also the Sabbath pointed to the rest we find in Christ. Jesus died on Friday and "rested" on the Sabbath...being raised on the first day of the week. The author of Hebrews makes this abundantly clear. Thus, it is evident that the Sabbath was seen as a "type" to point us to Christ and not a moral obligation for Gentile believers. If it were a moral obligation, such as sexual morality or not murdering, it highly doubt it would have been compared to a mere type by which Christians find true rest from their works. Essentially, the author of Hebrews is saying that Christians rest every day because we have died to our "work" and live by grace. Thus, in Christ, every Christian is fulfilling the Sabbath.
3) Numerous passages specifically speak of NOT being judged by the Sabbath. How can you say that the "Sabbaths" Paul spoke of were not part of the moral law? What other "Sabbath" do you think Paul was referring to? Clearly, the Sabbath refers to the observance of the Sabbath. Paul says we are not to be judged by it. I don't think it could be any more clear. To say that Paul was referring to a different kind of Sabbath than the one mentioned in the 10 Commandments is silly. Its pretty clear what Paul meant. Foods, days and Sabbath rests are not gauges by which Christians determine their holiness and we should not allow people to gauge our holiness by such types and shadows.
4) I agree with you that Christians should rest one day per week. Pretty much all of recorded history shows Christians meeting on the first day of the week to focus on the Lord, fellowship and pray. It was clear pretty much from the inception of Christianity that the focus of Christians changed from Sabbath to the first day of the week in celebration of the resurrection of Christ. I think it is extremely important for Christians to meet at least one day a week to rest, worship, encourage one another, teach the Scriptures and pray. In fact, the Scriptures encourage us to not give up meeting together. We should make it a habit to take a day of the week and do this. However, we are not under law and so to start arguing about specific days, or what a person can and cant do to really "rest" is a step in the wrong direction. Again, our focus is no longer being justified by law and worrying about such minutia. We are under grace and are free to love God with all of our hearts as we are led by the Word and Spirit.
In sum, if it impacts your conscience and you cannot in good faith do activities on the Sabbath, then you should not. It is sin for you if you are not acting in faith. However, if I am able to work on a Sabbath and rest and worship on the first day of the week in celebration of the resurrection in good faith, who are you to condemn me? There is no NT verse you can point me to that suggests I am in error and I have multiple verses in the NT that teach that I am observing the Sabbath due to my rest from my works of the law in the grace of Christ. Thus, I do not feel any obligation to be bound by your conscience on issues not expressly stated in the New Testament.
I appreciate your well thought out reply. However, I do not agree that the 10 commandments were seen as "The Moral Law" whereas the rest of the law had no basis in morality. This is simply not true. Aren't homosexuality, gluttony, etc. moral issues? I think we have to be very careful about how we embrace the OT law and see it pertain to our lives today. I believe we died to the law, completely. I do not live under law, but under grace. The Bible is very clear about this. Does this mean we can murder, steal and engage in all kinds of sexual impurity? Certainly not. As Christians, we strive to love God and love others, which is the summary of the law and prophets. So, the question then becomes, "Is observing the Sabbath a critical component to what it means to love God?" Certainly we cannot say we love God if we hate our brothers or murder. We also cannot say we love God and engage in sexual immorality. The Acts 15 passage makes it clear (as well as other passages), that sexual immorality is incompatible with our holy calling. So, back to the question. "Is observing the Sabbath a critical component to what it means to love God?"
I believe the NT clearly teaches that the answer is "No." Allow me to list the following reasons:
1) We see no command in the NT for Gentile believers that observing the Sabbath was a similar expectation as that of abstaining from idolatry and sexual immorality. Why wouldn't the Jewish Christians send out the decree that newly converted Gentiles should keep the Sabbath? I mean, this council in Acts 15 is addressing a HUGE issue in circumcision. They declared that circumcision was unnecessary (EVEN THOUGH IT PREDATED THE LAW!). Circumcision was perhaps the most significant observance of among the Jewish people. If they are going to cast out circumcision, one would think that they would make special note that they are NOT casting out Sabbath observations. Moreover, one would expect that they would expressly command Gentiles to observe the Sabbath since this was not part of the Gentile culture at all. They declared that NO burden should be put on the Gentiles in relation to Jewish customs and observations other than abstaining from the above items. The fact that they don't mention the Sabbath is an overwhelming statement from this council.
2) All kinds of laws such as dietary laws, circumcision, and sacrifices were "types and shadows" to point us to Christ. I believe the Sabbath was also a "type" to point us to Christ. Just as the sacrifices pointed to the sacrifice of Jesus, so also the Sabbath pointed to the rest we find in Christ. Jesus died on Friday and "rested" on the Sabbath...being raised on the first day of the week. The author of Hebrews makes this abundantly clear. Thus, it is evident that the Sabbath was seen as a "type" to point us to Christ and not a moral obligation for Gentile believers. If it were a moral obligation, such as sexual morality or not murdering, it highly doubt it would have been compared to a mere type by which Christians find true rest from their works. Essentially, the author of Hebrews is saying that Christians rest every day because we have died to our "work" and live by grace. Thus, in Christ, every Christian is fulfilling the Sabbath.
3) Numerous passages specifically speak of NOT being judged by the Sabbath. How can you say that the "Sabbaths" Paul spoke of were not part of the moral law? What other "Sabbath" do you think Paul was referring to? Clearly, the Sabbath refers to the observance of the Sabbath. Paul says we are not to be judged by it. I don't think it could be any more clear. To say that Paul was referring to a different kind of Sabbath than the one mentioned in the 10 Commandments is silly. Its pretty clear what Paul meant. Foods, days and Sabbath rests are not gauges by which Christians determine their holiness and we should not allow people to gauge our holiness by such types and shadows.
4) I agree with you that Christians should rest one day per week. Pretty much all of recorded history shows Christians meeting on the first day of the week to focus on the Lord, fellowship and pray. It was clear pretty much from the inception of Christianity that the focus of Christians changed from Sabbath to the first day of the week in celebration of the resurrection of Christ. I think it is extremely important for Christians to meet at least one day a week to rest, worship, encourage one another, teach the Scriptures and pray. In fact, the Scriptures encourage us to not give up meeting together. We should make it a habit to take a day of the week and do this. However, we are not under law and so to start arguing about specific days, or what a person can and cant do to really "rest" is a step in the wrong direction. Again, our focus is no longer being justified by law and worrying about such minutia. We are under grace and are free to love God with all of our hearts as we are led by the Word and Spirit.
In sum, if it impacts your conscience and you cannot in good faith do activities on the Sabbath, then you should not. It is sin for you if you are not acting in faith. However, if I am able to work on a Sabbath and rest and worship on the first day of the week in celebration of the resurrection in good faith, who are you to condemn me? There is no NT verse you can point me to that suggests I am in error and I have multiple verses in the NT that teach that I am observing the Sabbath due to my rest from my works of the law in the grace of Christ. Thus, I do not feel any obligation to be bound by your conscience on issues not expressly stated in the New Testament.